HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 556/2/447    most recent jphysiol.2003.059204v1 Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dargan, S. L. Articles by Parker, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dargan, S. L. Articles by Parker, I.

¹ Department of Neurobiology and Behaviour, University of California Irvine, CA 92697-4550, USA² Division of Histology, Department of Medicine, University of Fribourg, Switzerland

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Ca²⁺-binding proteins (CaBPs) are expressed in a highly specific manner across many different cell types, yet the physiological basis underlying their selective distribution patterns remains unclear. We used confocal line-scan microscopy together with photo-release of IP₃ in Xenopus oocytes to investigate the actions of mobile cytosolic CaBPs on the spatiotemporal properties of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals. Parvalbumin (PV), a CaBP with slow Ca²⁺-binding kinetics, shortened the duration of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals and ‘balkanized’ global responses into discrete localized events (puffs). In contrast, calretinin (CR), a presumed fast buffer, prolonged Ca²⁺ responses and promoted ‘globalization’ of spatially uniform Ca²⁺ signals at high [IP₃]. Oocytes loaded with CR or PV showed Ca²⁺ puffs following photolysis flashes that were subthreshold in controls, and the spatiotemporal properties of these localized events were differentially modulated by PV and CR. In comparison to results we previously obtained with exogenous Ca²⁺ buffers, PV closely mimicked the actions of the slow buffer EGTA, whereas CR showed important differences from the fast buffer BAPTA. Most notably, puffs were never observed after loading BAPTA, and this exogenous buffer did not show the marked sensitization of IP₃ action evident with CR. The ability of Ca²⁺ buffers and CaBPs with differing kinetics to fine-tune both global and local intracellular Ca²⁺ signals is likely to have significant physiological implications.

(Received 3 December 2003; accepted after revision 29 January 2004; first published online 30 January 2004)
Corresponding author I. Parker: Department of Neurobiology and Behaviour, University of California Irvine, CA 92697-4550, USA. Email: iparker{at}uci.edu

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Cytosolic Ca²⁺ signals regulate cellular processes as diverse as fertilization, differentiation, synaptic plasticity and apoptosis. This versatility is possible because cells are equipped with a Ca²⁺ signalling ‘toolkit’ (Berridge et al. 2000), with many components (proteins) that can be selected to enable signalling over a wide range of different time and distance scales (Marchant & Parker, 2000). The most important components in the toolkit are the Ca²⁺ channels that generate intracellular Ca²⁺ signals; either by allowing Ca²⁺ influx across the plasma membrane, or by liberating Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores (through inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP₃Rs) or ryanodine receptors (RyRs)). The majority of Ca²⁺ ions entering the cytosol are rapidly captured both by mobile cytosolic Ca²⁺-binding proteins (CaBPs) and immobile buffers of unknown identity. In addition to simply reducing the availability of free cytosolic Ca²⁺ ions, immobile buffers reduce the effective diffusion coefficient for Ca²⁺, whereas mobile buffers can act as a ‘shuttle’ to speed Ca²⁺ diffusion in the presence of immobile buffers (Stern, 1992; Roberts, 1994). It is thus likely that cells utilize CaBPs to shape Ca²⁺ signals for their specific functions; a notion supported by observations that different cell types – particularly subpopulations of neurones – selectively express mobile CaBPs with differing properties (Andressen et al. 1993).

CaBPs vary significantly in functional versatility, and are classified accordingly. ‘Ca²⁺ sensors’, such as calmodulin (Cheung, 1980; Vetter & Leclerc, 2003), undergo conformational changes on Ca²⁺ binding which enable them to bind to and activate target proteins to translate changes in intracellular [Ca²⁺] into signalling cascades. On the other hand, ‘Ca²⁺ buffers’ such as parvalbumin (PV) and calretinin (CR) are thought to act solely to chelate Ca²⁺ ions – although this view may change as we learn more about their biology (Schwaller et al. 2002). Despite their apparent passive function, PV and CR have nevertheless generated great interest, mainly due to their exquisitely specific expression in certain subpopulations of nerve cells (Baimbridge et al. 1992; Andressen et al. 1993). In the cerebellum, for example, PV is present in Purkinje cells and a subpopulation of inhibitory interneurones (stellate and basket cells), whereas CR is mainly localized to granule cells and their parallel fibres (Schwaller et al. 2002). These selective distribution patterns provide an invaluable experimental tool for identifying subpopulations of neurones (antibodies against them are routinely used to stain for specific populations of nerve cells). However, the physiological basis underlying their specific expression patterns has remained largely elusive (Neher, 2000), although recent studies with knockout mice now point to specific roles for CaBPs in regulating Ca²⁺ pools essential for synaptic plasticity (Schwaller et al. 2002).

Most experimental and theoretical investigations regarding CaBPs have focused on their ability to modulate signals arising from Ca²⁺ influx through voltage-gated channels in the plasma membrane (Lee et al. 2000a,b; Meinrenken et al. 2003; Schmidt et al. 2003b). Actions of CaBPs on signals arising from Ca²⁺ release from intracellular stores (via IP₃Rs or RyRs) are likely to reflect a more complex situation (Dargan & Parker, 2003) because these release channels are themselves regulated by cytosolic [Ca²⁺], such that small increases in cytosolic [Ca²⁺] promote channel opening whereas higher concentrations are inhibitory (Iino, 1990; Finch et al. 1991; Bezprozvanny et al. 1991; Mak et al. 1998; Fill & Copello, 2002). Moreover, IP₃Rs are known to exist in clusters, comprising tens of channels, which act as functionally discrete Ca²⁺ release units (Callamaras et al. 1998a, b; Sun et al. 1998; Swillens et al. 1999). Clusters can operate autonomously to generate local signals (Ca²⁺ puffs) that arise because Ca²⁺-induced Ca²⁺ release (CICR) leads to the near-simultaneous opening of multiple channels within a cluster (Yao et al. 1995; Bootman et al. 1997), and their activity can be synchronized by successive cycles of Ca²⁺ diffusion and CICR to generate Ca²⁺ waves that propagate in a saltatory manner across multiple clusters (Lechleiter & Clapham, 1992; Bootman et al. 1997; Berridge, 1997; Callamaras et al. 1998a,b; Dawson et al. 1999). Therefore, in addition to influencing the fate of Ca²⁺ ions already released into the cytosol, CaBPs are also likely to interfere with the Ca²⁺ feedback loops that act on very different distance and time scales to generate local signals by interactions between individual IP₃Rs, and on the cluster–cluster interactions responsible for transitioning from local to global modes of Ca²⁺ signalling.

