|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 University Laboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK
2 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
3 Medizinische Universitätsklinik Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
70 and
60 mV, and peaked at 30 and 10 mV, with a current density of 22 ± 3 and 18 ± 1 pA pF1, respectively. TTX-sensitive iNa inactivated at more positive potentials as compared to TTX-resistant iNa. Using action potential clamp, TTX-sensitive iNa was observed to activate late during the pacemaker potential. Using immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy, different distributions of the TTX-resistant cardiac isoform, Nav1.5, and the TTX-sensitive neuronal isoform, Nav1.1, were observed: Nav1.5 was absent from the centre of the SA node, but present in the periphery of the SA node, whereas Nav1.1 was present throughout the SA node. Nanomolar concentrations (10 or 100 nM) of TTX, which block TTX-sensitive iNa, slowed pacemaking in both intact SA node preparations and isolated SA node cells without a significant effect on SA node conduction. In contrast, micromolar concentrations (130 µM) of TTX, which block TTX-resistant iNa as well as TTX-sensitive iNa, slowed both pacemaking and SA node conduction. It is concluded that two Na+ channel isoforms are important for the functioning of the SA node: neuronal (putative Nav1.1) and cardiac Nav1.5 isoforms are involved in pacemaking, although the cardiac Nav1.5 isoform alone is involved in the propagation of the action potential from the SA node to the surrounding atrial muscle.
(Received 25 May 2004;
accepted after revision 12 July 2004;
first published online 14 July 2004)
Corresponding author M. Lei: University Laboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. Email: ming.lei{at}physiol.ox.ac.uk
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During the last decade, significant progress has been made in understanding the molecular basis of voltage-gated Na+ channels. They are composed of pore-forming
(Nav) subunits and auxiliary ß subunits (Catterall, 2000; Goldin et al. 2000; Goldin, 2001). Ten
subunits and four ß subunits have been identified so far (Goldin, 2001; Yu & Catterall, 2003). Different
subunit isoforms are expressed in different tissues and have different pharmacological properties (Goldin, 2001). Nav1.5 is mainly expressed in cardiac tissue and is inhibited by micromolar concentrations of tetrodotoxin (TTX), whereas Nav1.1, Nav1.2, Nav1.3 and Nav1.6 are mainly expressed in the central nervous system and are inhibited by nanomolar concentrations of TTX, as is the isoform expressed in skeletal muscle (Nav1.4). However, a neuronal Na+ channel (Nav1.1) has been reported in the SA node in the newborn rabbit (Baruscotti et al. 1997a). Neuronal Na+ channels are also present in the adult heart: multiple neuronal Na+ channel isoforms (Nav1.1, Nav1.3, Nav1.6), as well as Nav1.5, are expressed in adult mouse ventricular myocytes and are involved in excitationcontraction coupling (Maier et al. 2002b). In another recent study, TTX-sensitive neuronal Na+ channel isoforms have been shown to be expressed in the adult mouse and adult rat SA node and block of the channels has been shown to lead to a slowing of the heart rate in the isolated mouse heart (Maier et al. 2003). Although these recent studies highlight possible roles of neuronal Na+ channels in the adult heart, including SA node pacemaking, Na+ current through the channels has not been recorded under physiological conditions. Therefore, it is unclear whether the properties of neuronal Na+ channels are appropriate for them to contribute to the relatively positive pacemaker potentials in SA node cells.
The aim of the present study was to study iNa in adult mouse SA node cells. In isolated SA node cells, we have shown that both Nav1.1 and Nav1.5 can be expressed and there are corresponding TTX-sensitive and -resistant Na+ currents. The TTX-sensitive (putative Nav1.1) current has appropriate properties for it to be involved in the pacemaker potential. Experiments on the intact SA node show that Nav1.1 and Nav1.5 are both involved in pacemaking, but only Nav1.5 is involved in action potential propagation.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells were isolated from the mouse SA node based on the method for isolation of rabbit SA node cells previously described (Lei & Brown, 1996; Lei et al. 2002a,b). Briefly, 2030 g C57BL/6J adult mice (age, 1012 weeks; from Charles River UK Ltd, Kent, UK) were killed by cervical dislocation and the heart quickly removed and washed by Langendorff perfusion for 510 min using oxygenated Tyrode solution. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986. The right atrium was cut from the heart and placed in a dissection chamber perfused with Tyrode solution and illuminated from below. A thin strip of SA node tissue (
0.2 mm x 0.8 mm), limited by the crista terminalis, the atrial septum and the orifices of the venae cavae, was cut from the right atrium and allowed to regain spontaneous activity. The SA node tissue strip was incubated for 5 min in Ca2+-free Tyrode solution, incubated for 2030 min in enzyme-containing Ca2+-free Tyrode solution (230 units ml1 Type I collagenase; 15 units ml1 Type IIA elastase; Sigma, Poole, UK) and, finally, washed and stored in Kraft-Brühe (KB) medium at 4°C for at least 1 h.
