| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rapid Report |
1 Medical Biotechnology Center, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
80 ms. We conclude that restitution of Ca2+ sparks depends on local refilling of SR stores after depletion and may also depend on another time-dependent process such as recovery from inactivation or a slow conformational change after rebinding of Ca2+ to SR regulatory proteins.
(Received 10 March 2005;
accepted after revision 6 April 2005;
first published online 7 April 2005)
Corresponding author W. J. Lederer: Medical Biotechnology Center, 725 W. Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Email: lederer{at}umbi.umd.edu
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
10 000) Ca2+ sparks upon membrane depolarization results in an increase in average [Ca2+]i from 100 nM to 1 µM. These Ca2+ ions then bind to myofilaments to initiate contraction. Ca2+ entry through L-type Ca2+ channels in the cell membrane has been established as the primary trigger of Ca2+ sparks (Cannell et al. 1995; Collier et al. 1999; Lopez-Lopez et al. 1995). However, much remains unknown about how these events terminate and how release recovers after termination. Each Ca2+ spark is locally a positive feedback event in that Ca2+ passing through an open RyR can activate that channel and the other channels in the cluster. In theory, then, Ca2+ sparks could continue indefinitely; however, they last roughly 30 ms under normal conditions. This brevity emphasizes the strength of the mechanism that overcomes the intrinsic positive feedback of CICR to terminate Ca2+ sparks.
The mechanism that underlies Ca2+ spark termination can be probed by examining the time course of recovery after the spark ends, a process called restitution. If probabilistic closing (i.e. ‘stochastic attrition’, see Stern, 1992) of RyRs were solely responsible, restitution would have no time dependence. If, however, sparks terminate due to a shift in RyR gating properties (e.g. RyR inactivation), then an interval would have to elapse before sparks could again be triggered. Stated alternatively, at the moment of termination the cluster of RyRs would be refractory to the Ca2+ stimulus that had been keeping the channels open. However, little is known about the factors that control Ca2+ spark restitution. A limited number of studies have demonstrated refractoriness of Ca2+ release at the subcellular level (Sham et al. 1998; Tanaka et al. 1998), but progress has been hampered by the technical difficulty of triggering consecutive Ca2+ sparks from the same cluster of RyRs.
The experimental strategy we use to study restitution of Ca2+ sparks in rat ventricular myocytes is illustrated in Fig. 1. At diastolic levels of [Ca2+]i, stochastic openings of RyRs are infrequent, and spontaneous sparks are relatively rare. Thus, over a time scale of hundreds of milliseconds, the probability of observing two consecutive Ca2+ sparks from a single site is infinitesimally small. However, low concentrations of the RyR agonist ryanodine can induce more frequent openings of the channel (Buck et al. 1992; Bidasee et al. 2003), as in Fig. 1B. Moreover, the extremely high affinity of RyRs for ryanodine (Zucchi & Ronca-Testoni, 1997; Fill & Copello, 2002) ensures that a ryanodine molecule bound to a single subunit of an RyR homotetramer can influence the channel's gating for a long period of time (seconds). We have taken advantage of these features of RyR gating by perfusing cells with a very low concentration of ryanodine (50–100 nM). As shown below, under these conditions only 0–10 ryanodine molecules bind tightly to individual RyR monomers within a cell, and these channels serve as periodic Ca2+ sources to repetitively trigger Ca2+ sparks. By analysing Ca2+ sparks that occur consecutively at the same spark site, we have obtained new information about how the amplitude and the triggering of Ca2+ sparks recover with time.
|
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Adult rats were killed by lethal injection of pentobarbital (100 mg kg–1), and ventricular myocytes were prepared by standard enzymatic dissociation methods (Cannell et al. 1994). Rats were maintained and experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Maryland. Experiments were performed at room temperature (22°C).
Confocal recording and solutions
Isolated cells were superfused with Tyrode solution containing (mM): NaCl 140, KCl 5, Hepes 5, NaH2PO4 1, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 1.8, glucose 10 (pH 7.4). To allow for confocal imaging of [Ca2+]i, cells were loaded for 30 min with 5 µM fluo-3 AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA), then washed and stored for 20 min in Tyrode solution to enable dye de-esterification. Confocal imaging in line-scan mode was performed on a Zeiss 510 microscope. Cells were scanned with light at 488 nm from an argon-ion laser, and fluorescence above 505 nm was recorded. To generate repeated Ca2+ sparks at a limited number of locations, 50 nM ryanodine (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) was added to the external solution.