We had previously studied these processes utilizing Xenopus oocytes as a model cell system in which to image perturbations of Ca²⁺ signalling resulting from intracellular injections of two synthetic buffers, EGTA and BAPTA (Dargan & Parker, 2003). The oocyte is a favourable system in which to study intracellular Ca²⁺ signals because Ca²⁺ liberation is mediated solely through type 1 IP₃Rs (Parys et al. 1992), its large size greatly facilitates intracellular injections and it is among the best characterized cells for Ca²⁺ signalling. Moreover, EGTA and BAPTA were selected because the Ca²⁺-binding properties of these buffers are simple and well characterized and, while having similar affinities, they show very different binding kinetics. Our main findings were that the ‘slow’ buffer EGTA accelerates the time course of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals and dissociates global Ca²⁺ waves into autonomous local release events, whereas the ‘fast’ buffer BAPTA results in ‘globalization’ of spatially diffuse, and slowly decaying Ca²⁺ signals. These actions were attributed to the differential effects of buffers with differing kinetics on Ca²⁺ interactions between individual IP₃Rs within a cluster, and on interactions between neighbouring clusters.

In the present paper we extend these studies to the more complex CaBPs expressed endogenously within cells. PV and CR were selected for these experiments because they show cell-specific expression and have contrasting Ca²⁺-binding kinetics. Under physiological conditions PV acts as a slow buffer, because its binding sites are predominantly occupied by Mg²⁺ ions which must be displaced before Ca²⁺ can bind (Haiech et al. 1979; Eberhard & Erne, 1994). CR is less well characterized, but functions as a fast intracellular buffer (Edmonds et al. 2000) analogous to BAPTA. We show that the ‘slow’ CaBP (PV) closely mimics the actions of EGTA, by speeding IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ transients and ‘balkanizing’ global Ca²⁺ waves into local puffs. On the other hand, the ‘fast’ CaBP (CR) has more complex actions. High concentrations of CR result in spatially diffuse, slowly decaying Ca²⁺ signals similar to the action of BAPTA; but, different to BAPTA, CR sensitizes responses to IP₃ and low concentrations of CR actually promote local puffs. The ability of CaBPs to specifically modulate both local and global intracellular Ca²⁺ signals is likely to have significant physiological implications.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Preparation of Xenopus oocytes

Xenopus laevis (purchased from Nasco International, Fort Atkinson, WI, USA) were anaesthetized by immersion in 0.17% MS-222 for 15 min and killed by decapitation in adherence with protocols approved by the UC Irvine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Stage V–VI oocytes were manually plucked, collagenase-treated (0.5 mg ml^–1 for 30 min) and stored in modified Barth's solution (mM: NaCl, 88; KCl, 1; NaHCO₃, 2.4; MgSO₄, 0.82; Ca(NO₃)₂, 0.33; CaCl₂, 0.41; Hepes, 5; gentamicin, 0.1 mg ml^–1; pH 7.4) for 1–7 days before use.

Preparation of Ca²⁺-binding proteins and injection solutions

Human recombinant CR containing a 6xHis tag on the N-terminus was produced in E. coli as previously described (Schwaller et al. 1997), and the overexpressed protein was purified on a nickel chelate column. The 6xHis tag does not appear to influence the Ca²⁺-binding affinities of CR (B. Schwaller, unpublished observation). After dialysis, CR was lyophilized from 50 µl of a solution containing (mM): (NH₄)HCO₃, 5; CaCl₂, 1; (ß-mercaptoethanol, 1 and DTT, 1. Neither (NH₄)HCO₃ nor (ß-mercaptoethanol were expected to be present in the injection solution since they are both volatile and would have evaporated during lyophilization. However, CR in the injection solution was expected to be in its Ca²⁺-bound form. Experiments to control for the presence of Ca²⁺ and DTT in the CR injection solution are presented in Results. Recombinant rat PV was produced in E. coli, purified by chromatographic methods as previously described (Pauls et al. 1993) and lyophilized after desalting on a spin column. Thus the PV-containing injection solution did not contain any salts beyond those listed below. Lyophilized CaBPs were dissolved in 250 mM KCl, 10 mM Hepes to give 1 mM stock injection solutions, which were aliquotted into small volumes each sufficient for one experiment, and stored at –20°C until use.

Microinjection of oocytes

Intracellular microinjections were performed using a Drummond microinjector, and final intracellular concentrations were calculated assuming a 1 µl cytosolic volume. Oocytes were initially loaded with OG-1 (Oregon Green 488 BAPTA-1) and caged-IP₃ (D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, P₄₍₅₎-(1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyl) ester) to final intracellular concentrations of 48 and 8 µM, respectively. Control Ca²⁺ responses were imaged, after allowing 30 min for intracellular distribution. A specified volume of CaBP-containing solution was then injected through a fresh micropipette that was removed immediately to minimize leakage, and Ca²⁺ responses were imaged after allowing > 15 min for intracellular equilibration of [CaBP]. Sequential injections and recordings were made in this way to examine the effects of stepwise increases in [CaBP]. For the experiments studying local events (Fig. 6) oocytes were loaded with Fluo-4-dextran (low affinity version: 25 µM final intracellular concentration), caged-IP₃ (12 µM), and either PV (100 µM) or CR (100 µM); and were imaged 1.5 h later, to allow for slow diffusion of dextran-conjugated Fluo-4.

View larger version (58K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6.  IP3-evoked Ca2+ puffs terminated more rapidly in the presence of parvalbumin Averaged line-scan images (n= 18 events for each) and their corresponding fluorescence profiles (averaged over 0.6 µm regions) of Ca2+ puffs evoked by low photo-release of IP3 in the absence of added buffer (left panel) and in the presence of 50 µM PV (centre panel) or 50 µM CR (right panel). Images were acquired at a scan rate of 2.6 ms line–1 using the indicator dye Fluo-4-dextran (low affinity version). Red curves represent single (for PV oocyte) or double (for control and CR-containing oocyte) exponential fits to the decay phase of puffs.

Confocal Ca²⁺ images were obtained as previously described (Dargan & Parker, 2003), using a custom-built line-scan confocal scanner interfaced to an Olympus IX70 inverted microscope (Parker et al. 1997). Images were collected using custom-written image acquisition software (Labview). Recordings were made at room temperature, imaging at the level of the pigment granules in the animal hemisphere of oocytes bathed in normal Ringer solution (composition (mM): NaCl₂, 120; KCl, 2; CaCl₂, 1.8; Hepes, 5; pH 7.3). Images in figures are representative confocal recordings acquired at a scan rate of 16 ms line^–1 (except Fig. 6, acquired at 2.6 ms line^–1). IP₃ was uniformly photo-released throughout a 200 µm spot surrounding the image scan line (Callamaras & Parker, 1998), and [IP₃] was controlled (in a linear manner) by using an electronic shutter to vary flash duration. Since each flash consumes only a negligible fraction of the caged IP₃ (Callamaras & Parker, 1998), numerous consistent responses could be acquired using repeated flashes. Intervals of > 60 s were allowed between recordings for IP₃Rs to recover from desensitization and for cytosolic [Ca²⁺] to recover to basal levels. Fluorescence signals are expressed as ratios (F/F₀ or F/F₀) of the fluorescence (F) at each pixel relative to the mean resting fluorescence (F_o) at that pixel prior to stimulation. Flash durations are normalized relative to that evoking a half-maximal response under control conditions in each cell, to control for variation between oocytes. Custom routines written in the IDL programming environment (Research Systems, Boulder, CO, USA) were used for image processing and measurements were exported to Microcal Origin version 6.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) for analysis and graphing.

