J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 568, Number 3, 967-978, November 1, 2005 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.094854
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
568/3/967    most recent
jphysiol.2005.094854v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. J
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. J
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. M

Measurement of nitric oxide release evoked by systemic hypoxia and adenosine from rat skeletal muscle in vivo

Clare J Ray1 and Janice M Marshall1

1 Department of Physiology, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is accepted that NO plays a role in hypoxic vasodilatation in several tissues. For rat hindlimb muscle there is evidence that during systemic hypoxia endogenously released adenosine acts on endothelial A1 receptors to evoke dilatation in a NO-dependent fashion, implying requirement for, or mediation by, NO. We tested in vivo whether systemic hypoxia and adenosine release NO from muscle. In anaesthetized rats, arterial blood pressure (ABP) and femoral blood flow (FBF) were recorded allowing computation of femoral vascular conductance (FVC). Blood samples taken from femoral artery and vein allowed electrochemical measurement of plasma [NO] after reduction of NO3 and NO2. Systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion for 5 min each, evoked an increase in FVC that was attenuated by the NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NAME (Group 1, n = 8) and adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, Group 2, n = 6). Concomitant systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion evoked increases in venous–arterial [NO] difference ([NO]v-a) from –1.4 ± 0.85 to 6.6 ± 1.6 and 2.3 ± 0.78 to 8.4 ± 1.8 nmol l–1, respectively (mean ± S.E.M), which were abolished by L-NAME (–0.72 ± 0.90 to –0.87 ± 0.74 and 0.72 ± 0.85 to –0.97 ± 1.1 nmol l–1, respectively). DPCPX also abolished the hypoxia-evoked increase in [NO]v-a (control –4.2 ± 1.8 to 12.5 ± 3.7 nmol l–1, with DPCPX –0.63 ± 2.6 to 3.3 ± 2.9 nmol l–1) and decreased the adenosine-evoked increase in [NO]v-a (control 1.1 ± 1.5 to 24 ± 14, with DPCPX –0.43 ± 2.9 to 12 ± 5.9 nmol l–1). These results allow the novel conclusion that the muscle vasodilatation of systemic hypoxia is partly mediated by adenosine acting at endothelial A1 receptors to stimulate synthesis and release of NO, which then induces dilatation.

(Received 18 July 2005; accepted after revision 22 August 2005; first published online 25 August 2005)
Corresponding author C. J. Ray: Department of Physiology, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Email: c.j.ray{at}bham.ac.uk


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is becoming accepted that NO contributes to hypoxia-induced dilatation. The evidence is largely indirect and comes from in vivo studies involving NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors (Iwamoto et al. 1992) and in vitro studies on perfused organs and blood vessels in which NO was assessed by bioassay, accumulation of cGMP (the second messenger for NO), chemiluminescence or with a NO-sensitive electrode (Pohl & Busse, 1989; Shaul et al. 1992; Sun & Reis, 1992; Frisbee et al. 2002). In particular, the vasodilatation evoked in hindlimb muscles of the rat by systemic hypoxia assessed as an increase in femoral vascular conductance (FVC), was virtually abolished by the NOS inhibitor L-NAME. It was also decreased by a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), but not by a selective A2A receptor antagonist (Skinner & Marshall, 1996; Bryan & Marshall, 1999a). Further, muscle vasodilatation evoked by infusion of a selective A1 receptor agonist was attenuated by L-NAME (Bryan & Marshall, 1999b). These results led to the conclusion that the hindlimb muscle vasodilatation of systemic hypoxia is partly mediated by adenosine acting on A1 receptors in an NO-dependent manner (Bryan & Marshall, 1999b). Thus, it might be inferred that adenosine released during systemic hypoxia acts on endothelial cells via A1 receptors to cause dilatation by increasing the synthesis of NO.

However, after addition of L-NAME, which blocks tonic synthesis of NO and so reduces baseline FVC, the increase in FVC evoked by systemic hypoxia was restored when baseline FVC was restored by infusion of an NO donor. This ‘restored’ hypoxia-induced dilatation was also attenuated by DPCPX (Edmunds & Marshall, 2001a; Edmunds et al. 2003). Thus, even in the absence of NO synthesis, hypoxia still evokes adenosine-mediated muscle dilatation providing that a background level of NO is present. Exogenous adenosine was also able to evoke an increase in FVC after NOS inhibition, when baseline FVC was restored by infusion of an NO donor, or by cell permeant cGMP. By contrast, the hypoxia-induced increase in FVC was not restored by cGMP (Edmunds et al. 2003). Indeed, further experiments led to the proposal that a background level of cGMP is needed for the action of adenosine, but a background level of NO is required for the hypoxia-induced release of adenosine (Edmunds et al. 2003).

Direct observations on muscle microcirculation extended these ideas. Proximal and terminal arterioles dilated in response to systemic hypoxia and L-NAME attenuated these dilator responses. However, restoration of a tonic level of NO by infusion of an NO donor restored the dilatation of proximal, but not terminal arterioles; the ‘restored’ response of primary arterioles was attenuated by DPCPX (Edmunds & Marshall, 2003). Given that changes in gross vascular conductance in skeletal muscle can be attributed to behaviour of proximal arterioles, the major resistance vessels (Hebert & Marshall, 1988; Mian & Marshall, 1991a), these results raised the possibility that under normal conditions when NO synthesis is possible, hypoxia-induced dilatation of proximal arterioles is not actually mediated by NO, but is simply dependent on a background level of NO for adenosine to be released and to act on the vascular smooth muscle. Alternatively, when NO synthesis is possible, hypoxia-induced dilatation of proximal arterioles is mediated by NO generated in response to adenosine, and when it is not possible, this dilatation is partly mediated by other mechanisms, providing that NO is present. The characteristics of the hypoxia-induced dilatation of terminal arterioles could be explained if endogenous adenosine can only dilate them by increasing the synthesis and release of NO (Edmunds & Marshall, 2001b, 2003).