Analysis of Ca2+ spark pairs
Each spark pair was analysed as follows (see Fig. 1C). Line scan images were converted to units of F/F0 on a pixel-by-pixel basis, then Ca2+ spark time courses were derived by averaging over ±0.5 µm from the centre of the spark. Spark-to-spark delay was computed as the duration from the first to the second spark upstroke (maximum dF/dt). The first spark amplitude was calculated relative to the baseline value of 1 F0 whereas the amplitude of the second spark in each pair was defined as the difference between the peak of the spark and the fluorescence level immediately before the upstroke. This measure was used because sparks occurring at very short delays occasionally appeared on a baseline of elevated fluorescence (see, e.g. Fig. 2A).
|
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
10–6. In addition, the extremely slow rate of ryanodine unbinding from the high-affinity binding site on the RyR (McGrew et al. 1989) means that a bound ryanodine molecule is likely to remain attached for several seconds. Thus, in the example shown, we are confident that the repetitive Ca2+ sparks shown after application of 50 nM ryanodine originated from the same RyR cluster. Moreover, because a very low concentration of ryanodine was added to the outside of the cells, we think it is likely that the repetitive Ca2+ spark site shown results from a single ryanodine molecule binding to an individual RyR monomer within the cluster. In some cells, we observed a dramatic increase in Ca2+ spark activity upon ryanodine application such that it was difficult to determine whether repetitive sparks originated from one or several different clusters. Results from these cells have been excluded from the data presented below. Example Ca2+ spark pairs, with different delays between the two, are displayed in Fig. 2A. These results indicate that the relative amplitude of the second spark tends to be small when the spark-to-spark delay is short and larger as this delay increases. A scatterplot of all spark pairs analysed (Fig. 2B) confirms the impression given by the examples and shows that spark amplitude recovery can be fitted with a single exponential with a time constant of 91 ms.
The relationship between RyR ‘trigger events’ (i.e. openings of the ryanodine-bound channel) and the delay following a previous trigger should theoretically be described by a decaying exponential, similar to the re-opening of any non-inactivating channel. If the probability that a given opening will trigger a spark remains constant with time, the shape of the second spark delay histogram should be identical, i.e. also a decreasing exponential. In contrast, if restitution involves a time-dependent recovery from refractoriness, the histogram of spark delays should have a biphasic shape.
Figure 3A shows that the histogram of spark-to-spark delays is indeed biphasic. In these experiments, sparks were quite unlikely to occur at short delays (zero sparks from 0 to 60 ms) and most likely to occur with a delay of around 240 ms. The two largest bins in the histogram are those which represent 180–240 ms and 240–300 ms. Thus, triggering of Ca2+ sparks displays refractoriness to activation that recovers with time. The decaying phase of the histogram in Fig. 3A (delays > 240 ms) can be well fitted with a single exponential (red time; time constant 189 ms), suggesting that spark triggering probability is constant over this range of delays. We can derive an estimate of how this triggering probability evolves with time by dividing the values in the histogram by the fit and normalizing. This quantity, ‘Derived PTRIG’, is displayed in Fig. 3B. This increases with time, indicating that the RyR cluster is refractory to activation early after the initial spark event. The time course of Derived PTRIG appears to include an initial delay of 80 ms and then to rise with a time constant of roughly 80 ms.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Under our experimental conditions, the primary effect of 50 nM ryanodine was to generate repeated Ca2+ sparks at a limited number of RyR clusters within the cell. Usually, zero or one repetitive site could be detected in a line scan that spanned the cell length, and sparks from these sites were morphologically similar to those originating at other sites. Previous reports (Cheng et al. 1993) observed extremely long lasting (hundreds of milliseconds) Ca2+ sparks after application of higher concentrations of ryanodine (100 nM), consistent with the long-lasting subconductance states seen in planar lipid bilayer studies of RyR gating. However, these bilayer experiments have also demonstrated that very low ryanodine doses can cause an increase in RyR open probability with no change in conductance and only a small increase in mean open time (Bull et al. 1989; Buck et al. 1992; Bidasee et al. 2003). These observations led to the hypothesis that the latter effect results from the binding of a single ryanodine molecule to the channel whereas long-lasting subconductance states only occur when two molecules are bound. We occasionally observed long-lasting Ca2+ sparks in our experiments; however, by adding a very low dose of ryanodine externally and by acquiring all of our recordings within the first 10 min, we minimized the opportunities for RyRs gating in the ‘long opening’ mode to confound the interpretation of the results. In that we added an agent to increase Ca2+ spark probability, our strategy is similar to that previously employed by Terentyev et al. (2002), who collected delays between repeated sparks after adding imperatoxin A to permeabilized cells. However, we have significantly extended the analysis performed by these authors by examining restitution of Ca2+ spark amplitude and deriving an estimate of the recovery of Ca2+ spark triggering probability.