Derivation of calcium flux

To estimate the kinetics of Ca²⁺ flux from into the cytosol through IP₃Rs (Fig. 4) we assumed that that subsequent Ca²⁺ clearance follows a first order process (Parker et al. 1996) with a rate constant (k; 0.95 s^–1) corresponding to that previously measured from the decay of Ca²⁺ signals following influx through N-type channels (Dargan & Parker, 2003). The rate of Ca²⁺ efflux (E) from intracellular stores is thus proportional to

(1)

where [Ca²⁺] is the free Ca²⁺ level as signalled by the fluorescence. Traces of Ca²⁺ flux through IP₃Rs (Fig. 4B) were calculated from this equation by numerical differentiation of the ‘raw’ fluorescence traces (Fig. 4A) after smoothing by a 15 point running average to reduce noise.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4.  Biphasic Ca2+ liberation through IP3Rs, and selective reduction of the slow component of Ca2+ release by parvalbumin A, representative fluorescence signals evoked by photoreleased IP3 in control conditions (top), and in the presence of 100 µM PV (middle) or 100 µM CR (bottom). B, rates of Ca2+ flux into the cytosol derived from the records in A, assuming that cytosolic Ca2+ clearance follows a first order process with a time constant of about 1 s (see text for further details). Traces were smoothed using 15 point adjacent averaging. The vertical calibration bars correspond to a rate of increase in fluorescence (d(F/Fo)/dt). Control traces (in A and B) are from the same oocyte as the CR traces. The fluorescence trace for the PV-paired control (not shown) was closely similar to that of the CR-paired control.

Oregon Green 488 BAPTA-1, caged IP₃ and Fluo-4-dextran (low affinity version, K_d= 4 µM) were purchased from Molecular Probes Inc. (Eugene, OR, USA); all other reagents were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA).

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Modulation of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals by mobile CaBPs

We compared the actions of two mobile CaBPs with differing Ca²⁺ binding kinetics, PV and CR, on IP₃-evoked intracellular Ca²⁺ signals in Xenopus oocytes. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate our basic experimental protocol. Ca²⁺ images were acquired at various concentrations of CaBPs in response to a fixed flash duration (Fig. 1) or series of flash durations (Fig. 2). Following acquisition of control records (top panels: Figs 1 and 2), a specified volume of a CaBP-containing solution (PV; Figs 1A and 2A: CR; Figs 1B and 2B) was injected into the oocyte to give a final intracellular concentration of 25 µM (see Methods for details). Microinjection pipettes were removed immediately following injection, to prevent leakage, and the oocytes were left for 20 min to allow for uniform CaBP distribution. Ca²⁺ signals were then imaged in response to the same series of UV flashes. Subsequent injections were made following the same protocol to image IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals at various cytosolic CaBP concentrations ranging from 50 to 250 µM.

View larger version (95K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1.  Parvalbumin (PV) and calretinin (CR) modulate IP3-evoked Ca2+ signals Confocal line-scan images from two oocytes illustrate Ca2+ signals evoked by photoreleased IP3 in the presence of increasing [PV] or [CR]. Data are representative of similar findings in 37 oocytes (PV, n= 18; CR, n= 19). Identical photolysis flashes (normalized durations of 1.4 in A and 1.7 in B) were delivered at the arrows. Traces below each image show fluorescence profiles averaged over 21 pixels (1.4 µm) regions. A, top panel shows control response prior to loading buffer, and subsequent panels illustrate responses after sequentially loading the same oocyte with PV to the final intracellular concentrations stated. B, similar records from a different oocyte showing the effects of increasing concentrations of CR.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2.  Parvalbumin and calretinin differentially modulate the decay kinetics of IP3-evoked Ca2+ transients A, buffer actions at varying [IP3]. Representative fluorescence profiles show superimposed Ca2+ transients evoked by increasing photorelease of IP3 in the absence of exogenous CaBP (top panels) and after loading increasing concentrations of PV (left) or CR (right). Traces correspond to different photolysis flash durations, indicated in normalized units. B, Ca2+ transients are shortened by PV but prolonged by CR. Families of curves illustrating Ca2+ transients evoked by a fixed photolysis flash in the presence of the indicated concentrations of PV (left) and CR (right) (normalized flash durations were 1.4 and 1.7, for PV and CR, respectively). Responses are scaled to same peak height to facilitate comparison of kinetics.

Differential actions of ‘slow’ and ‘fast’ CaBPs on the decay of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals

In control conditions (before loading any CaBPs), IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ transients decayed mono-exponentially with a time constant of a few seconds that slowed progressively with increasing photo-release of IP₃ (Fig. 2A, top panels). In the presence of increasing [PV] the decay of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals became markedly biphasic, with a prominent fast component and a smaller slower component. CR also induced bi-exponential decay, but in this case the slow-phase was more pronounced and the fast component became smaller with increasing [CR]. These actions are more clearly evident in Fig. 2B, showing superimposed responses to strong photolysis flashes in the presence of increasing [PV] or [CR] after normalizing amplitudes to facilitate comparison of their respective kinetics.

Facilitation and depression of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals by ‘slow’ CaBPs

Figure 3A and B shows the mean peak amplitude of fluorescence signals at various concentrations of PV and CR, respectively, plotted as a function of increasing photorelease of IP₃ (expressed as normalized flash duration; see Methods). These data are fitted by the Hill equation: y=V_max (x^nH/(EC₅₀^nH+x^nH)), where y is the peak fluorescence ratio (F/F_o) at any given [IP₃] (x); V_max is the peak F/F_o at saturating [IP₃]; n_H is the Hill coefficient, a measure of the apparent cooperativity of IP₃ action in evoking Ca²⁺ liberation; and the EC₅₀ is the normalized [IP₃] evoking a half-maximal response. Parameters generated from these Hill fits are plotted in Fig. 3C–E to show the dependence of V_max (Fig. 3C), n_H (Fig. 3D) and EC₅₀ (Fig. 3E) on [PV] () and [CR] ().