In view of these findings, the present study was performed to test more directly whether systemic hypoxia does evoke significant release of NO from skeletal muscle vasculature by stimulating NOS, and whether this is achieved partly by locally released adenosine acting on A1 receptors. To this end, NO released into plasma of hindlimb muscle was assayed by using a NO-sensitive electrode to measure NO generated from plasma nitrite and nitrate (NOx) during acute hypoxia, before and after NOS inhibition with L-NAME or A1 receptor blockade with DPCPX. Complementary experiments were performed for changes evoked by infusion of adenosine.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All experiments were performed in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. In 22 male Wistar rats, anaesthesia was induced with Sagatal (pentobarbitone sodium 60 mg ml–1; 60 mg kg–1 I.P., Rhône Mérieux, UK) and maintained with Saffan (7–12 mg kg–1 h–1 I.V., Plough Animal Health, UK) using techniques previously described (Bryan & Marshall, 1999a). Briefly, the animals spontaneously breathed 21% O2 in N2 delivered by a gas rotameter system, except when the gas delivered was changed to a hypoxic mixture of 8% O2 in N2 for 5 min, to test the response to systemic hypoxia (see below). Arterial blood pressure (ABP) was recorded via a cannula placed in the left brachial artery. Branches of the left iliac and femoral artery and vein not supplying skeletal muscle were ligated and a perivascular flow probe (0.7 V; Transonic Systems Inc., NY, USA), connected to a flow meter (T106, small animal flow meter; Transonic Systems Inc.), was placed around the left femoral artery in order to allow continuous recording of femoral blood flow (FBF). The right femoral artery and vein were cannulated such that the tips of the cannulae lay in the bifurcation of the dorsal aorta and the inferior vena cava, respectively (their positions were confirmed post mortem). Blood samples (150 µl) were removed anaerobically via the femoral arterial cannula for analysis of arterial PO2, PCO2 and pH (PaO2,PaCO2 and pHa, respectively) by using a blood gas analyser (Instrumentation Laboratory, MA, USA). The venous cannula allowed the administration of pharmacological antagonists (see below). The ventral tail artery was also cannulated retrogradely such that the tip of the cannula lay in the bifurcation of the dorsal aorta allowing the preferential infusion of adenosine into the hindlimb.

The femoral arterial and venous cannulae also allowed the removal of blood samples (100 µl) for analysis of arterial and venous plasma NOx as [NO]a and [NO]v, respectively (see below). Whole blood was taken into a microtube containing 5 µl heparinized saline (25 U ml–1). After rapid mixing, the microtubes were placed directly into a microcentrifuge and spun at 10 000 g for 5 min. Then 50 µl plasma was removed from each tube and rapidly frozen in liquid N2 before being stored at –80°C for the later determination of [NOx]. Next 50 µl of the plasma substitute hetastarch (Sigma, UK) was added to the remaining plasma and red blood cells in the tube and was re-infused into the animal.

A MacLab/8s (AD Instruments Ltd, Hastings, West Sussex, UK) data acquisition system sampling at 100 Hz was used to collect all cardiovascular variables onto a Power Mac G4 computer. FVC was derived on-line by dividing FBF by ABP. Following surgery, and before the experimental protocol began, an equilibration period of at least 45 min was allowed for the stabilization of all cardiovascular variables.

Experimental protocols

Group 1.  In eight rats (body weight, 356 ± 21.2 g), the cardiovascular changes evoked by a 5-min period of systemic hypoxia (breathing 8% O2) and a 5-min infusion of adenosine (1.2 mg kg–1 min–1 I.A.), were recorded in random order before and 30 min after the administration of L-NAME (10 mg kg–1 I.V.). This dose and infusion rate of adenosine was chosen to evoke an increase in FVC similar to that induced by hypoxia (Bryan & Marshall, 1999a,b). A period of at least 10 min was allowed to elapse between stimuli so that cardiovascular variables could stabilize. During air breathing and in the fifth minute of hypoxia, arterial blood samples were taken for analysis of blood gases. In addition, in the minute before, and in the fifth minute of hypoxia or adenosine infusion, arterial and venous blood samples (see above) were taken for the later determination of plasma [NO] (see below).

Group 2.  In a further group of six rats (body weight, 255 ± 13.0 g), a protocol similar to that described for Group 1 was performed, except that L-NAME was replaced by DPCPX (0.1 mg kg–1 I.V.). DPCPX is highly selective for A1 adenosine receptors (Daly et al. 1985), being 700-fold more selective for A1 compared with A2A receptors in binding studies (Coates et al. 1994). This dose of DPCPX reversed the increase in FVC evoked by a selective A1 receptor agonist (see Bryan & Marshall, 1999a and references therein).

Group 3.  In a final group of eight rats (body weight, 245 ± 12.1 g), the protocol used in Groups 1 and 2 was repeated, with the vehicle for L-NAME and DPCPX (0.1 ml saline) instead of the administration of the drugs. This group of experiments served as a vehicle and time control.

Assay of NOX levels in arterial and venous plasma

The assay of NO generated from NOx in the arterial and venous plasma samples collected during Group 1, 2 and 3 protocols was a two-stage process which firstly involved the conversion of nitrate (NO3) in the plasma to nitrite (NO2), and secondly involved the electrochemical measurement of [NO] by use of an NO-sensitive electrode, following the reduction of NO2 by a 0.1 mol l–1 H2SO4/KI solution.