This study represents the most complete examination of the local recovery of Ca2+ release in heart cells, an important issue that, primarily due to technical difficulties, has only been addressed in a handful of previous reports. Cheng et al. (1996) recorded confocal line scan images of Ca2+ transients evoked by field stimulation and documented restitution of stimulus-induced Ca2+ release when stimuli were given soon after regenerative Ca2+ waves. Their derived recovery function is slower than Ca2+ spark amplitude recovery measured here, a consistent result since that measurement reflected a composite of amplitude recovery, triggering probability recovery, and possibly also recovery of the L-type Ca2+ current trigger. In another study, Tanaka et al. (1998) observed a tendency for evoked Ca2+ transients to not contain sparks at locations where a spontaneous Ca2+ spark had recently (< 25 ms) occurred. When Ca2+ sparks did occur at these locations, little change in the Ca2+ transient amplitude was seen. Two factors can explain the apparent discrepancy with our results. One is that the majority of their experiments were performed in the presence of isoproterenol, an agent that will speed SR refilling and may lead to faster recovery of Ca2+ release, as was recently observed at the whole cell level (Szentesi et al. 2004). A second important point is that the Ca2+ transient amplitude measured at any given location will include contributions from sparks originating outside the plane of focus and will therefore be a relatively insensitive measure of the true amount of local SR Ca2+ release.
DelPrincipe et al. (1999) used two-photon laser pulse trains to trigger local Ca2+ release by ‘uncaging’ Ca2+ bound to the light-sensitive Ca2+ buffer DM-nitrophen and found no refractoriness in the ability of these pulse trains to trigger Ca2+ sparks. However, since two-photon triggers were delivered with an interpulse delay of at least 200 ms, this result is not necessarily inconsistent with the kinetics observed here. A fourth approach was employed by Sham et al. (1998), who documented local refractoriness of Ca2+ release by noting a negative correlation between the local quantities of Ca2+ released upon depolarization and those triggered by tail currents upon repolarization. These authors also observed slow recovery of whole-cell Ca2+ release when a two-pulse protocol was applied (half time of 500 ms). While this Ca2+ release recovery is considerably slower than we have observed here, this result is not necessarily inconsistent with our findings. Sham et al. (1998) performed experiments with a high concentration of exogenous buffer (4 mM EGTA) added to the patch pipette so that Ca2+ spikes (Song et al. 1998) could be recorded, and this excess buffer would have acted to slow SR refilling. Therefore, if refilling of local SR stores plays a key role in the recovery of release from refractoriness, as we hypothesize, the slow recovery observed is to be expected. Our results complement these prior efforts and provide new information of the time course of Ca2+ release restitution. In particular, this study has generated simultaneous estimates of how both Ca2+ spark amplitude and spark triggering probability recover with time.