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3.  CaBPs modulate the concentration–response relationship of IP3-evoked Ca2+ signals A and B, mean peak amplitude (F/Fo) of Ca2+ signals as a function of normalized photolysis flash duration, plotted for various intracellular concentrations of PV (A: n= 16 oocytes) and CR (B: n= 18 oocytes). Curves were fitted using the Hill equation. C–E, parameters derived from Hill fits to the concentration–response relationships. In each panel, represent values derived at different concentrations of PV, and show corresponding values for CR. Horizontal lines represent control values (i.e. before loading CaBP). C, Vmax (maximal fluorescence signal at infinite [IP3]) as a function of [CaBP]. D, Hill coefficients (nH) as functions of [CaBP]. E, EC50 as a function of [CaBP].

Although CR reduced V_max (Fig. 3C), responses to weak flashes were potentiated (Fig. 3B). This arose as the result of a marked leftward shift in the concentration–response relationship, such that the EC₅₀ (normalized flash duration evoking a half-maximal signal) was reduced by about 55% with 100 µM CR (Fig. 3E). In contrast, the potentiation seen with PV involved only an increase in V_max, while the EC₅₀ remained almost unchanged (Fig. 3E).

In contrast to the PV-containing injection solution (which comprised only PV, together with 250 mM KCl and 10 mM Hepes), the CR-containing injection solution additionally contained DTT and Ca²⁺ (see Methods). To assess whether these may have influenced the results obtained with CR we performed control experiments comparing IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals before and after loading DTT to an equivalent final intracellular concentration (75 µM). No appreciable differences were observed (V_max decreased by 5.2 ± 6.7%; EC₅₀ increased by 11.3 ± 4.5%: n= 8 oocytes, 2 frogs). Moreover, little change was apparent when oocytes were loaded with Ca²⁺ (50 nl of 1.5 mM CaCl₂) together with DTT (V_max increased by 5.9 ± 4.1%; EC₅₀ increased by 4 ± 7%: n= 6 oocytes, 2 frogs).

CaBPs reduce the apparent cooperativity of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ liberation

Control oocytes (without added buffer) displayed a strongly cooperative Hill coefficient (n_H9). This value is greater than expected even if the opening of the IP₃R channel requires IP₃ binding to all four subunits, and is likely to reflect both the requirement for IP₃-binding to more than one subunit, together with a positive cooperativity resulting from CICR (Meyer et al. 1990; Hirota et al. 1995; Marchant & Taylor, 1997; Callamaras et al. 1998a). Consistent with this, the Hill coefficient declined progressively with increasing concentrations of PV and CR; probably because CaBPs disrupt Ca²⁺ diffusion between IP₃Rs that ordinarily leads to CICR and contributes appreciably to the apparent cooperativity of IP₃ action (Dargan & Parker, 2003). The minimal n_H (2) obtained in the presence of high concentrations of PV and CR suggests that the binding of two (or possibly even one) molecules of IP₃ to each tetramer is sufficient for channel opening. Moreover, a low concentration (25 µM) of PV caused a greater reduction in n_H than the same concentration of CR (Fig. 3D).

Biphasic Ca²⁺ liberation through IP₃Rs

To further elucidate the actions of CaBPs on the kinetics of Ca²⁺ signals, we attempted to derive the changes in underlying Ca²⁺ flux through IP₃Rs. The time course of cytosolic [Ca²⁺] reflects a balance between Ca²⁺ liberation through the IP₃R and the subsequent clearance of free Ca²⁺ ions from the cytosol by chelation, re-sequestration and extrusion. We estimated the release flux based on previous findings that cytosolic Ca²⁺ clearance in the oocyte can be approximated as a first order process with a rate constant (k) of about 0.95 s^–1 (Parker et al. 1996: Dargan & Parker, 2003). The kinetics of Ca²⁺ flux into the cytosol through IP₃Rs will thus be proportional to d[Ca²⁺]/dt+k[Ca²⁺], where [Ca²⁺] is the free cytosolic Ca²⁺ level as signalled by changes in fluorescence (F/F).

Figure 4 shows representative traces of ‘raw’ fluorescence signals (A) and derived Ca²⁺ flux rates (B) under control conditions and after intracellular loading of 100 µM PV or CR. Consistent with previous observations (Parker et al. 1996; Dargan & Parker, 2003), IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ flux in control oocytes was characterized by an initial fast spike followed by a lingering ‘tail’ that persisted for several seconds (Fig. 4B, top panel). Despite its low amplitude, this tail component contributes significantly to the total amount of liberated Ca²⁺, and is responsible for the prolonged Ca²⁺ transients evoked by IP₃ under normal conditions (Parker et al. 1996; Dargan & Parker, 2003). PV abolished the tail component (Fig. 4B, middle panel), whereas the same concentration of CR did not Fig. 4B, bottom panel). These findings mirror our earlier results with EGTA and BAPTA (Dargan & Parker, 2003) in showing that prolonged release of Ca²⁺ through the IP₃R is selectively disrupted by slow buffers.

‘Fast’ and ‘slow’ CaBPs differentially alter the spatial distribution of Ca²⁺ signals

Control oocytes without added CaBPs often display localized Ca²⁺ signals (puffs) within a narrow range of flash durations (Yao et al. 1995); but, as was the case in Fig. 5, it is sometimes possible to evoke only spatially diffuse Ca²⁺ waves (Fig. 5A). Following injection of 100 µM PV, the same oocytes displayed discrete localized puffs with flash durations that were too brief to evoke detectable responses under control conditions (top panels, Fig. 5A and B: representative of 9 oocytes). Moreover, following strong flashes, PV ‘balkanized’ global signals into localized release events (middle panel, Fig. 5B), which arose synchronously at higher [IP₃] generating the abrupt, rapidly decaying Ca²⁺ transients previously described (bottom panels, Figs 5B and 1A). Puffs observed following this initial transient were asynchronous, and increased in frequency with progressively stronger stimuli.

View larger version (81K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5.  Parvalbumin ‘balkanizes’ Ca2+ signals into discrete, autonomous units, whereas calretinin promotes spatially uniform global signals A, line-scan images and fluorescence profiles (averaged over 4 µm regions) showing responses to photolysis flashes (red arrows) of increasing duration (indicated in normalized units) before injecting buffer. B, corresponding records in a different oocyte after loading 100 µM PV (records in this oocyte before loading PV were similar to those in A). Two representative fluorescence profiles are illustrated from each image, recorded at different puff sites (black arrows). C, corresponding records after loading with 100 µM CR, from the same oocyte as in A.