The conversion of NO3 to NO2 was performed using the Nitralyser II nitrate to nitrite reduction kit (WPI, FL, USA) and the protocol provided with the kit. Each 100-µl sample of supernatant produced by this protocol was then added to 10 ml 0.1 mol l–1 H2SO4/KI and the NO generated from NO2 was measured using an NO-sensitive electrode with a 2-mm diameter tip (ISO-NOP sensor, WPI) connected to an NO meter (ISO-NO Mark II, WPI). We have previously described the use of this electrode to measure NO released from the endothelial cells of freshly excised arterial vessels (Ray et al. 2002). Briefly, NO is produced according to the following equation:


{tjp_1184_m1}

NO diffuses through the selective membrane at the tip of the NO sensor where it oxidizes on the working electrode creating a redox current directly proportional to the concentration of NO released. By calibrating the electrode using known concentrations of a nitrite standard (Ray et al. 2002), the NO released from each sample was calculated ([NO]a and [NO]v). A period of 2 min was allowed between the addition of successive samples for the NO meter output to return to a steady level. The peak change in the output of the NO electrode evoked by each sample was measured and converted into a concentration of NO after the NO electrode had been calibrated.

NOx assay controls

The NO that could be released from NO2 present in arterial and venous blood samples in the absence of chemical conversion of NO3 to NO2 as described above, was assessed by adding 12 µl plasma (the volume of plasma used in the NO3 to NO2 conversion) to 0.1 mol l–1 H2SO4/KI solution. Any change in NO output was recorded using the NO-sensitive electrode. This was carried out for each arterial and venous plasma sample collected in the protocols described above.

To assess the effectiveness of the NO3 to NO2 conversion, controls were carried out at the same time as the experimental plasma samples for each individual animal, by using NO3 standards. These assays were performed according to the protocol described above, but the plasma samples were replaced by NO3 standards at concentrations of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 nmol l–1.

Statistical analyses

All data are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Effects of hypoxia and adenosine infusion on cardiovascular variables (ABP, FBF and FVC), blood gas data and [NO]a, [NO]v and [NO]v-a before and after infusion of L-NAME, DPCPX or vehicle were analysed using ANOVA for repeated measures. In addition, because L-NAME caused a decrease in baseline FVC (see below), the muscle vasodilator responses were also analysed as the integral of the FVC over the 5-min period of hypoxia or adenosine infusion relative to the integral of FVC during the preceding 5 min. These comparisons were made before and after infusion of L-NAME, DPCPX and vehicle by using ANOVA. The conclusions that can be drawn from the analyses of FVC were the same whether the absolute values or the integrals of the changes were used: the text below and the figures show the outcome of the analyses on the absolute values. Between-group comparisons of baselines and control responses to hypoxia and adenosine infusion (ABP, FBF, FVC, blood gas data, [NO]a, [NO]v and [NO]v-a) were made by factorial ANOVA. In all cases, the level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Scheffe's post hoc test was used to determine significant differences between measurements taken under different conditions in a given protocol.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Group 1: effects of L-NAME

Cardiovascular responses to systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion.  A 5-min period of systemic hypoxia (breathing 8% O2) resulted in a substantial fall in PaO2 and PaCO2 (Table 1), a fall in ABP and no change in FBF (Table 2), but an increase in FVC, indicating hindlimb vasodilatation (Fig. 1A; Bryan & Marshall, 1999a; Ray et al. 2002). A similar cardiovascular response was induced by adenosine infusion (1.2 mg kg–1 min–1 I.A.; Fig. 1A and Table 2), but there were no blood gas changes (data not shown; Bryan & Marshall, 1999a). L-NAME (10 mg kg–1 I.V.) caused a significant increase in baseline ABP and PaO2, and a significant decrease in baseline FBF and FVC (Tables 1 and 2 and Fig. 1A). However, L-NAME had no effect on baseline levels of PaCO2 and pH, or the fall in PaO2 and PaCO2 and the increase in pHa evoked by hypoxia (Table 1). Nevertheless, L-NAME significantly attenuated the increase in FVC evoked by systemic hypoxia and by adenosine infusion (Fig. 1A).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Blood gas values and arterial pH measured during air-breathing and at the fifth minute of hypoxia before and after administration of L-NAME, DPCPX or vehicle
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Cardiovascular variables measured 1 min before and in the fifth minute of hypoxia or adenosine infusion before and after addition of the NOS inhibitor L-NAME, the A1 adenosine receptor antagonist DPCPX or vehicle
 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.  Effect of L-NAME on FVC and NO release before and in the fifth minute of hypoxia and adenosine infusion
Columns show mean (± S.E.M., n = 8) FVC (A, grey and striped columns), arterial (open columns) and venous (filled columns) plasma [NO] (B) and [NO]v-a (C, chequered columns) before (0) and in the fifth minute (5) of hypoxia and adenosine infusion before and after addition of L-NAME (see arrow). ****, ***, **, * and NS, P < 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05 and no significant difference, respectively, before versus after 5 min of hypoxia or adenosine infusion. {dagger}{dagger}{dagger}{dagger} and {dagger}P < 0.0001 and 0.05, respectively, before or 5 min after hypoxia and adenosine infusion, before versus after addition of L-NAME.

 
Plasma [NO]X during systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion.  Both systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion also evoked a significant increase in [NO]a and [NO]v (Fig. 1B). L-NAME had no effect on baseline [NO]a and [NO]v, but the changes induced by hypoxia and adenosine were abolished (Fig. 1B). It is important to note that [NO]v-a was significantly increased during the fifth minute of both hypoxia and adenosine infusion (Fig. 1C). L-NAME had no effect on baseline [NO]v-a during air breathing, but the changes induced in [NO]v-a by hypoxia and adenosine infusion were abolished (Fig. 1C).