Whole-cell current and voltage clamp
Cells were superfused with Tyrode solution at 37°C at a rate of 2 ml min1 via a heat exchanger. SA node cells were identified by their characteristic morphology and spontaneous activity. The whole-cell patch clamp technique was used for electrical recording from single cells with amphotericin-permeabilized or ruptured patches. Pipettes (tip diameter,
12 µm; resistance, 12 M
for ruptured patch and 25 M
for amphotericin-permeabilized patch) were made from 1 mm diameter glass (Clark Electromedical Instruments, Reading, UK) using a Narishige pipette puller (PP-830, Narishige Scientific Instruments Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan). Amphotericin 200 µg ml1 was added to the pipette solution just before use. An Axopatch-200B patch clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments Inc., Union City, CA, USA) was used for current and voltage clamp. Cell capacitance (Cm) was obtained from the capacity compensation control of the amplifier after the whole-cell capacity current (in response to 5 ms pulses to 70 mV at 100 Hz from a holding potential of 60 mV) was eliminated. The series resistance was electronically compensated (> 80%) and the current signal was filtered by a low pass Bessel filter with a cut-off frequency of 5 kHz (3 dB). Data were digitized at 12 kHz using a Digidata 1200A A/D converter (Axon Instruments Inc.) and stored on a computer for later analysis using pCLAMP version 8.2 software (Axon Instruments Inc.).
For action potential clamp, experiments were carried out, with some modifications, using the technique described by Doerr et al. (1989). In the current clamp mode, spontaneous action potentials were recorded for 3060 s after a stable perforated whole-cell configuration was achieved. After switching to the voltage clamp mode, the pre-recorded action potentials were applied to the same cell as the command waveform.
Electrical mapping
Dissection of the intact SA node was carried out as previously described (Lei et al. 2001, 2002a). The preparation was superfused with Tyrode solution at 37°C at a rate of 56 ml min1 via a heat exchanger. Extracellular potentials and intracellular action potentials were recorded by bipolar electrodes and conventional microelectrodes (resistance,
30 M
), respectively, as described by Yamamoto et al. (1998). Electrical signals were digitized at 5 kHz by a DigiData 1322A A/D converter (Axon Instruments Inc.) and stored on a computer for later analysis.
Solutions
Normal Tyrode solution (mM): 140 NaCl; 5.4 KCl; 1.8 CaCl2; 1 MgCl2; 10 glucose; 5 Hepes (pH 7.4 with NaOH). For recording iNa, NaCl was reduced to 67 mM (NaCl replaced by CsCl) and 300 nM nisoldipine was added to solutions to block iCa,L; 40 µM NiCl was added to block iCa,T in some experiments. KB solution (mM): 25 KCl; 0.5 EGTA; 3 MgCl2; 80 L-glutamic acid; 20 taurine; 10 KH2PO4; 10 glucose; 10 Hepes (pH 7.4 with KOH). The pipette solution for ruptured whole-cell recording contained (mM): 10 NaCl; 140 KCl; 1 MgCl2; 5 MgATP; 2 EGTA; 10 Hepes (pH 7.3 with KOH). The pipette solution for amphotericin-permeabilized whole-cell recording contained (mM): 140 KCl; 1.8 MgSO4; 0.1 EGTA; 5 Hepes (pH 7.3 with KOH); prior to use, amphotericin was added as described above.
Immunocytochemistry
Immunocytochemistry was carried out on isolated cells and tissue sections as previously described (Musa et al. 2002). Ventricular and atrial cells were isolated as previously described (Ashley et al. 2002) and SA node cells were isolated as described above. Cells were plated onto collagen-treated slides and allowed to settle for 30 min. The intact SA node was dissected as previously described (Lei, 2001b, 2002) and then frozen. Tissue sections (8.0 µm; through the crista terminalis and the SA node) were cut perpendicular to the crista terminalis using a cryostat (Leica CM900, Wetzlar, Germany). Cells and sections were fixed in 10% formalin (Sigma) for 30 min, washed three times with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) over 30 min, permeabilized by 0.1% Triton X-100 (BDH, Poole, UK) for 30 min, washed three times with PBS over 30 min, and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma) and 10% normal donkey serum (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA) in PBS for 12 h before application of primary antibody. Primary antibodies were diluted in 1% BSA and 2% normal donkey serum in PBS. Cells and sections were incubated with primary antibody (at an appropriate concentration) at 4°C overnight. Cells and sections were briefly washed in PBS and then FITC or Cy3-labelled donkey anti-rabbit or donkey anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Chemicon International) were applied. For double labelling, sections were incubated with a mixture of primary antibodies (raised in different species) and then an appropriate mixture of secondary antibodies. Cells and sections were washed three times with PBS and then mounted with Vectashield (H-1000 or H1300; Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK) and coverslips were sealed with nail polish. In control experiments on isolated cells and tissue sections, primary antibodies were preincubated with their antigenic peptides or no primary antibody was used and no labelling was detected.