CaBPs modulate the spatiotemporal properties of Ca²⁺ puffs

Ca²⁺ puffs arise from autonomous activation of individual clusters of IP₃Rs. The fact that both PV and CR promoted the appearance of Ca²⁺ puffs thus allowed us to investigate their respective effects on the interactions between IP₃Rs within a cluster while excluding the cluster–cluster interactions that lead to global waves. For these experiments we selected oocytes that showed puffs in the absence of added CaBP, and imaged using the Ca²⁺ indicator dye Fluo-4-dextran which shows a greater (15-fold) Ca²⁺-dependent fluorescence increase as compared to Oregon Green, whilst obviating the rapid compartmentalization experienced with free Fluo-4. Figure 6 shows averaged confocal line-scan images of Ca²⁺ puffs (n= 18 events for each image) evoked in control, PV- and CR-containing oocytes, together with corresponding traces of fluorescence amplitude measured at the centre of each event. The time course of puff termination was determined by fitting single or double exponential curves (red) to the decay of averaged fluorescence profiles. In control oocytes the mean decay followed a bi-exponential curve, with an initial rapid decline (= 65 ms) followed by a slow tail (= 809 ms). PV (50 µM) almost completely abolished this tail component, while having little effect on the initial fast decay (= 67 ms). CR (50 µM) slightly accelerated the fast decay (= 48 ms), while slightly slowing the tail (= 967 ms) component, as compared to control. In all conditions, the decay of Ca²⁺ signals during puffs was faster than the corresponding decay of global Ca²⁺ signals; this was probably due, at least in part, to the rapid diffusional dissipation of Ca²⁺ ions from the localized release source at a puff site. CaBPs therefore not only differentially modulate global responses (Fig. 1) but can additionally shape local IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
IP₃Rs are distributed in clusters (comprising tens of channels) spaced a few micrometres apart in the cytoplasm of cells ranging from Xenopus oocytes (Callamaras et al. 1998a,b; Swillens et al. 1999; Shuai & Jung, 2002, 2003) to various mammalian cell lines (Bootman et al. 1997; Simpson et al. 1997). CICR between IP₃Rs can thus act over two very different spatiotemporal scales: fast diffusion of Ca²⁺ over short (nm) distances within a release site to generate local Ca²⁺ puffs, and slower diffusion between neighbouring clusters (µm scale) to generate propagating saltatory waves (Yao et al. 1995; Bootman et al. 1997; Berridge, 1997; Callamaras et al. 1998a,b; Marchant & Parker, 2000). Intracellular Ca²⁺ buffers with differing kinetics are likely to exert complex actions on IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signalling, by differentially modulating one, or both, of these CICR processes. To study these actions we measured the effects of injecting exogenous buffers into Xenopus oocytes. A complication of this approach is that little is known regarding the nature and properties of the endogenous buffers already present in the oocyte. However, the finding that the addition of small amounts of exogenous buffer (e.g. an intracellular concentration of 25 µM parvalbumin) produced large effects on Ca²⁺ signals suggests that only low levels of endogenous mobile buffer are present, and would not appreciably affect our results at higher concentrations of added buffers. We had previously investigated two exogenous buffers, EGTA and BAPTA, since they have simple and well-characterized binding properties and have similar affinities yet very different kinetics (Dargan & Parker, 2003). The results and working model that emerged from that study now provide a framework for our analysis of the two endogenous CaBPs PV and CR which, in contrast to EGTA and BAPTA, contain multiple Ca²⁺-binding sites and exhibit more complex Ca²⁺-binding properties in terms of both kinetics and binding affinities.

Spatiotemporal patterning of Ca²⁺ signals is differentially modulated by fast and slow exogenous buffers

The main findings from our previous study (Dargan & Parker, 2003) were that EGTA (a ‘slow’ Ca²⁺ buffer) caused IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals to become more transient, and ‘balkanized’ Ca²⁺ liberation such that individual release sites functioned autonomously to generate discrete puffs, whereas BAPTA (a ‘fast’ Ca²⁺ buffer) prolonged IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ responses and promoted ‘globalization’ of spatially uniform Ca²⁺ signals. These strikingly distinct actions were not due to chelation of Ca²⁺ subsequent to its liberation into the cytosol, changes in resting free [Ca²⁺] or alterations in Ca²⁺ store filling. Instead, EGTA and BAPTA are likely to act over different time and distance scales to modulate the processes of Ca²⁺ diffusion and CICR that shape the regenerative nature of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ liberation. We previously proposed that slow Ca²⁺ buffers bind Ca²⁺ ions diffusing over the micrometer distances between neighbouring clustered release sites, render this Ca²⁺ unavailable for further CICR, and ‘shuttle’ it long distances before ‘dumping’ Ca²⁺ ions deep in the interior of the oocyte where release sites are absent (Dargan & Parker, 2003). The overall action of slow buffers is thus to disrupt intercluster Ca²⁺ communication, sharply restricting Ca²⁺ signals around individual release sites, whilst sparing short-range Ca²⁺ feedback. We additionally proposed that fast buffers may bind Ca²⁺ ions diffusing over nanometer distances to disrupt CICR between individual receptors within clusters. Ca²⁺ bound to fast buffers is rapidly (10 ms) ‘shuttled’ a few micrometres, a distance comparable to intercluster spacing, before it dissociates. In this manner, fast buffers may act to inhibit intracluster feedback by Ca²⁺ whilst simultaneously facilitating intercluster Ca²⁺ communication.

Ca²⁺-binding properties of PV and CR versus EGTA and BAPTA

Table 1 lists key factors determining the interactions of Ca²⁺ ions with PV and CR and, for comparison, with EGTA and BAPTA. Parameters include: (1) the mean time for which a Ca²⁺ ion will diffuse (_capture) and the distance (d_capture) that it will diffuse before it becomes bound to a buffer molecule; (2) the mean time (dwell time; _dwell) for which a Ca²⁺ ion will remain bound to a buffer before dissociating, and the corresponding mean distance (‘shuttle’ distance; d_shuttle) that the Ca²⁺–buffer complex will diffuse before dissociation. Further, diffusion of Ca²⁺ ions in the cytosol is slowed by binding to endogenous, immobile buffers. Less than 10% of the total Ca²⁺ ions in the cytosol are free at any given time, and the apparent diffusion coefficient for Ca²⁺ in the oocyte is thereby slowed about 10-fold as compared to free aqueous diffusion (20 µm² s^–1versus 200 µm² s^–1, respectively; Allbritton et al. 1992; Yao et al. 1995). PV is freely mobile in the cytosol (Schmidt et al. 2003a), and can therefore act to speed or facilitate Ca²⁺ transport by shuttling bound Ca²⁺ ions through this ‘forest’ of immobile buffers (Stern, 1992; Roberts, 1994). When calculating parameters for CR (Table 1) we assumed that CR is similarly mobile (Edmonds et al. 2000). However, other reports indicate that some CR molecules may bind in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner to membrane constituents (Winsky & Kuznicki, 1995; Hubbard & McHugh, 1995).