Two primary factors can presumably contribute to the recovery of Ca2+ spark amplitude with time: (1) greater local SR content due to refilling after depletion, and (2) increased availability of RyRs due to recovery from a process such as inactivation. We hypothesize that refilling plays a much greater role in the recovery of spark amplitude, due to the extremely small SR volumes that appear to provide the Ca2+ ions released during sparks. Ultrastructural studies suggest that a junctional SR (JSR) ‘release unit’ is a disk approximately 400 nm in diameter and perhaps 15 nm thick (Inui et al. 1988). If such a volume (2 al) contained 1 mM free Ca2+ and 15 mM of Ca2+-bound buffer (primarily calsequestrin), it would hold only 18 000 Ca2+ ions. Since a 1 pA current is equivalent to roughly 3000 Ca2+ ions per millisecond, depletion of local JSR should occur quickly during a Ca2+ spark, and this depletion would result in a decreasing Ca2+ efflux function. This idea was explored through computer modelling, as illustrated in Fig. 4. Two separate models were used to simulate SR Ca2+ release currents and the resulting Ca2+ sparks (see figure legend for model details). Figure 4A, which plots the simulated Ca2+ efflux from the SR during an assumed 20 ms period of release, shows that depletion occurs much more quickly when 20 (red line, top) RyRs are open than when only 4 RyRs (black line, bottom) are open. As a result, the integrated release, plotted in the inset in units of femtocoulombs, is only 39.5% greater (20.9 versus 14.9 fC) when 20 RyRs release Ca2+. As a consequence, the Ca2+ spark resulting from 20 open RyRs is only 38.7% larger than the 4 RyR spark (Fig. 4B). Figure 4C displays this less-than-proportional increase in amplitude with an increase in the number of open RyRs. Additional simulations (not shown) confirmed that this non-linear relationship was primarily due to faster depletion rather than saturation of the fluo-3 indicator. The net result of this non-linearity is that if SR refilling were instantaneous and Ca2+ spark amplitude recovery resulted solely from recovery of RyRs from inactivation, spark amplitude would recover far faster than channel availability, as shown in Fig. 4D. For Ca2+ spark amplitude to recover with a half-time of 63 ms, as measured, channel availability would have to recover with a time constant of 758 ms, a rate that is unrealistically slow.
|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Buck E, Zimanyi I, Abramson JJ & Pessah IN (1992). Ryanodine stabilizes multiple conformational states of the skeletal muscle calcium release channel. J Biol Chem 267, 23560–23567.
Bull R, Marengo JJ, Suarez-Isla BA, Donoso P, Sutko JL & Hidalgo C (1989). Activation of calcium channels in sarcoplasmic reticulum from frog muscle by nanomolar concentrations of ryanodine. Biophys J 56, 749–756.
Cannell MB, Cheng H & Lederer WJ (1994). Spatial non-uniformities in [Ca2+]i during excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac myocytes. Biophys J 67, 1942–1956.
Cannell MB, Cheng H & Lederer WJ (1995). The control of calcium release in heart muscle. Science 268, 1045–1049.
Cheng H, Lederer WJ & Cannell MB (1993). Calcium sparks: elementary events underlying excitation-contraction coupling in heart muscle. Science 262, 740–744.
Cheng H, Lederer MR, Lederer WJ & Cannell MB (1996). Calcium sparks and [Ca2+]i waves in cardiac myocytes. Am J Physiol 270, C148–C159.[Medline]
Ching LL, Williams AJ & Sitsapesan R (2000). Evidence for Ca2+ activation and inactivation sites on the luminal side of the cardiac ryanodine receptor complex. Circ Res 87, 201–206.
Collier ML, Thomas AP & Berlin JR (1999). Relationship between L-type Ca2+ current and unitary sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release events in rat ventricular myocytes. J Physiol 516, 117–128.
DelPrincipe F, Egger M & Niggli E (1999). Calcium signalling in cardiac muscle: refractoriness revealed by coherent activation. Nat Cell Biol 1, 323–329.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fill M & Copello JA (2002). Ryanodine receptor calcium release channels. Physiol Rev 82, 893–922.
Guatimosim S, Dilly K, Santana LF, Jafri MS, Sobie EA & Lederer WJ (2002). Local Ca2+ signaling and EC coupling in heart: Ca2+ sparks and the regulation of the [Ca2+]i transient. J Mol Cell Cardiol 34, 941–950.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gyorke I & Gyorke S (1998). Regulation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor channel by luminal Ca2+ involves luminal Ca2+ sensing sites. Biophys J 75, 2801–2810.
Inui M, Wang S, Saito A & Fleischer S (1988). Characterization of junctional and longitudinal sarcoplasmic reticulum from heart muscle. J Biol Chem 263, 10843–10850.
Kettlun C, Gonzalez A, Rios E & Fill M (2003). Unitary Ca2+ current through mammalian cardiac and amphibian skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor channels under near-physiological ionic conditions. J General Physiol 122, 407–417.