Group 2: effects of DPCPX

Cardiovascular responses to systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion.  The responses evoked by systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion were qualitatively similar to those of Group 1; although in Group 2, the increase in FVC evoked by adenosine was smaller than that evoked by systemic hypoxia (cf. Fig. 2A and Fig. 1A). DPCPX (0.1 mg kg–1 I.V.) had no significant effect on baseline cardiovascular variables (Table 2), or baseline PaCO2 or pHa, but significantly increased baseline PaO2 (Table 1). DPCPX did not affect the fall in PaO2 and PaCO2, nor the increase in pHa evoked by systemic hypoxia (Table 1), but greatly reduced the increase in FVC evoked by both systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion (Fig. 2A).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.  Effect of DPCPX on FVC and NO release before and in the fifth minute of hypoxia and adenosine infusion
Columns show mean (± S.E.M., n = 6) FVC (A, grey and striped columns), arterial (open columns) and venous (filled columns) plasma [NO] (B) and [NO]v-a (C, chequered columns) before (0) and in the fifth minute (5) of hypoxia and adenosine infusion, before and after addition of DPCPX (see arrow). ****, ***, **, * and NS, P < 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05 and no significant difference, respectively, before versus after 5 min of hypoxia or adenosine infusion. {dagger}{dagger}{dagger} and {dagger}P < 0.001 and 0.05, respectively, before (0) and in the fifth minute (5) of hypoxia and adenosine infusion, before versus after addition of DPCPX.

 
Plasma [NO]X during systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion.  As in Group 1, systemic hypoxia evoked a significant increase in [NO]a and [NO]v (Fig. 2B). Adenosine infusion tended to evoke an increase in [NO]a (P = 0.0663), but there was a significant increase in [NO]v (Fig. 2B). DPCPX had no effect on baseline [NO]a or [NO]v, but attenuated the changes in [NO]a and [NO]v evoked by hypoxia and the adenosine-induced increase in [NO]v (Fig. 2B). [NO]v-a was significantly increased during the fifth minute of hypoxia and adenosine infusion as in Group 1 and both responses were attenuated by DPCPX. Any remaining increase in [NO]v-a evoked by adenosine did not reach statistical significance after administration of DPCPX (P = 0.1903; Fig. 2C). Any residual NO release in response to adenosine may have been due to its action at endothelial A2A adenosine receptors, which have previously been shown to mediate NO release (see Discussion and Bryan & Marshall, 1999a; Ray et al. 2002; Sobrevia et al. 1997).

Group 3: vehicle

Cardiovascular responses to systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion.  The responses evoked by systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion were similar to those of Group 1 and 2. The vehicle for the administration of L-NAME and DPCPX had no significant effect on baseline cardiovascular variables (Table 2) or the responses to hypoxia or adenosine infusion. In addition, the changes in blood gases and pHa evoked by hypoxia were unaffected by the administration of the vehicle for L-NAME and DPCPX (Table 1).

Plasma [NO]x during systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion.  As in Group 1 and 2, systemic hypoxia evoked a significant increase in [NO]a and [NO]v (Fig. 3B), and this response was unchanged after administration of vehicle. Adenosine infusion increased [NO]a before administration of vehicle and showed a strong tendency to increase [NO]a after administration of vehicle (P = 0.0564), [NO]v was significantly increased before and after vehicle. Vehicle had no effect on baseline [NO]a and [NO]v (Fig. 3B). As was also the case with Group 1 and 2, [NO]v-a was significantly increased during the fifth minute of hypoxia and adenosine infusion, this response was unchanged by vehicle (Fig. 3C). Vehicle also had no effect on baseline [NO]v-a.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.  Effect of vehicle for L-NAME and DPCPX (0.1 ml saline) on FVC and NO release before and in the fifth minute of hypoxia and adenosine infusion
Columns show mean (± S.E.M., n = 8) FVC (A, grey and striped columns), arterial (open columns) and venous (filled columns) plasma [NO] (B) and [NO]v-a (C, chequered columns) before (0) and in the fifth minute (5) of hypoxia and adenosine infusion before and after 0.1 ml saline, the vehicle for L-NAME and DPCPX (see arrow). ****, *** and **P < 0.0001, 0.001 and 0.01, respectively, before versus 5 min after hypoxia or adenosine infusion.

 
Comparisons between groups

Baseline blood gas data varied slightly between experimental groups, PaO2 was significantly higher in Group 1 than Group 3, PaCO2 was higher in Group 1 and 2 than Group 3 and pHa was lower in Group 1 and 2 than Group 3 (Table 1). There were no differences between groups for baseline values of ABP, FBF or FVC or for magnitude of increases in FVC evoked by hypoxia under control conditions, but the increase in FVC evoked by adenosine was smaller (P < 0.05) in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1. Baseline levels of [NO]a, [NO]v and [NO]v-a did not differ between groups; neither did increases in [NO]v-a evoked by hypoxia or adenosine (see Discussion for further comment).

NOx assay controls

Addition of 12-µl plasma samples to 10 ml 0.1 mol l–1 H2SO4/KI evoked no change in the output from the NO meter. Moreover, control samples containing no NO3 standard caused no detectable increase in the output of the NO meter, demonstrating that the reagents used in the assay had no effect on the NO-sensitive electrode. The assay of the NO3 standards that was performed over the same time period as each set of experimental samples demonstrated a linear relationship between [NO3] and NO produced. The percentage conversion for each set of experimental samples was calculated using the NO3 standards and was factored into the calculation of plasma [NO] in the experimental samples. Mean percentage conversion of NO3 to NO2 for all experiments, calculated from the regression of NO released from various concentrations of a NO3 standard, was 54.7 ± 5.68%.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, both systemic hypoxia (breathing 8% O2) and exogenous adenosine evoked a substantial increase in FVC; these responses being almost abolished and substantially decreased by the NOS inhibitor L-NAME and the A1 receptor antagonist DPCPX, respectively. These results confirm our previous findings and demonstrate that the hypoxia-induced muscle dilatation is mediated, in part, by adenosine acting on A1 receptors and that both the dilatation evoked by hypoxia and that evoked by exogenous adenosine are NO-dependent (Skinner & Marshall, 1996; Bryan & Marshall, 1999a,b; Edmunds & Marshall, 2001a,b).