In comparison to PV, few quantitative data are available for CR. Based on observations that CR is sufficiently fast to influence presynaptic Ca²⁺ signalling (Edmonds et al. 2000) we assumed (Table 1) that its Ca²⁺-binding kinetics would be comparable to those of BAPTA. However, this is likely to be an oversimplification. In contrast to the single binding site of BAPTA, CR contains five Ca²⁺-binding sites which – by analogy with a closely related protein calbindin D-28k (Nagerl et al. 2000) – are likely to possess different binding properties and may display cooperative rather than independent binding (G. Faas, unpublished observation).

Actions of CaBP and exogenous buffers on IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signalling in oocytes

To facilitate comparison between the actions of endogenous CaBP and those of exogenous synthetic Ca²⁺ buffers, we present in Fig. 7 a summary of the present results overlaid with results from Dargan & Parker (2003) obtained using EGTA and BAPTA. Data are grouped comparing slow (EGTA and PV) and fast (BAPTA and CR) buffers. Moreover, concentrations of buffers are normalized by expressing them as the equivalent concentration of functional binding sites. For example, 100 µM EGTA, which has a single binding site, corresponds to 100 µM binding sites; whereas 100 µM CR, with five functional sites (Stevens & Rogers, 1997), is equivalent to 500 µM.

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7.  Comparison of actions of synthetic Ca2+ buffers and CaBPs on IP3-evoked Ca2+ signals Graphs summarize data obtained using PV (light blue) and CR (green), together with data taken from Dargan & Parker (2003) obtained previously using EGTA (red) and BAPTA (dark blue). In order to facilitate comparison, buffer concentrations are expressed as the equivalent concentration of Ca2+ binding sites (see text for further explanation). Further, all fluorescence data are scaled relative to the maximum of the peak signal obtained at high [IP3] before loading buffer. Control measurements (before loading buffer) are indicated in black. Different batches of control oocytes were used for each buffer, but the inset plot in A shows that normalized control data from these four groups matched closely. For clarity, control data points are shown only in the lower panels of A and B, and the fitted control Hill curves are replicated in the other panels. A, plots show the peak amplitude of Ca2+ signals as a function of normalized photolysis flash duration for three different concentrations of slow buffers (EGTA and PV). B, corresponding concentration–response relationships for the ‘fast’ buffers BAPTA and CR. C, data derived from the Hill curves in A and B showing changes in apparent cooperativity of IP3 action, Vmax and EC50 as a result of increasing concentrations of buffers. Horizontal black lines mark control values in the absence of added buffer. Hill coefficients varied between about 4.5 and 10.5 among the different batches of control oocytes, and the cooperativity is therefore expressed as a percentage of that in each respective control group. Similarly, values of Vmax are scaled as a percentage of each control group.

The case with fast buffers is more complex. The effects of CR in some respects resemble those of BAPTA, in that both promote spatially diffuse and slowly decaying Ca²⁺ signals at high [IP₃], reduce the apparent cooperativity for IP₃ action, and diminish the amplitude of responses to maximal [IP₃] (Fig. 7C). In other regards, however, CR and BAPTA differ considerably. CR uniquely potentiates responses to low [IP₃], causing a leftward shift in the concentration–response relationship (Fig. 7B) and a corresponding decrease in EC₅₀ (Fig. 7C). Moreover, these responses at low [IP₃] are evident as localized Ca²⁺ puffs, whereas we never observed local signals in the presence of BAPTA (Dargan & Parker, 2003).

Mechanisms of CaBP action on IP₃/Ca²⁺ signalling

Under physiological conditions, PV has an on-rate (k_on) comparable to EGTA: thus, a Ca²⁺ ion can diffuse about 1 µm in the presence of 100 µM PV before it is captured (Dargan & Parker, 2003). PV should therefore be capable of disrupting Ca²⁺ communication whilst sparing short-range intracluster Ca²⁺ feedback (Roberts, 1994; Horne & Meyer, 1997; Song et al. 1998; Callamaras et al. 1998a,b; Kidd et al. 1999). By virtue of its slow binding kinetics, PV is expected to render captured Ca²⁺ ions unavailable for CICR for prolonged periods (Falcke, 2003) (t_dwell1 s), during which time it can shuttle them long distances (d_shuttle= 16 µm) before ‘dumping’ them deep in the interior of the oocyte where release sites are absent (Callamaras & Parker, 1999). The overall effect of PV would therefore be to functionally uncouple neighbouring clusters by reducing free [Ca²⁺] between them, thus sharply restricting Ca²⁺ signals around individual release sites. In agreement, PV strongly inhibited Ca²⁺ waves, dissociating global IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals into discrete, localized Ca²⁺ release events (John et al. 2001; Figs 5 and 6). Associated with this, the apparent cooperativity for IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ liberation decreased markedly – with a Hill coefficient reducing from 7 to 2 at high [PV]– suggesting that CICR between clusters contributes markedly to the cooperativity under normal conditions, and that the binding of two (or possibly one) molecule of IP₃ to the tetrameric IP₃R is sufficient for channel opening (Dargan & Parker, 2003).

As with EGTA, PV caused a marked acceleration in decay of global Ca²⁺ signals – an effect that appears to arise because both of these slow buffers inhibit a slow tail of Ca²⁺ liberation that lingers during the falling phase of a wave. We had previously proposed that this slow tail component of Ca²⁺ liberation is maintained by cluster–cluster interactions, precisely because it was inhibited by a slow buffer that was expected to disrupt such interactions. However, the present finding (Fig. 6) that puffs normally show a biphasic decay in the absence of added buffer, and that the slow tail component is abolished by PV (but not CR), suggest that the prolonged phase of Ca²⁺ liberation may also involve the properties of the IP₃ receptors themselves, or their interactions within a cluster.