Antibodies
Rabbit anti-connexin43 (Cx43; Sigma) was used at a dilution of 1: 500; mouse anti-desmoplakin I and II (Progen, Heidelberg, Germany) was used as supplied; rabbit anti-HCN4 (Alomone Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel) was used at a dilution of 1: 100; rabbit anti-Nav1.1, anti-Nav1.2, anti-Nav1.3, anti-Nav1.5 and anti-Nav1.6 (Alomone Laboratories) were used at a dilution of 1: 50; rabbit anti-Nav1.5 (kindly provided by Dr W. A. Catterall, University of Washington, Seattle, USA) was used at dilutions of 1: 50 and 1: 100. The specificity of anti-Nav1.1, anti-Nav1.2, anti-Nav1.3, anti-Nav1.5 and anti-Nav1.6 was previously described (Planells-Cases et al. 2000; Malhotra et al. 2001; Maier et al. 2002b, 2003).
Confocal microscopy
Images were acquired using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 510; Zeiss, Germany) equipped with argon and heliumneon lasers, which allowed excitation at 488 and 568 nm wavelengths for the detection of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and Cy3, respectively. The images recorded were single optical sections and, in the case of double labelling, the images were recorded sequentially. The images were saved and then processed using Corel Photo-Paint and Corel Draw software (Corel, Ottawa, Canada).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as means ±S.E.M. (number of preparations or cells). Differences were evaluated by Student's t test and a difference was considered significant if P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells from the SA node were identified by their characteristic size, shape and morphology as well as spontaneous electrical activity. Current was recorded during 20 ms pulses to potentials between 90 (or 70) and +30 mV from a holding potential of 120 (or 80) mV. iNa was recorded in all SA node cells studied. In three cells (holding potential, 80 mV), the current was abolished by 30 µM TTX (sufficient to block both TTX-sensitive and -resistant Na+ channels; data not shown). The current was also Na+ dependent: in 67 mM Na+ the peak current density was 40 ± 3 pA pF1 (holding potential, 120 mV; n= 9), whereas in 140 mM Na+ it was 74 ± 20 pA pF1 (holding potential, 80 mV; n= 6) and 103 ± 13 pA pF1 (holding potential, 120 mV; n= 2) (data not shown). These findings demonstrate that the current was indeed iNa.
Doseresponse curves for TTX block of iNa were determined at test potentials of 60 and 10 mV from a holding potential of 120 mV; nanomolar to micromolar concentrations of TTX were used (three or four cells at each concentration were studied). At 60 mV, TTX-resistant cardiac Nav1.5 channels are activated, whereas neuronal TTX-sensitive Na+ channels are closed they are activated at more positive potentials (Smith & Goldin, 1998; Zimmer et al. 2002a,b). At 10 mV, all Na+ channel isoforms are activated. If cells contain both TTX-sensitive and -resistant Na+ channels, doseresponse curves should be different at the two test potentials with a deviation at nanomolar concentrations of TTX. The doseresponse curves are shown in Fig. 1B. At TTX concentrations between 10 and 100 nM a significantly larger fraction of Na+ channels were indeed blocked at a test potential of 10 mV compared to a test potential of 60 mV. The difference between the doseresponse curves was not the result of a voltage-dependent block of Nav1.5, because the heterologously expressed Nav1.5 channel exhibits an indistinguishable block at both potentials (T. Zimmer, personal communication). These results suggest that two components of iNa, TTX sensitive and resistant, exist in mouse SA node cells. The doseresponse curve at 60 mV is well fitted with a Hill curve (with a Hill coefficient of 1) with a KD of 0.4 µM (Fig. 1B). This is consistent with published values of the KD for TTX-resistant iNa (26 µM; Goldin, 2001). The doseresponse curve at 10 mV is well fitted with a double Hill curve (Fig. 1B): if it is assumed that the KD of TTX-resistant current is 0.4 µM (and the Hill coefficients of both TTX-resistant and -sensitive currents is 1), the KD of the TTX-sensitive current is 2.2 nM (and the fractions of TTX-resistant and -sensitive currents are 0.7 and 0.3, respectively). The KD of the TTX-sensitive current is consistent with published values (110 nm; Goldin, 2001).