The new findings of the present study are that both systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion produced an increase in the NO generated from NOx in arterial and venous plasma of skeletal muscle ([NO]a and [NO]v, respectively) and an increase in [NO]v-a across muscle, and these changes were attenuated by L-NAME and by DPCPX. Our interpretation of these findings is that systemic hypoxia and adenosine increased the release of NO into the venous efflux of skeletal muscle. Before discussing this interpretation, it is important to consider the validity of the NO measurements.

Validity of the NO measurements

We have shown previously, as have others (Guo et al. 1996; Simonsen et al. 1999; Ray et al. 2002), that the type of NO electrode used in the present study allows reproducible NO measurements upon calibration within and between experimental days. The protocol used here to evaluate NO release into plasma from changes in [NOx] is novel; that is, reduction of plasma NO3 and NO2, with electrochemical measurement of NO generated from NO2. However, in previous studies, similar methods were used to measure NO released into human skin in microdialysis samples (Clough, 1999), and NO released from cultures of porcine coronary and aortic endothelial cells in vitro (Berkels et al. 2001). The assay of a range of NO3 standards performed along with each set of plasma samples allowed the effectiveness of the protocol to be assessed. In all cases, the conversion of NO3 standards demonstrated a linear relationship for NO released and the percentage conversion of NO3 to NO2 and thence to NO showed very little variation between experimental groups: we deduced that we measured ~55% of the NO held as NOx. In fact, because addition of plasma samples directly to the 0.1 mol l–1 H2SO4/KI reducing solution produced a negligible change in the NO measured, we surmise that the concentration of NO2 in the plasma was not significant and that NO released into plasma was rapidly converted via NO2 to NO3, or was combined in some other form. Moreover, in Group 3, changes in [NO]a, [NO]v and thus [NO]v-a evoked by hypoxia and adenosine infusion were unaffected by drug vehicle over the same time course as the effect of L-NAME and DPCPX seen in Group 1 and 2, respectively, demonstrating that the protocol was highly reproducible.

The relative oxygenation of blood may affect plasma [NO3]. In arterial blood, oxygenated haemoglobin (HbO2) predominates, and the major route of NO metabolism is reaction with HbO2 to form methaemoglobin (metHb) and NO3. In venous blood, more deoxygenated haemoglobin (deoxyHb) is present and a higher proportion of NO generated reacts with deoxyHb to form nitrosylated haemoglobin (HbNO; Jia et al. 1996; Mateo & de Artiñano, 2000). Consequently, the measurement of NO generated from NO3 in venous plasma and therefore the calculation of [NO]v-a is likely to underestimate the amount of NO present under conditions of systemic normoxia. There is likely to be a further underestimation of NO released in systemic hypoxia when there is more deoxyHb in both arterial and venous blood. The reaction of NO with superoxide anions, with haem moieties of molecules other than Hb and with thiol groups on proteins, including Hb, to form S-nitrosothiols (SNO-Hb) (Jia et al. 1996; Mateo & de Artiñano, 2000) will also have contributed to the underestimation of the NO released when [NO3] in plasma is used as an index.

The absolute levels of NOx measured in arterial and venous blood under baseline experimental conditions did not differ significantly between groups. However, Groups 1 and 2 tended to show lower levels than Group 3. Dietary intake of nitrites and nitrates has a major effect on plasma NOx levels, as does urinary excretion of NOx (Green et al. 1981a,b; Wagner et al. 1985). However, all rats used in the present study had been fed on standard rat chow prior to the acute experiments and there is no reason to suppose that the urinary excretion of NOx varied between the groups. There is also no reason to suggest that the balance between absorption of dietary nitrogen metabolites and urinary excretion differed in an age- or weight-related way, as Group 3 had the highest plasma levels of NOx and yet they were similar in age and weight to Group 2; Group 1 were older and heavier (see Methods). Further, there were no differences between the groups in the baselines of the cardiovascular variables (Table 2 and Figs 1–3) that might either explain, or reflect the differences in NOx levels. However, if it is accepted that NO is released into plasma when PaO2 falls, then differences between the groups in their baseline levels of PaO2 (see Table 1) may contribute to differences in their NOx levels: Group 3 had the lowest PaO2 and the highest NOx levels, while Group 1 had the highest PaO2 and the lowest NOx levels.

As far as the aims of the present study are concerned, what matters is not the absolute level of NOx, but the changes in [NOx] evoked by hypoxia and adenosine. Changes in [NOx] measured in samples taken only 5 min apart over a period of hypoxia or adenosine infusion could not have reflected changes in urinary excretion of NOx: the half-life of NO3 in plasma has been calculated at 1.5 h in mice (Veszelovszky et al. 1995) and as much as 3.8 h in dogs (Zeballos et al. 1995). Rather, they are more likely to have reflected changes in the NO released into the blood. The fact that both systemic hypoxia and adenosine infusion caused an increase in [NO]a, [NO]v and in [NO]v-a across hindlimb muscle demonstrates that both stimuli release NO from skeletal muscle. The measurements made in Group 3 clearly showed that within a given group of rats, the release of NO caused by both stimuli is highly reproducible over time.

Thus, taking all these factors into consideration, we conclude that the changes in plasma [NO] presented here may have underestimated the total amount of NO released and available to act on vascular smooth muscle to evoke vasodilatation, but they do give a reliable indication of the amount of NO released from muscle by systemic hypoxia and adenosine.

NO release during hypoxia- and adenosine-induced muscle vasodilatation

With these provisos, the fact that the increases in [NO]a, [NO]v and [NO]v-a evoked by hypoxia and adenosine in Group 1 were attenuated by L-NAME, demonstrates that these changes reflected the new synthesis of NO by NOS rather than the release of NO into plasma from HbNO, or from nitrosothiol compounds including SNO-Hb (see Jia et al. 1996). It might be argued that the increases in [NO]v-a were partly due to an increase in shear stress associated with the muscle vasodilator responses evoked by these stimuli. This seems very unlikely for in response to both stimuli, the evoked increase in FVC balanced the associated fall in ABP such that there was no change in FBF (see Table 2). Under these circumstances, it is unlikely that shear stress increased sufficiently to cause NO synthesis (see also Ray et al. 2002).