Interpretation of the actions of CR is more difficult, both because this ‘fast’ CaBP did not simply mimic the actions of the stereotypical fast buffer BAPTA (Dargan & Parker, 2003), and because of the complex and poorly characterized Ca²⁺-binding kinetics and other properties of CR. In the case of BAPTA we had proposed that it binds Ca²⁺ ions diffusing over nanometer distances within an IP₃R cluster, thereby disrupting CICR between individual IP₃Rs, and subsequently facilitates Ca²⁺ communication between clusters by rapidly shuttling Ca²⁺ ions over distances of a few micrometres (Dargan & Parker, 2003). However, this scheme would not account for the specific abilities of CR to balkanize Ca²⁺ signals as individual puffs at low [IP₃] as discussed above, nor to sensitize responses to low [IP₃]. Even though the fast site(s) of CR are believed to have roughly comparable on-rate(s) (k_on) for Ca²⁺ binding to BAPTA (Edmonds et al. 2000; Table 1), other sites are probably much slower and may at least partly account for these differences. Moreover, the actions of CR may be further complicated if a fraction of this CaBP is immobilized (Winsky & Kuznicki, 1995; Hubbard & McHugh, 1995) and if CR shows cooperative Ca²⁺ binding. Finally, we cannot exclude the possibility that CR may interact directly with IP₃Rs to modulate their functioning, as described for calmodulin-like neuronal Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Yang et al. 2002; Kasri et al. 2003). Clearly, a detailed kinetic characterization of CR and other complex CaBPs will be needed before we can hope to elucidate the mechanistic basis of their varying actions on IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals.

Physiological implications

Our findings highlight the importance of CaBPs in shaping the spatiotemporal properties of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals – effects that are more complex than for signals arising from a fixed ‘pulse’ of Ca²⁺ as with Ca²⁺ entry through voltage-gated channels (e.g. Lee et al. 2000a). CaBPs (such as PV and CR) are found in mammalian cells at concentrations ranging from 50 µM to 2 mM (Plogmann & Celio, 1993; Schwaller et al. 2002). We show that PV and CR, even at concentrations (25–250 µM) at the lower end of this range, strongly influence IP₃-mediated Ca²⁺ signalling in the Xenopus oocyte model cell system. Most importantly, PV and CR produce specific and strikingly different effects that may arise largely because differences in their binding kinetics confer differential actions on CICR within and between clusters of IP₃Rs. Our results suggest that the concentration and buffering kinetics of CaBPs expressed by a cell are important for tuning the spatiotemporal properties of both local and global IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals, as well as determining the sensitivity and cooperativity of IP₃ action and for conferring a threshold for the ability of the cell to transition from a local to a global mode of Ca²⁺ signalling. It is therefore highly likely that cell-specific expression of CaBPs may serve to shape intracellular Ca²⁺ signals for specific physiological roles. Moreover, although our results concern only IP₃-evoked signals, it should be noted that ryanodine receptors (RyRs), the other major type of intracellular Ca²⁺ release channel, also communicate via CICR (Berridge, 1997), and may therefore be susceptible to similar ‘shaping’ by CaBPs.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Allbritton NL, Meyer T & Stryer L (1992). Range of messenger action of calcium ion and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Science 258, 1812–1815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Andressen C, Blumcke I & Celio MR (1993). Calcium-binding proteins: selective markers of nerve cells. Cell Tissue Res 271, 181–208.[CrossRef][Medline]

Baimbridge KG, Celio MR & Rogers JH (1992). Calcium binding proteins in the nervous system. Trends Neurosci 15, 303–308.[CrossRef][Medline]

Berridge MJ (1997). Elementary and global aspects of calcium signalling. J Physiol 499, 291–306.[Free Full Text]

Berridge MJ, Lipp P & Bootman MD (2000). The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1, 11–21.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bezprozvanny I, Watras J & Ehrlich BE (1991). Bell-shaped calcium-response curves of Ins(1,4,5)P₃- and calcium-gated channels from endoplasmic reticulum of cerebellum. Nature 351, 751–754.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bootman M, Niggli E, Berridge M & Lipp P (1997). Imaging the hierarchical Ca²⁺ signalling system in HeLa cells. J Physiol 499, 307–314.[Medline]

Callamaras N, Marchant JS, Sun XP & Parker I (1998a). Activation and co-ordination of InsP₃-mediated elementary Ca²⁺ events during global Ca²⁺ signals in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol 509, 81–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Callamaras N & Parker I (1998). Caged inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate for studying release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores. Meth Enzymol 291, 380–403.[Medline]

Callamaras N & Parker I (1999). Radial localization of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-sensitive Ca²⁺ release sites in Xenopus oocytes resolved by axial confocal linescan imaging. J General Physiol 113, 199–213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Callamaras N, Sun XP, Ivorra I & Parker I (1998b). Hemispheric asymmetry of macroscopic and elementary calcium signals mediated by InsP₃ in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol 511, 395–405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cheung WY (1980). Calmodulin plays a pivotal role in cellular regulation. Science 207, 19–27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dargan SL & Parker I (2003). Buffer kinetics shape the spatiotemporal patterns of IP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals. J Physiol; DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.054247.

Dawson SP, Keizer J & Pearson JE (1999). Fire-diffuse-fire model of dynamics of intracellular calcium waves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 6060–6063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eberhard M & Erne P (1994). Calcium and magnesium binding to rat parvalbumin. Eur J Biochem 222, 21–26.[Medline]

Edmonds B, Reyes R, Schwaller B & Roberts WM (2000). Calretinin modifies presynaptic calcium signalling in frog saccular hair cells. Nat Neurosci 3, 786–790.[CrossRef][Medline]

Falcke M (2003). Buffers and oscillations in intracellular Ca²⁺ dynamics. Biophys J 84, 28–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fill M & Copello JA (2002). Ryanodine receptor calcium release channels. Physiol Rev 82, 893–922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Finch EA, Turner TJ & Goldin SM (1991). Calcium as a coagonist of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-induced calcium release. Science 252, 443–446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haiech J, Derancourt J, Pechere JF & Demaille JG (1979). Magnesium and calcium binding to parvalbumins: evidence for differences between parvalbumins and an explanation of their relaxing function. Biochemistry 18, 2752–2758.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hirota J, Michikawa T, Miyawaki A, Furuichi T, Okura I & Mikoshiba K (1995). Kinetics of calcium release by immunoaffinity-purified inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor in reconstituted lipid vesicles. J Biol Chem 270, 19046–19051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Horne JH & Meyer T (1997). Elementary calcium-release units induced by inositol trisphosphate. Science 276, 1690–1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hubbard MJ & McHugh NJ (1995). Calbindin 28kDa and calbindin 30kDa (calretinin) are substantially localised in the particulate fraction of rat brain. FEBS Lett 374, 333–337.[CrossRef][Medline]

Iino M (1990). Biphasic Ca²⁺ dependence of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-induced Ca²⁺ release in smooth muscle cells of the guinea pig taenia caeci. J General Physiol 95, 1103–1122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

John LM, Mosquera-Caro M, Camacho P & Lechleiter JD (2001). Control of IP₃-mediated Ca²⁺ puffs in Xenopus laevis oocytes by the Ca²⁺-binding protein parvalbumin. J Physiol 535, 3–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kasri NN, Holmes AM, Bultynck G, Parys JB, Bootman MD, Rietdorf K, Missiaen L, et al. (2003). Regulation of InsP₃ receptor activity by neuronal Ca²⁺-binding proteins. EMBO J; PMID: 14685260.