|
|
70,
60 and
70 mV, and peaked at 20, 10 and 30 mV, with a current density of 40 ± 3, 18 ± 1 and 22 ± 3 pA pF1, respectively (n= 9; cell capacitance, Cm= 3055 pF). There was a substantial variation in the density of iNa from cell to cell. Cells in the centre of the SA node are small as compared to those in the periphery (Boyett et al. 2000). The capacitance (Cm; a measure of cell size) of 11 cells studied varied from 30 to 61 pF and there was a significant correlation between the density of total iNa and Cm (R2, 0.59; P < 0.05) and the density of TTX-resistant iNa and Cm (R2, 0.57; P < 0.05), but not between the density of TTX-sensitive iNa and Cm (Fig. 2K). This suggests that the density of TTX-resistant, but not TTX-sensitive, iNa may vary from the centre to the periphery of the SA node. Note that for small cells (presumably from the centre of the SA node), the densities of TTX-resistant and -sensitive iNa were approximately equal, but in large cells (presumably from the periphery of the SA node) the density of TTX-resistant iNa was much greater than the density of TTX-sensitive iNa. Inactivation curves for TTX-sensitive (current blocked by 100 nM TTX) and -resistant (current recorded in the presence of 100 nM TTX) iNa were constructed using a standard double pulse protocol (holding potential, 120 mV; conditioning pulse potential, 120 to 20 mV; conditioning pulse duration, 100 ms; conditioning pulsetest pulse interval, 0 ms; test pulse potential, 30 mV; test pulse duration, 10 ms; conditioningtest pulse repetition rate, 2 Hz). Figure 2LN shows families of test pulse currents for total iNa, TTX-resistant iNa and TTX-sensitive iNa and Fig. 2O shows inactivation curves for TTX-sensitive and -resistant iNa. Inactivation curves were fitted by the Boltzmann equation as described above. The V1/2 and k values for inactivation were 56 ± 2 and 3 ± 1 mV for TTX-sensitive iNa and 65 ± 5 and 6 ± 1 mV for TTX-resistant iNa. The activation and inactivation curves overlap (corresponding to window current) (Fig. 2O) the overlap for TTX-sensitive iNa occurs at more positive potentials than for TTX-resistant iNa (Fig. 2O).
To explore the role of TTX-sensitive iNa, action potential clamp experiments were successfully conducted on three cells. Figure 3 shows a representative experiment. The action potentials in Fig. 3A were recorded in current-clamp mode before switching to voltage clamp, and were used as the command waveform in the same cell for current recording. After a steady pattern of current was obtained under control conditions (Fig. 3B), 50 nM TTX was applied (sufficient to block TTX-sensitive iNa, with little effect on TTX-resistant iNa). This resulted in an increase in the net outward current due to block of the TTX-sensitive inward current during the action potential. The change in current was not due to rundown, because the current returned to the control pattern after wash-off of TTX (not shown). The TTX-sensitive current during the action potential was obtained by subtracting current in the presence of TTX from the control current (Fig. 3D). The action potential command waveform and the TTX-sensitive current are shown at a fast time base in Fig. 3E. Figure 3E shows that the TTX-sensitive current (iNa) started late during diastole. The currentvoltage relationship in Fig. 3F (in which the TTX-sensitive current is plotted against the membrane potential during the action potential command waveform) shows that the TTX-sensitive current started to activate at
50 mV. This is consistent with the threshold of the TTX-sensitive iNa measured with square voltage clamp pulses (Fig. 2I). Figure 3F also shows that the TTX-sensitive current reached a peak during the action potential upstroke and was inactivated by the peak of the action potential. This is the first time TTX-sensitive iNa has been recorded under action potential clamp.
|
To examine the molecular basis of TTX-sensitive and -resistant iNa,
100 isolated SA node cells were immunolabelled for Nav1.1, Nav1.2, Nav1.3, Nav1.5 and Nav1.6. Figure 4 shows punctate labelling of the TTX-sensitive Nav1.1 along the cell membrane of small (Fig. 4A) and large (Fig. 4B) SA node cells. Nuclear labelling by anti-Nav1.1 was also observed this presumably was non-specific labelling. There was labelling of the TTX-resistant Nav1.5 along the cell membrane in large (Fig. 4F), but not small (Fig. 4E), SA node cells (labelling of Nav1.5 in ventricular and atrial cells is also shown in Fig. 4C and D). No labelling of Nav1.2 was observed in SA node cells (Fig. 4G and H). Figure 4I shows labelling of Nav1.2 in brain tissue this proves that the antibody used is effective. No labelling of Nav1.3 was observed in SA node cells (Fig. 4J and K shows labelling of Nav1.3 in brain tissue). Finally, no labelling of Nav1.6 was observed in SA node cells (Fig. 4L and M).