As L-NAME inhibits the tonic synthesis of NO by NOS as evidenced by the decrease in baseline FVC, a decrease in baseline NOx levels might have been expected. The fact that L-NAME had no significant influence on [NO]a, [NO]v or [NO]v-a during air breathing suggests that plasma [NOx] is maintained even in the absence of NO synthesis, as has been noted before (Sawada et al. 1994). This could be explained by liberation of NO and formation of NO2 and NO3 from the various NO stores. In particular, because L-NAME and DPCPX both increased baseline PaO2 by ~10 mmHg, presumably by removing inhibitory effects of NO and adenosine on ventilation (Thomas et al. 1994; Gozal et al. 1997), this may have allowed a greater transfer of NO already held as HbNO, to the cysteine group on Hb, so forming SNO-Hb at the lungs during oxygenation of Hb and allowing more NO to be released during arterial–venous transit through the circulation to form NOx (Jia et al. 1996).

Taken together with the results discussed above, the finding that the increases in [NO]a, [NO]v and [NO]v-a evoked by systemic hypoxia and by adenosine infusion in Group 2 were attenuated by DPCPX, indicates that during systemic hypoxia, adenosine acting at A1 receptors is responsible for increased synthesis and release of NO from skeletal muscle. These findings do not exclude the possibility that systemic hypoxia and/or adenosine infusion also caused an increase in the synthesis and release of NO that was not mediated by A1 receptor stimulation: given the variance of the [NO] data, we cannot deduce with any certainty whether the apparent, small increase in [NO]v-a in response to both stimuli after administration of DPCPX (see Fig. 2C) was real.

Our hypothesis is that the NO released by these stimuli contributes to the accompanying increases in FVC. Thus, some consideration must be given to the fact that the magnitude of the vasodilator responses evoked by hypoxia and adenosine infusion were not directly related to the magnitude of the accompanying increases in [NO]v-a (see Figs 1–3). First, it should be noted that in Group 1, the increase in FVC evoked by hypoxia and adenosine were similar as we intended, whereas the increases in FVC evoked by adenosine infusion in Groups 2 and 3 were substantially smaller than those evoked by hypoxia, even though we infused adenosine at the same dose per kilogram body weight. This may reflect the fact that the rats of Groups 2 and 3 were substantially younger than those of Group 1: there is evidence that dilator responsiveness to adenosine is weak or absent in neonates and increases with maturity (Laudignon et al. 1990; Elnazir et al. 1996). Second, in Group 2, the selective A1 receptor antagonist DPCPX, decreased the muscle vasodilator response evoked by hypoxia by only ~30%, whereas in most of our previous studies, ~50% of the hypoxia-induced muscle dilatation was mediated by adenosine and/or by A1 receptor stimulation (e.g. Skinner & Marshall, 1996; Bryan & Marshall, 1999a). The explanation for this disparity may also lie in the size and age of the animals. In most of our previous studies, the rats weighed > 300 g (Skinner & Marshall, 1996; Bryan & Marshall, 1999a) and so were comparable to those of Group 1. By contrast, in our recent study (Ray et al. 2002), the mean weight of the rats was comparable to Groups 2 and 3 and adenosine receptor blockade reduced the increase in FVC evoked by breathing 8% O2 by only ~23%.

Thus, there is clearly variation, which seems age-related, in the magnitude of the muscle vasodilatation evoked by hypoxia and adenosine infusion and in the contribution of A1 receptor stimulation to these responses, even though our previous studies (Bryan & Marshall, 1999a) and the results of Group 3, show that within a group of animals of similar age, the muscle vasodilator responses evoked by hypoxia and by adenosine infusion are reproducible.

Seen in this context, the apparent disparity between the evoked increases in FVC and in [NO]v-a may be explained by differences in the balance of the various contributors to the dilator responses. The responses evoked by hypoxia and exogenous adenosine not only reflect the local actions of these stimuli, but the magnitude of these responses are also affected by the vasoconstrictor influences of the increase in sympathetic nerve activity evoked by peripheral chemoreceptor stimulation and/or baroreceptor unloading and by the vasoconstrictor and dilator influences of hormones such as vasopressin and adrenaline (see Marshall, 1994). It should also be noted that exogenous adenosine can evoke vasodilatation in hindlimb muscle in an NO-independent, as well as in a NO-dependent manner (Bryan & Marshall, 1999b). Further, we do not know the extent to which the NO collected in venous plasma originates from the vessels that contribute to changes in FVC (for further discussion, see below). In other words, there is no reason to expect a simple direct relationship within or between groups for the increase in [NO]v-a evoked by the stimuli we used and the accompanying increase in FVC.

Origin of the NO

The increase in NO output evoked by adenosine infusion was probably the result of generation of NO by endothelial NOS (eNOS) rather than by neuronal NOS (nNOS) present in skeletal muscle or sympathetic neurones (Michel & Feron, 1997), as adenosine is rapidly taken up and metabolized by endothelial cells and is unlikely to have reached extravascular tissues (see Ray et al. 2002). Further, the evidence available suggests that the adenosine released during systemic hypoxia is of endothelial, rather than skeletal muscle origin (see Mian & Marshall, 1991b; Mo & Ballard, 2001; Edmunds et al. 2003). Thus, it is likely that this endogenous adenosine acts back on the endothelial cells via A1 receptors to stimulate eNOS and release NO. Consistent with this, in in vitro studies on rat aorta and iliac artery in which NO was measured using an NO-sensitive electrode, adenosine stimulated the synthesis and release of NO from the endothelium (Ray et al. 2002).