Lopez-Lopez JR, Shacklock PS, Balke CW & Wier WG (1995). Local calcium transients triggered by single L-type calcium channel currents in cardiac cells. Science 268, 1042–1045.
McGrew SG, Wolleben C, Siegl P, Inui M & Fleischer S (1989). Positive cooperativity of ryanodine binding to the calcium release channel of sarcoplasmic reticulum from heart and skeletal muscle. Biochem 28, 1686–1691.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sham JS, Song LS, Chen Y, Deng LH, Stern MD, Lakatta EG & Cheng H (1998). Termination of Ca2+ release by a local inactivation of ryanodine receptors in cardiac myocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 15096–15101.
Sobie EA, Dilly KW, Dos Santos CJ, Lederer WJ & Jafri MS (2002). Termination of cardiac Ca2+ sparks: an investigative mathematical model of calcium-induced calcium release. Biophys J 83, 59–78.
Song LS, Sham JS, Stern MD, Lakatta EG & Cheng H (1998). Direct measurement of SR release flux by tracking ‘Ca2+ spikes’ in rat cardiac myocytes. J Physiol 512, 677–691.
Stern MD (1992). Theory of excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac muscle. Biophys J 63, 497–517.
Szentesi P, Pignier C, Egger M, Kranias EG & Niggli E (2004). Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ refilling controls recovery from Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release refractoriness in heart muscle. Circ Res 95, 807–813.
Tanaka H, Sekine T, Kawanishi T, Nakamura R & Shigenobu K (1998). Intrasarcomere [Ca2+] gradients and their spatio-temporal relation to Ca2+ sparks in rat cardiomyocytes. J Physiol 508, 145–152.
Terentyev D, Viatchenko-Karpinski S, Gyorke I, Volpe P, Williams SC & Gyorke S (2003). Calsequestrin determines the functional size and stability of cardiac intracellular calcium stores: Mechanism for hereditary arrhythmia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 11759–11764.
Terentyev D, Viatchenko-Karpinski S, Valdivia HH, Escobar AL & Gyorke S (2002). Luminal Ca2+ controls termination and refractory behavior of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res 91, 414–420.
Wier WG & Balke CW (1999). Ca2+ release mechanisms, Ca2+ sparks, and local control of excitation-contraction coupling in normal heart muscle. Circ Res 85, 770–776.
Zucchi R & Ronca-Testoni S (1997). The sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ channel/ryanodine receptor: Modulation by endogenous effectors, drugs and disease states. Pharmacol Rev 49, 1–51.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. G. Restrepo, J. N. Weiss, and A. Karma Calsequestrin-Mediated Mechanism for Cellular Calcium Transient Alternans Biophys. J., October 15, 2008; 95(8): 3767 - 3789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Cheng and W. J. Lederer Calcium Sparks Physiol Rev, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1491 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. S. B. Williams, M. A. Huertas, E. A. Sobie, M. S. Jafri, and G. D. Smith Moment Closure for Local Control Models of Calcium-Induced Calcium Release in Cardiac Myocytes Biophys. J., August 15, 2008; 95(4): 1689 - 1703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Rios, J. Zhou, G. Brum, B. S. Launikonis, and M. D. Stern Calcium-dependent Inactivation Terminates Calcium Release in Skeletal Muscle of Amphibians J. Gen. Physiol., March 31, 2008; 131(4): 335 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Gyorke and D. Terentyev Modulation of ryanodine receptor by luminal calcium and accessory proteins in health and cardiac disease Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2008; 77(2): 245 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. M. Dibb, D. A. Eisner, and A. W. Trafford Regulation of systolic [Ca2+]i and cellular Ca2+ flux balance in rat ventricular myocytes by SR Ca2+, L-type Ca2+ current and diastolic [Ca2+]i J. Physiol., December 1, 2007; 585(2): 579 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. G. Wier Gain and Cardiac E-C Coupling: Revisited and Revised Circ. Res., September 14, 2007; 101(6): 533 - 535. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Picht, J. DeSantiago, L. A. Blatter, and D. M. Bers Cardiac Alternans Do Not Rely on Diastolic Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Content Fluctuations Circ. Res., September 29, 2006; 99(7): 740 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
= 91 ms).