|
|
To address the roles of the TTX-sensitive and -resistant iNa in SA node pacemaking, nanomolar or micromolar concentrations of TTX were applied to intact SA node preparations and isolated SA node cells. Under control conditions, the intact SA node preparations showed regular spontaneous activity with a cycle length of 178 ± 4 ms (n= 22). Figure 6 shows typical examples of extracellular potentials and action potentials recorded in and around the SA node (Fig. 6A) and a typical activation map (Fig. 6B). Spontaneous action potentials were initiated in the centre of the SA node and from here they propagated to the crista terminalis and the interatrial septum (Fig. 6A and B). Figure 6C shows extracellular potentials from the centre and periphery of the SA node (recording sites a and b in Fig. 6B) in the presence of different concentrations of TTX. TTX at 10 and 100 nM resulted in significant increases in the cycle length of 6 ± 2% (from 175 ± 5 ms to 187 ± 3 ms; P < 0.05, n= 4) and 22 ± 8% (from 184 ± 6 to 221 ± 18 ms; P < 0.05, n= 6). TTX at 30 µM caused a greater increase in the cycle length at the leading pacemaker site in the centre of the SA node of 44 ± 13% from 158 ± 8 to 240 ± 22 ms (P < 0.01, n= 5). These results suggest that rate is approximately equally dependent on TTX-sensitive and -resistant iNa: of the increase in cycle length produced by block of both currents by 30 µM TTX,
51% was produced by block of TTX-sensitive iNa alone by 100 nM TTX. Although pacemaking at the leading pacemaker site in the centre of the SA node persisted in micromolar concentrations of TTX, in all preparations (n= 6) 1030 µM TTX abolished activity in the peripheral region of the SA node (Fig. 6C).
|
The effect of TTX on the spontaneous electrical activity of isolated SA node cells was also investigated. A typical example is shown in Fig. 7 and mean data are shown in Table 1. Block of both TTX-sensitive and -resistant iNa by 30 µM TTX reduced the slope of the pacemaker potential and the threshold potential, and increased cycle length (Table 1). Approximately 63% of the effect of block of both TTX-sensitive and -resistant iNa by 30 µM TTX on cycle length can be attributed to block of TTX-sensitive iNa alone (the effect caused by 100 nM TTX). This confirms that rate is dependent on both TTX-sensitive and -resistant iNa. Block of both currents by 30 µM TTX also decreased the maximum upstroke velocity and the peak of the action potential (Table 1). Approximately 49% of the decrease in the maximum upstroke velocity, but just
12% of the decrease in the peak of the action potential, can be attributed to block of TTX-sensitive iNa alone. This result suggests that TTX-resistant iNa plays an equal or greater role than TTX-sensitive iNa in the action potential upstroke. Action potential conduction is dependent on the peak of the action potential (as well as the maximum upstroke velocity) and the dependence of the peak of the action potential on TTX-resistant iNa could help explain the dependence of SA node conduction on TTX-resistant iNa.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Na+ channel isoforms in the SA node
Recent studies have shown that Nav1.5 is not the only Na+ channel isoform in the adult heart and neuronal isoforms are also present (Maier et al. 2002b, 2003). Using mouse and rat tissue sections, Maier et al. (2003) showed that Nav1.5 is absent from the centre of SA node, whereas Nav1.1 is expressed throughout the SA node and surrounding atrial muscle (expression of Nav1.1 mRNA has also been shown in newborn rabbit SA node; Baruscotti et al. 1997b). Using single cells (for the first time) and tissue sections, these findings are confirmed here. In addition, in the present study, it is shown that the distribution of Nav1.5 is complex: although Nav1.5 was not expressed in small SA node cells (likely to be from the centre of the SA node) and in the region of the SA node located in the intercaval region (the centre), it was expressed in large SA node cells (likely to be from the periphery of the SA node) and in the region of the SA node located on the endocardial face of the crista terminalis (the periphery) (Figs 4 and 5).
Nav1.3 has also been reported in sections of mouse SA node (Maier et al. 2003), but not in rabbit and rat SA node (Baruscotti et al. 1997b; Maier et al. 2003). However, in the present study, we did not observe the expression of Nav1.3 in isolated mouse SA node cells, and in tissue sections labelling of Nav1.3 was only observed in nerve fibres and nerve cell bodies within and near the SA node (data not shown), which is known to be highly innervated. Labelling of Nav1.3 in nerve fibres and nerve cell bodies was also observed in rat SA node by Maier et al. (2003). The discrepancy in Nav1.3 labelling in mouse SA node between the two studies could be the result of a difference in the mouse strain used (B6/129F1 mice were used by Maier et al. 2003, while C57BL/6J mice were used in the present study) or a difference in the protocol used.