Given that both L-NAME and DPCPX reduced the hypoxia- and adenosine-evoked increases in FVC and the accompanying increases in [NO]v-a, and because changes in FVC largely reflect behaviour of proximal arterioles (see Introduction), it is likely that some of the NO released came from the endothelium of proximal arterioles. If so, then the dilatation of proximal arterioles is NO-mediated as well as NO-dependent, providing that eNOS activity is present (see Introduction; Edmunds & Marshall, 2003; Edmunds et al. 2003). A further portion of the NO release probably originated from the terminal arterioles, which we have already deduced show adenosine A1-, NO-mediated dilatation during systemic hypoxia (Edmunds et al. 2003). Finally, capillaries of skeletal muscle show NO-dependent dilatation in response to bradykinin (Mitchell & Tyml, 1996), while venous vessels show NO-dependent dilatation in response to agonists (Blackman et al. 2000) and adenosine-mediated dilatation in response to systemic hypoxia (Mian & Marshall, 1991b), and venous endothelial cells generate NO in response to a range of agonists (Vedernikov et al. 1988; Vallance et al. 1989; Pawloski & Chapnick, 1993; Hamilton et al. 1997; Sobrevia et al. 1997). This raises the possibility that the capillaries and venous vessels of skeletal muscle also contributed to NO released in response to systemic hypoxia and adenosine.

In summary, the results of the present study show for the first time, that NO is released into venous effluent of skeletal muscle by acute systemic hypoxia and by exogenous adenosine. They indicate that the NO most probably originated from the vascular endothelium and that it is newly synthesized by NOS activity arising, at least in part, from the action of adenosine on A1 receptors. The NO released makes a major contribution to hypoxia- and adenosine-induced muscle vasodilatation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Berkels R, Purol-Schnabel S & Roesen R (2001). A new method to measure nitrate/nitrite with a NO-sensitive electrode. J Appl Physiol 90, 317–320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blackman DJ, Morris-Thurgood JA, Atherton JJ, Ellis GR, Anderson RA, Cockcroft JR & Frenneaux MP (2000). Endothelium-derived nitric oxide contributes to the regulation of venous tone in humans. Circulation 101, 165–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bryan PT & Marshall JM (1999a). Adenosine receptor subtypes and vasodilatation in rat skeletal muscle during systemic hypoxia: a role for A1 receptors. J Physiol 514, 151–162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bryan PT & Marshall JM (1999b). Cellular mechanisms by which adenosine induces vasodilatation in rat skeletal muscle: significance for systemic hypoxia. J Physiol 514, 163–175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Clough GF (1999). Role of nitric oxide in the regulation of microvascular perfusion in human skin in vivo. J Physiol 516, 549–557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Coates J, Sheehan MJ & Strong P (1994). 1,3-Dipropyl-8-cyclopentyl xanthine (DPCPX): a useful tool for pharmacologists and physiologists? Gen Pharmacol 25, 387–394.[Medline]

Daly JW, Padgett W, Butts-Lamb P & Waters J (1985). 1,3-Dialkyl-8-(p-sulfophenyl) xanthines: potent water-soluble antagonists for A1- and A2-adenosine receptors. J Med Chem 28, 487–492.[CrossRef][Medline]

Edmunds NJ & Marshall JM (2001a). Vasodilatation, oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption in rat hindlimb during systemic hypoxia: roles of nitric oxide. J Physiol 532, 251–259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Edmunds NJ & Marshall JM (2001b). Oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption in rat hindlimb during systemic hypoxia: role of adenosine. J Physiol 536, 927–935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Edmunds NJ & Marshall JM (2003). The roles of nitric oxide in dilating proximal and terminal arterioles of skeletal muscle during systemic hypoxia. J Vasc Res 40, 68–76.[CrossRef][Medline]

Edmunds NJ, Moncada S & Marshall JM (2003). Does nitric oxide allow endothelial cells to sense hypoxia and mediate hypoxic vasodilatation? In vivo and in vitro studies. J Physiol 546, 521–527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Elnazir B, Marshall JM & Kumar P (1996). Postnatal development of the pattern of respiratory and cardiovascular response to systemic hypoxia in the piglet: the roles of adenosine. J Physiol 492, 573–585.[Medline]

Frisbee JC, Maier KG, Falck JR, Roman RJ & Lombard JH (2002). Integration of hypoxic dilation signalling pathways for skeletal muscle resistance arteries. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283, R309–R319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gozal D, Gozal E, Torres JE, Gozal YM, Nuckton TJ & Hornby PJ (1997). Nitric oxide modulates ventilatory responses to hypoxia in the developing rat. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155, 1755–1762.[Abstract]

Green LC, Ruiz de Luzuriga K, Wagner DA, Rand W, Istfan N, Young VR & Tannenbaum SR (1981a). Nitrate biosynthesis in man. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78, 7764–7768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Green LC, Tannenbaum SR & Goldman P (1981b). Nitrate synthesis in the germfree and conventional rat. Science 212, 56–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guo J-P, Murohara T, Buerke M, Scalia R & Lefer AM (1996). Direct measurement of nitric oxide release from vascular endothelial cells. J Appl Physiol 81, 774–779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hamilton CA, Berg G, McIntyre M, McPhaden AR, Reid JL & Dominiczak AF (1997). Effects of nitric oxide and superoxide on relaxation in human artery and vein. Atherosclerosis 133, 77–86.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hebert MT & Marshall JM (1988). Direct observations of the effects of baroreceptor stimulation on skeletal muscle circulation of the rat. J Physiol 400, 45–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Iwamoto J, Yang S-P, Yoshinaga M, Krasney E & Krasney J (1992). N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine influences cerebral metabolism in awake sheep. J Appl Physiol 73, 2233–2240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jia L, Bonaventura C, Bonaventura J & Stamler JS (1996). S-nitrosohaemoglobin: a dynamic activity of blood involved in vascular control. Nature 380, 221–226.[CrossRef][Medline]

Laudignon N, Aranda JV & Varma DR (1990). Effects of adenosine and its analogues on isolated internal carotid arteries from newborn and adult pigs. Biol Neonate 58, 91–97.[Medline]