Kidd JF, Fogarty KE, Tuft RA & Thorn P (1999). The role of Ca²⁺ feedback in shaping InsP₃-evoked Ca²⁺ signals in mouse pancreatic acinar cells. J Physiol 520, 187–201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lechleiter JD & Clapham DE (1992). Molecular mechanisms of intracellular calcium excitability in X. laevis oocytes. Cell 69, 283–294.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lee SH, Rosenmund C, Schwaller B & Neher E (2000a). Differences in Ca²⁺ buffering properties between excitatory and inhibitory hippocampal neurons from the rat. J Physiol 525, 405–418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee SH, Schwaller B & Neher E (2000b). Kinetics of Ca²⁺ binding to parvalbumin in bovine chromaffin cells: implications for [Ca²⁺] transients of neuronal dendrites. J Physiol 525, 419–432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mak DO, McBride S & Foskett JK (1998). Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate activation of inositol trisphosphate receptor Ca²⁺ channel by ligand tuning of Ca²⁺ inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 15821–15825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marchant JS & Parker I (2000). Functional interactions in Ca²⁺ signalling over different time and distance scales. J General Physiol 116, 691–696.[Free Full Text]

Marchant JS & Taylor CW (1997). Cooperative activation of IP₃ receptors by sequential binding of IP₃ and Ca²⁺ safeguards against spontaneous activity. Curr Biol 7, 510–518.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meinrenken CJ, Borst GG & Sakmann B (2003). Local routes revisited: the space and time dependence of the Ca²⁺ signal for phasic transmitter release at the rat calyx of Held. J Physiol 547, 665–689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meyer T, Wensel T & Stryer L (1990). Kinetics of calcium channel opening by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Biochemistry 29, 32–37.[CrossRef][Medline]

Morris SA, Correa V, Cardy TJ, O'Beirne G & Taylor CW (1999). Interactions between inositol trisphosphate receptors and fluorescent Ca²⁺ indicators. Cell Calcium 25, 137–142.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nagerl UV, Novo D, Mody I & Vergara JL (2000). Binding kinetics of calbindin-D(28k) determined by flash photolysis of caged Ca²⁺. Biophys J 79, 3009–3018.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Naraghi M (1997). T-jump study of calcium binding kinetics of calcium chelators. Cell Calcium 22, 255–268.[CrossRef][Medline]

Neher E (2000). Calcium buffers in flash-light. Biophys J 79, 2783–2784.[Free Full Text]

Parker I, Callamaras N & Wier WG (1997). A high-resolution, confocal laser-scanning microscope and flash photolysis system for physiological studies. Cell Calcium 21, 441–452.[CrossRef][Medline]

Parker I, Yao Y & Ilyin V (1996). Fast kinetics of calcium liberation induced in Xenopus oocytes by photoreleased inositol trisphosphate. Biophys J 70, 222–237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Parys JB, Sernett SW, DeLisle S, Snyder PM, Welsh MJ & Campbell KP (1992). Isolation, characterization, and localization of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor protein in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Biol Chem 267, 18776–18782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pauls T, Drussel J, Cox JA, Clark ID, Szabo AG, Gange SM, Sykes BD & Berchtold MW (1993). Metal binding properties of recombinant rat parvalbumin wild-type and F102W mutant. J Biol Chem 268, 20897–20903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Plogmann D & Celio MR (1993). Intracellular concentration of parvalbumin in nerve cells. Brain Res 600, 273–279.[CrossRef][Medline]

Roberts WM (1994). Localization of calcium signals by a mobile calcium buffer in frog saccular hair cells. J Neurosci 14, 3246–3262.[Abstract]

Schmidt H, Brown EB, Schwaller B & Eilers J (2003a). Diffusional mobility of parvalbumin in spiny dendrites of cerebellar Purkinje neurons quantified by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophys J 84, 2599–2608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmidt H, Stiefel KM, Racay P, Schwaller B & Eilers J (2003b). Mutational analysis of dendritic Ca²⁺ kinetics in cerebellar Purkinje cells: role of parvalbumin and calbindin D28k. J Physiol 551, 13–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schwaller B, Durussel I, Jermann D, Herrmann B & Cox JA (1997). Comparison of the Ca²⁺ binding properties of human recombinant calretinin-22k and calretinin. J Biol Chem 272, 29663–29671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schwaller B, Meyer M & Schiffmann S (2002). ‘New’ functions for ‘old’ proteins: The role of the calcium binding proteins calbindin D-28k, calretinin and parvalbumin, in cerebellar physiology. Studies with knockout mice. Cerebellum 1, 241–258.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shuai JW & Jung P (2002). Stochastic properties of Ca²⁺ release of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor clusters. Biophys J 83, 87–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shuai JW & Jung P (2003). Optimal ion channel clustering for intracellular calcium signalling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 506–510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Simpson PB, Mehotra S, Lange GD & Russell JT (1997). High density distribution of endoplasmic reticulum proteins and mitochondria at specialized Ca²⁺ release sites in oligodendrocyte processes. J Biol Chem 272, 22654–22661.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Song LS, Sham JS, Stern MD, Lakatta EG & Cheng H (1998). Direct measurement of SR release flux by tracking ‘Ca²⁺ spikes’ in rat cardiac myocytes. J Physiol 512, 677–691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stern MD (1992). Buffering of calcium in the vicinity of a channel pore. Cell Calcium 13, 183–192.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stevens J & Rogers JH (1997). Chick calretinin: purification, composition, and metal binding activity of native and recombinant forms. Protein Expr Purif 9, 171–181.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sun XP, Callamaras N, Marchant JS & Parker I (1998). A continuum of InsP₃-mediated elementary Ca²⁺ signalling events in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol 509, 67–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Swillens S, Dupont G, Combettes L & Champeil P (1999). From calcium blips to calcium puffs: theoretical analysis of the requirements for interchannel communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 13750–13755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vetter SW & Leclerc E (2003). Novel aspects of calmodulin target recognition and activation. Eur J Biochem 270, 404–414.[Medline]

Winsky L & Kuznicki J (1995). Distribution of calretinin, calbindin D28k and parvalbumin in subcellular fractions of rat cerebellum: effects of calcium. J Neurochem 65, 381–388.[Medline]

Yang J, McBride S, Mak DO, Vardi N, Palczewski K, Haeseleer F & Foskett JK (2002). Identification of a family of calcium sensors as protein ligands of inositol trisphosphate receptor Ca²⁺ release channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 7711–7716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yao Y, Choi J & Parker I (1995). Quantal puffs of intracellular Ca²⁺ evoked by inositol trisphosphate in Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol 482, 533–553.<