Although neuronal Na+ channels have been detected in adult heart, including the SA node, Na+ current through these channels had not been recorded under physiological conditions. In the present study, we determined doseresponse curves for TTX block of iNa in isolated mouse SA node cells as shown in Fig. 1. At TTX concentrations between 10 and 100 nM we observed a significantly greater block of iNa at 10 mV compared to that at 60 mV. The difference between the doseresponse curves at 10 and 60 mV suggests that two components of iNa exist in these cells. iNa was separated into two distinct components, TTX sensitive and TTX resistant, by their sensitivity to TTX (Fig. 2AH). TTX-sensitive iNa activated and peaked at more positive potentials compared to TTX-resistant iNa (Fig. 2J) and the V1/2 of activation and inactivation of TTX-sensitive iNa was more positive as compared to that of TTX-resistant iNa (Fig. 2I and O). These differences are in principle consistent with the properties of different Na+ channels when they are expressed exogenously: Mantegazza et al. (2001) have shown that the Nav1.5 channel activates at a potential 20 mV more negative than the neuronal Nav1.2 channel (the voltage dependence of activation of Nav1.1 and Nav1.2 is the same; Smith & Goldin, 1998). Furthermore, all neuronal Na+ channels, including Nav1.1, are known to have a more positive voltage dependence of inactivation than Nav1.5 (Goldin, 1999): Nav1.5 inactivates at a potential 25 mV more negative than Nav1.1.
Our results show that the density of total iNa varies in mouse SA node cells and density is significantly correlated with cell size and is greater in larger cells (Fig. 2K). This appears to be the result of variation in the density of TTX-resistant iNa with cell size, because the density of TTX-sensitive iNa did not vary with cell size (Fig. 2K). Because cells in the centre of the SAN are known to be smaller than those in the periphery (Boyett et al. 2000), this suggests that the density of TTX-resistant iNa (but not TTX-sensitive iNa) declines from the periphery to the centre of the SA node. This is consistent with the distributions of Nav1.5 and Nav1.1 as determined by immunolabelling: whereas Nav1.5 was not expressed in the centre of the SA node, it was expressed in the periphery; in contrast, Nav1.1 was expressed throughout the SA node and surrounding atrial muscle (see above and Figs 4 and 5).
Roles of Na+ channel isoforms in SA node pacemaking
Previously, iNa was not thought to play an important role in SA node pacemaking (Brown, 1982; Irisawa et al. 1993). However, this study and the study of Maier et al. (2003) have shown that block of TTX-sensitive neuronal Na+ channels by 100 nM TTX slows down pacemaking: the cycle length was increased in mouse intact heart by
65% (Maier et al. 2003), mouse intact SA node by 22 ± 8% (present study) and mouse isolated SA node cells by 15 ± 2% (present study). This suggests that TTX-sensitive neuronal Na+ channels play a role in SA node pacemaking. In the SA node, the centre, made up of small cells, is normally the leading pacemaker site. The TTX-sensitive Na+ channel, Nav1.1, is present throughout the SA node, including the centre (this study; Maier et al. 2003) and, in the present study, in isolated SA node cells TTX-sensitive iNa was present in large and small cells and the density of the current did not vary with cell size (Fig. 2K). TTX-sensitive iNa, more than TTX-resistant iNa, has properties appropriate for SA node pacemaking: at the relatively positive potentials (
60 mV) during the pacemaker potential, a greater fraction of TTX-sensitive iNa than TTX-resistant iNa will be available, because the inactivation curve of TTX-sensitive iNa is shifted to more positive potentials as compared to that of TTX-resistant iNa (Fig. 2I). In addition, because of overlap of the activation and inactivation curves there is expected to be window current for both TTX-sensitive and -resistant iNa. However, window current in the case of TTX-sensitive iNa is available at more positive potentials (perhaps more appropriate for pacemaking) than window current in the case of TTX-resistant iNa (Fig. 2O). In the present study, action potential clamp experiments confirmed that TTX-sensitive iNa activated during diastolic depolarization (Fig. 3). In the present study, block of TTX-resistant iNa as well as TTX-sensitive iNa by 30 µM TTX resulted in an extra slowing of pacemaking as compared to block of TTX-sensitive iNa alone by nanomolar concentrations of TTX in both the intact SA node and isolated SA node cells. This suggests that TTX-resistant iNa, as well as TTX-sensitive iNa, plays a role in SA node pacemaking. Although the properties of Nav1.5 are less appropriate for pacemaking, there can be a greater density of TTX-resistant iNa than TTX-sensitive iNa (Fig. 2K) and this perhaps explains its importance. Even in the presence of 30 µM TTX, pacemaking continued in intact SA node preparations (Fig. 6C) and isolated SA node cells (Fig. 7) and this shows that currents other than iNa are involved in pacemaking.
Roles of Na+ channel isoforms in SA node conduction
Block of both TTX-sensitive and -resistant iNa by micromolar concentrations of TTX, but not block of the TTX-sensitive iNa alone by 10 or 100 nM TTX, caused a slowing of SA node conduction (from the leading pacemaker site in the centre of the SA node to the surrounding atrial muscle via the periphery of the SA node) or even SA node conduction block (Fig. 6D). This shows an important role for TTX-resistant iNa in SA node conduction. iNa is expected to control conduction, because the conduction velocity depends on both the upstroke velocity and amplitude of the action potential and both of these are dependent on iNa (Fig. 7). The SA node conduction time, as measured in this study, will primarily depend on the periphery of the SA node and, in the periphery of the SA node, the dominant iNa is likely to be the TTX-resistant iNa (in large SA node cells, likely to be from the periphery, the density of TTX-resistant iNa was greater than that of TTX-sensitive iNa; Fig. 2K). This can explain the dependence of SA node conduction on TTX-resistant iNa. Micromolar concentrations of TTX abolished activity in the periphery, but not the centre, of the SA node. This is probably because the action potential upstroke in the periphery, but not the centre, is dependent on iNa, whereas in the centre, it is dependent on iCa,L (Kodama et al. 1997).
Physiological and clinical importance
The present study shows that Na+ channels play an important role in the functioning of the SA node and this is borne out by independent work. In the present study, block of TTX-resistant iNa (presumably through the Nav1.5 channel) resulted in a slowing of SA node pacemaking, a slowing of SA node conduction and SA node exit block (Fig. 6). These are symptoms of sick sinus syndrome (Benditt et al. 1990). In a study of the SA node from heterozygous Scn5a (gene for Nav1.5) knockout mice, a sick sinus syndrome phenotype was observed (unpublished data). Knockout of the Na+ channel ß2 subunit also results in a sick sinus syndrome phenotype (Maier et al. 2002a). Recently, a case of familial sick sinus syndrome in a patient was ascribed to a mutation in SCN5A (Benson et al. 2003).
In conclusion, two distinct Na+ channels are expressed in the SA node. Both neuronal and cardiac Na+ channels contribute to the initiation of the action potential in the SA node and, in addition, the cardiac Na+ channel is also responsible for the propagation of the action potential out of the SA node.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baruscotti M, Westenbroek R, Catterall WA, DiFrancesco D & Robinson RB (1997a). The newborn rabbit sino-atrial node expresses a neuronal type I-like Na+ channel. J Physiol 498, 641648.
Benditt D, Milstein S & Goldstein M (1990). Sinus node dysfunction: Pathophysiology, clinical features, evalution, and treatment. In Cardiac Electrophysiology. From Cell to Bedside, ed. Zips DP & Jalife J, pp. 708734. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Benson DW, Wang DW, Dyment M, Knilans TK, Fish FA, Strieper MJ, Rhodes TH & George AL Jr (2003). Congenital sick sinus syndrome caused by recessive mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene (SCN5A). J Clin Invest 112, 10191028.[CrossRef][Medline]
Boyett MR, Dobrzynski H, Lancaster MK, Jones SA, Honjo H & Kodama I (2003). Sophisticated architecture is required for the sinoatrial node to perform its normal pacemaker function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 14, 104106.[CrossRef][Medline]
Boyett MR, Honjo H & Kodama I (2000). The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure. Cardiovasc Res 47, 658687.
Brown HF (1982). Electrophysiology of the sinoatrial node. Physiol Rev 62, 505530.
Catterall WA (2000). From ionic currents to molecular mechanisms: the structure and function of voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron 26, 1325.[CrossRef][Medline]
Doerr T, Denger R & Trautwein W (1989). Calcium currents in single SA nodal cells of the rabbit heart studied with action potential clamp. Pflugers Arch 413, 599603.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goldin AL (1999). Diversity of mammalian voltage-gated sodium channels. Ann N Y Acad Sci 868, 3850.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goldin AL (2001). Resurgence of sodium channel research. Annu Rev Physiol 63, 871894.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.871[CrossRef][Medline]
Goldin AL, Barchi RL, Caldwell JH, Hofmann F, Howe JR, Hunter JC, Kallen RG, Mandel G, Meisler MH, Netter YB, Noda M, Tamkun MM, Waxman SG, Wood JN & Catterall WA (2000). Nomenclature of voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron 28, 365368.1016/S0896-6273(00)00116-1[CrossRef][Medline]
Honjo H, Boyett MR, Kodama I & Toyama J (1996). Correlation between electrical activity and the size of rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 496, 795808.
Irisawa H, Brown HF & Giles W (1993). Cardiac pacemaking in the sinoatrial node. Physiol Rev 73, 197227.
Kodama I, Nikmaram MR, Boyett MR, Suzuki R, Honjo H & Owen JM (1997). Regional differences in the role of the Ca2+ and Na+ currents in pacemaker activity in the sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol 272, H2793H2806.[Medline]
Lei M & Brown HF (1996). Two components of the delayed rectifier potassium current, IK, in rabbit sino-atrial node cells. Exp Physiol 81, 725741.[Abstract]
Lei M, Cooper P, Camelliti P & Kohl P (2002a). Contribution of the fast sodium inward current, iNa, to murine sino-atrial node pacemaking. Biophys J 82, 605a.
Lei M, Cooper P, Camelliti P & Kohl P (2002b). Role of the 293b-sensitive, slowly activating delayed rectifier potassium current, i(Ks), in pacemaker activity of rabbit isolated sino-atrial node cells. Cardiovas Res 53, 6879.10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00459-X
Lei M, Honjo H, Kodama I & Boyett MR (2001). Heterogeneous expression of expression of the delayed rectifier K+ currents iK,r and iK,s in rabbit sinoatrial node cells. J Physiol 535, 703714.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.t01-1-00703.x
Maier SK, Westenbroek RE, Chen C, Marble DR, Feigl EO, Isom LL, Catterall WA & Scheuer T (2002a). The ß2-subunit of voltage-gated sodium channels is required for maintenance of regular sinus rhythm in the heart. Biophys J 82, 609a.
Maier SK, Westenbroek RE, Schenkman KA, Feigl EO, Scheuer T & Catterall WA (2002b). An unexpected role for brain-type sodium channels in coupling of cell surface depolarization to contraction in the heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 40734078.1073/pnas.261705699
Maier SK, Westenbroek RE, Yamanushi TT, Dobrzynski H, Boyett MR, Catterall WA & Scheuer T (2003). An unexpected requirement for brain-type sodium channels for control of heart rate in the mouse sinoatrial node. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 35073512.1073/pnas.2627986100
Malhotra JD, Chen C, Rivolta I, Abriel H, Malhotra R, Mattei LN, Brosius FC, Kass RS & Isom LL (2001). Characterization of sodium channel
- and ß-subunits in rat and mouse cardiac myocytes. Circulation 103, 13031310.
Mantegazza M, Yu FH, Catterall WA & Scheuer T (2001). Role of the C-terminal domain in inactivation of brain and cardiac sodium channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 1534815353.1073/pnas.211563298
Musa H, Dobrzynski H, Berry Z, Abidi F, Cass CE, Young JD, Baldwin SA & Boyett MR (2002). Immunocytochemical demonstration of the equilibrative nucleoside transporter rENT1 in rat sinoatrial node. J Histochem Cytochem 50, 305309.
Nathan RD (1986). Two electrophysiologically distinct types of cultured pacemaker cells from rabbit sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol 250, H325H329.[Medline]
Planells-Cases R, Caprini M, Zhang J, Rockenstein EM, Rivera RR, Murre C, Masliah E & Montal M (2000). Neuronal death and perinatal lethality in voltage-gated sodium channel alpha II-deficient mice. Biophys J 78, 28782891.
Smith RD & Goldin AL (1998). Functional analysis of the rat I sodium channel in Xenopus oocytes. J Neurosci 18, 811820.
Yamamoto M, Honjo H, Niwa R & Kodama I (1998). Low-frequency extracellular potentials recorded from the sinoatrial node. Cardiovasc Res 39, 360372.1016/S0008-6363(98)00091-1
Yu FH & Catterall WA (2003). Overview of the voltage-gated sodium channel family. Genome Biol 4, 207.1186/gb-2003-4-3-207[CrossRef][Medline]
Zimmer T, Biskup C, Dugarmaa S, Vogel F, Steinbis M, Bohle T, Wu YS, Dumaine R & Benndorf K (2002a). Functional expression of GFP-linked human heart sodium channel (hH1) and subcellular localization of the a subunit in HEK293 cells and dog cardiac myocytes. J Membr Biol 186, 112.1007/s00232-001-0130-1[CrossRef][Medline]
Zimmer T, Bollensdorff C, Haufe V, Birch Hirschfeld E & Benndorf K (2002b). Mouse heart Na+ channels: primary structure and function of two isoforms and alternatively spliced variants. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282, H1007H1017.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Kurata, H. Matsuda, I. Hisatome, and T. Shibamoto Regional Difference in Dynamical Property of Sinoatrial Node Pacemaking: Role of Na+ Channel Current Biophys. J., July 15, 2008; 95(2): 951 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Mangoni and J. Nargeot Genesis and Regulation of the Heart Automaticity Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 919 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fukuzaki, T. Sato, T. Miki, S. Seino, and H. Nakaya Role of sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive K+ channels in the regulation of sinoatrial node automaticity: an evaluation using Kir6.2-deficient mice J. Physiol., June 1, 2008; 586(11): 2767 - 2778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Dominguez, A. de la Rosa, F. Navarro, D. Franco, and A. E. Aranega Tissue distribution and subcellular localization of the cardiac sodium channel during mouse heart development Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2008; 78(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Baruscotti and R. B. Robinson Electrophysiology and pacemaker function of the developing sinoatrial node Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2613 - H2623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O. Verkerk, A. C.G. van Ginneken, T. A. |