Marshall JM (1994). Peripheral chemoreceptors and cardiovascular regulation. Physiol Rev 74, 543–594.[Free Full Text]

Mateo AO & de Artiñano MAA (2000). Nitric oxide reactivity and mechanisms involved in its biological effects. Pharmacol Res 42, 421–427.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mian R & Marshall JM (1991a). The role of adenosine in dilator responses induced in arterioles and venules of rat skeletal muscle by systemic hypoxia. J Physiol 443, 499–511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mian R & Marshall JM (1991b). The roles of catecholamines in responses evoked in arterioles and venules of rat skeletal muscle by systemic hypoxia. J Physiol 436, 499–510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Michel T & Feron O (1997). Perspective series: nitric oxide and nitric oxide synthases. Nitric oxide synthases: which, where, how, and why? J Clin Invest 100, 2146–2152.[Medline]

Mitchell D & Tyml K (1996). Nitric oxide release in rat skeletal muscle capillary. Am J Physiol 270, H1696–H1703.[Medline]

Mo FM & Ballard HJ (2001). The effect of systemic hypoxia on interstitial and blood adenosine, AMP, ADP and ATP in dog skeletal muscle. J Physiol 536, 593–603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pawloski JR & Chapnick BM (1993). Leukotrienes C4 and D4 are potent endothelium-dependent relaxing agents in canine splanchnic venous capacitance vessels. Circ Res 73, 395–404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pohl U & Busse R (1989). Hypoxia stimulates release of endothelium-derived relaxant factor. Am J Physiol 256, H1595–H1600.[Medline]

Ray CJ, Abbas MR, Coney AM & Marshall JM (2002). Interactions of adenosine, prostaglandins and nitric oxide in hypoxia-induced vasodilatation: in vivo and in vitro studies. J Physiol 544, 195–209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sawada Y, Sakamaki T, Nakamura T, Sato K, Ono Z & Murata K (1994). Release of nitric oxide in response to acetylcholine is unaltered in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens 12, 745–750.[Medline]

Shaul PW, Farrar MA & Zeller TM (1992). Oxygen modulates endothelium-derived relaxing factor production in fetal pulmonary arteries. Am J Physiol 262, H355–H364.[Medline]

Simonsen U, Wadsworth RM, Buus NH & Mulvany MJ (1999). In vitro simultaneous measurements of relaxation and nitric oxide concentration in rat superior mesenteric artery. J Physiol 516, 271–282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Skinner MR & Marshall JM (1996). Studies on the roles of ATP, adenosine and nitric oxide in mediating muscle vasodilatation induced in the rat by acute systemic hypoxia. J Physiol 495, 553–560.[Medline]

Sobrevia L, Yudilevich DL & Mann GE (1997). Activation of A2-purinoceptors by adenosine stimulates L-arginine transport (system y+) and nitric oxide synthesis in human fetal endothelial cells. J Physiol 499, 135–140.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sun M-K & Reis DJ (1992). Evidence nitric oxide mediates the vasodepressor response to hypoxia in sino-denervated rats. Life Sci 50, 555–565.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thomas T, Elnazir BK & Marshall JM (1994). Differentiation of the peripherally mediated from the centrally mediated influences of adenosine in the rat during systemic hypoxia. Exp Physiol 79, 809–822.[Abstract]

Vallance P, Collier J & Moncada S (1989). Nitric oxide synthesised from L-arginine mediates endothelium dependent dilatation in human veins in vivo. Cardiovasc Res 23, 1053–1057.[Medline]

Vedernikov YP, Graser T, Tiedt N & Vikhert AM (1988). Heterogeneity of the response of venous smooth muscle to arterial endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) in respect of the role of nitric oxide. Basic Res Cardiol 83, 122–127.[CrossRef][Medline]

Veszelovszky E, Holford NHG, Thomsen LL, Knowles RG & Baguley BC (1995). Plasma nitrate clearance in mice: modeling of the systemic production of nitrate following the induction of nitric oxide synthesis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 36, 155–159.[Medline]

Wagner DA, Moldawer LL, Pomposelli JJ, Tannenbaum SR & Young VR (1985). Nitrate biosynthesis in the rat: precursor-product relationships with respect to ammonia. Biochem J 232, 547–551.[Medline]

Zeballos GA, Bernstein RD, Thompson CI, Forfia PR, Seyedi N, Shen W, Kaminski PM, Wolin MS & Hintze TH (1995). Pharmacodynamics of plasma nitrate/nitrite as an indication of nitric oxide formation in conscious dogs. Circulation 91, 2982–2988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


    Acknowledgements
 
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the PhD studentship awarded to C.J.R. by the School of Medicine, University of Birmingham, which allowed this work to be carried out.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Marshall
The roles of adenosine and related substances in exercise hyperaemia
J. Physiol., September 15, 2007; 583(3): 835 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. Winter and K. A. Dora
Spreading dilatation to luminal perfusion of ATP and UTP in rat isolated small mesenteric arteries
J. Physiol., July 1, 2007; 582(1): 335 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Cappello, T. Angelone, B. Tota, P. Pagliaro, C. Penna, R. Rastaldo, A. Corti, G. Losano, and M. C. Cerra
Human recombinant chromogranin A-derived vasostatin-1 mimics preconditioning via an adenosine/nitric oxide signaling mechanism
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H719 - H727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. L. Clanton
Hypoxia-induced reactive oxygen species formation in skeletal muscle
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2007; 102(6): 2379 - 2388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. P. Walsh and J. M. Marshall
The early effects of chronic hypoxia on the cardiovascular system in the rat: role of nitric oxide
J. Physiol., August 15, 2006; 575(1): 263 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. P. Walsh and J. M. Marshall
The role of adenosine in the early respiratory and cardiovascular changes evoked by chronic hypoxia in the rat
J. Physiol., August 15, 2006; 575(1): 277 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
568/3/967    most recent
jphysiol.2005.094854v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. J
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, C. J
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. M


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS