|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular And Genomic |
1 University of Michigan, Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50 mV positive to V01/2, leading to a pattern of outward currents distinct from that of Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels. The effective valency of spermine block (Z0) was highest in Kir2.2 channels while the valencies in Kir2.1 and Kir2.3 channels were not significantly different. The voltage dependence of spermine unblock was similar in all Kir2 channels, but the rates of unblock were
7-fold and
16-fold slower in Kir2.3 channels than those in Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 when measured at high and physiological extracellular K+, respectively. In all Kir2 channels, the instantaneous phase of activation was present. The instantaneous phase was difficult to resolve at high extracellular K+ but it became evident and accounted for nearly 3050% of the total current when recorded at physiological extracellular K+. In conclusion, the data are consistent with the universal mechanism of rectification in Kir2 channels, but also point to significant, and physiologically important, quantitative differences between Kir2 isoforms.
(Received 29 August 2005;
accepted after revision 16 December 2005;
first published online 22 December 2005)
Corresponding author A. N. Lopatin: Room 7812 Medical Science II 0622, 1150 W Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0622, USA. Email: alopatin{at}umich.edu
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kir2.x subunits were cloned from mouse genomic DNA using a PCR-based technique and sequenced to check for potential errors. Primers were designed using Vector NTI software (Invitrogen, USA). The channels were subcloned into a pIRES-GFP expression vector (Clontech, USA). In some experiments, a Kir2.3-YFP fusion protein was used to achieve better success rates for selection of highly expressing cells. YFP (yellow fluorescent protein, Clontech) was attached to the C-terminus of the channel without a linker. Site-directed mutagenesis was also done by a PCR-based technique using overlapping primers containing the desired altered sequences.
Cultured cell transfection
HEK 293 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium (DMEM) plus 10% calf serum, and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic (Invitrogen, USA) at 37°C, 5% CO2. Cells were plated on 35 mm plates containing a glass coverslip 30 h prior to transfection. Cells were transfected with DNA constructs (12 µg) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After the
4 h required for DNA uptake into the cells, the media was changed, and sodium butyrate (5 mM; Sigma) was added for 12 h to increase expression (Moyer et al. 1998). Cells were used for recordings 13 days post transfection.
Patch-clamp recordings
Ionic currents from HEK 293 cells were recorded in whole-cell, inside-out and outside-out configurations (Hamill et al. 1981), using an Axopatch 200B amplifier, Digidata 1322A and pCLAMP 8.2 software (Axon Instruments, USA). Micropipettes (no. 73813, Kimble Glass Co., USA), were pulled on a horizontal puller (Sutter Instruments, USA). The patch-clamp set-up was as previously described (McLerie & Lopatin, 2003). Pipette resistance varied from 1 to 2 M
.
Whole-cell recordings.
In all whole-cell recordings, the series resistance (Rs) was compensated 80%, and cells with an uncompensated Rs > 4 M
were discarded from analysis. The majority of whole-cell recordings were performed within 24 min after establishing whole-cell configuration in order to minimize washout of endogenous PAs and Mg2+. Typical increase of the outward current at 45 min was less than 20%. Importantly, for all channels, the currents were recorded under the same conditions within the same short period of time. Voltages were not corrected for a liquid junction potential. HEK 293 cells were bathed in modified Tyrode solution (for solution compositions see Solutions below) and pipettes were filled with KINT solution containing 2 mM K2ATP. KINT but not FVPP pipette solution was used in whole-cell experiments to avoid a relatively (compared to Spm) fast diffusion of pyrophosphate, a known binding agent of PAs, into the cell, which would lead to a change in the free concentration of PAs. Kir2 currents were measured in response to a 4 s voltage ramp from 120 to +20 mV from a holding potential (Vh) of 75 mV. Correction for minor linear leak was performed off-line by bringing the reversal potential of corrected Kir current to 80 mV.
Inside-out recordings. The pipettes were filled with KINT solution (0 ATP). Patches were first excised into a PA- and Mg2+-free FVPP bath solution (below) to wash out endogenous PAs, and then Spm was applied at a desired concentration. With the exception of E224G and E229S mutant channels, steady-state currents were recorded using a series of 150 ms voltage steps to potentials between 90 and +60 mV preceded by a 10 ms prepulse to 80 or 70 mV from a holding potential of 0 mV. A minor linear leak was estimated and corrected for off-line by measuring current at +60 mV remaining after application of 300 µM Spm. Voltage pulses were prolonged to 600800 ms and extended to +100 mV to accommodate the slow Spm block and weak rectification in E224G and E229S channels. Correspondingly, the amount of leakage was estimated by running down the current with Ag+ ions applied to the intracellular side of the patch.
Outside-out recordings.
For experiments in the outside-out configuration FVPP was used as a pipette intracellular solution. Using FVPP significantly slowed down channel rundown, which we believe is primarily caused by unknown high valency cations leaching from the pipette glass. The total amount of Spm added was 30 µM. It should be noted that pyrophosphate in FVPP solution is a potent chelator of Spm. According to our measurements (authors' unpublished observations) 30 µM total Spm corresponds to
7 µM free Spm. Extracellular K+-free solution was used to isolate Kir currents (Ishihara et al. 1989).
Current activation (PA unblock) was evoked using a series of hyperpolarizing steps from a Vh of 30 mV to potentials up to 130 mV (whole-cell), and from a Vh of +50 mV to potentials up to 80 mV (inside-out). The P/4 procedure with a subsweep holding level of 0 to +20 mV in whole-cell recordings, and +60 mV in inside-out recordings was used to subtract the capacitance transients from the activation current records.
The data were not corrected for a
4 mV voltage shift due to small asymmetry in the K+ concentration between KINT and FVPP solutions.
Solutions
Modified Tyrode solution (mM): 137 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 0.5 MgCl2, 0.3 CaCl2, 0.16 NaH2PO4, 3 NaHCO3, 5 Hepes, 5 glucose, pH 7.35 with NaOH.
KINT (mM): 130 KCl, 1 EGTA, 10 Hepes, 2 K2ATP, pH 7.35 with KOH (estimated
150 mM K+).
FVPP (mM): 95 KCl, 0.1 Na3VO4, 10 K4P207, KF, 10 Hepes, 1 EGTA, pH = 7.35 (estimated
145 mM K+) with KOH.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel (2000) and Clampfit 8.2 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA).
Since residual rectification is always present even after careful washout of PAs, as well as due to the presence of contaminating ions (Guo & Lu, 2002), the currents in the absence of Spm in wild-type Kir2 and some mutant channels were approximated by a linear model (Lopatin & Nichols, 1996a) I=
(V Vrev), with the slope conductance (
) equal to that of corresponding chord conductance at far negative membrane potentials. Unblocked IV relationships for E224G and E299S mutant channels are not linear. Thus, the IV relationships in the absence of Spm were first fitted at negative membrane potentials to a modified Goldman current equation incorporating a surface charge according to the equation:
|
|
are membrane potential and internal surface potential, respectively.
=F/RT, where R, T and F are the universal gas constant, absolute temperature (300 K) and Faraday constant, respectively.
is a scaling factor. The equation was extrapolated to the depolarized potentials, and then used for calculations of the relative current.
Relative currents were calculated as a ratio between currents in the presence of Spm and the unblocked current approximation, then fitted with the sum of two Boltzmann functions:
|
|
The small voltage region (
±2 mV) around the reversal potential was excluded from the fits.
The mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) is used throughout the text. A two-tailed unpaired t test with equal variances was used for estimation of statistical significance of the differences which were considered significant if P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Steady-state rectification properties of Kir2 channels were first studied in inside-out patches exposed to a high concentration (
150 mM) symmetrical K+, with 0 and 300 µM Spm on the intracellular side of the membrane. All channels rectified strongly in the presence of Spm, but displayed a different degree of block at far negative potentials (Fig. 1A and B). Specifically, in the presence of 300 µM Spm and at a 90 mV membrane potential, only Kir2.3 channels were nearly completely unblocked while
80% and
60% (P < 0.01) of Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels, respectively, remained unblocked under the same conditions (Fig. 1B). Relative currents (Fig. 1C) obtained from experiments as in Fig. 1A display two distinct phases of rectification: one shallow (component 1) and one steep (component 0) (Lopatin et al. 1995; Xie et al. 2002; Shin & Lu, 2005). Table 1 summarizes the parameters of rectification obtained by fitting relative currents (Irel) measured at 300 µM Spm with a double Boltzmann equation. The V11/2 component of block was difficult to characterize at lower concentrations of Spm, but it could be easily observed at 100 and 300 µM. The major difference between Kir2 channels was observed in the voltage of half-block for the shallow component 1 (V11/2), while the V01/2 for the steep component (0) of rectification was similar in all channels (Fig. 1D). Specifically, V11/2 in Kir2.3 channels was
12 and
23 mV more positive than that in Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels, respectively. In addition, the effective valency Z0 for the steep component of Spm block in Kir2.2 channels was significantly higher than in Kir2.1 and Kir2.3 channels. Consistent with the latter, a close inspection of relative currents revealed that both Kir2.1 and Kir2.3 channels also display a
2-fold (P < 0.05) higher conductance at the reversal potential than Kir2.2 channels (not shown).
|
|
|
To further investigate the differential properties of Kir2 isoforms under conditions similar to those used for measurements of IK1 in cardiac myocytes, we examined Kir2 currents in the whole-cell configuration with a physiological (low) extracellular K+ concentration. Initially, whole-cell experiments were designed to look more carefully at the outward component of the currents at low extracellular K+, which was quite a challenging task in excised patch configurations due to relatively small current densities. No Spm was added to the pipette (intracellular) solutions in initial experiments, so only undefined cytosolic concentrations of PAs and other unknown potential factors were present. Recordings of Kir2 currents were made within a few minutes after establishment of the whole-cell configuration to minimize PA washout. Figure 2A shows averaged whole-cell recordings for each of the channels. It should be noted that the level of channel expression was quite different for different Kir isoforms: Kir2.1 channels displayed the highest level of expression, while it was smallest for Kir2.3 channels. All Kir2 channels showed strong inward rectification, although clear differences in their rectification profile at depolarized potentials were apparent. Figure 2B shows the same currents as in Fig. 2A, but normalized at 120 mV. In contrast to Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels, Kir2.3 channels did not seem to rectify completely even at +20 mV, and displayed a weak region of negative slope conductance. The above results are similar to the shallow and incomplete rectification reported in Kir2.3 channels by Dhamoon et al. (2004). To test whether the incomplete and weak rectification at depolarized potentials might be explained by a low level of intracellular PAs (or PA washout), in a series of experiments we included 1 mM Spm in the patch pipette solution and allowed it to wash in for 512 min. An example in Fig. 2C shows that although the amplitude of inward Kir2.3 current was significantly decreased at hyperpolarizing membrane potentials (100 mV; confirming Spm washing-in), a smaller reduction in the outward current was observed at intermediate depolarized potentials (40 mV). Also, Spm failed to affect currents in any significant way at far depolarized potentials (+20 mV). Similar results were observed in four other experiments. In addition, extension of the ramp pulse to +50 mV also failed to bring Kir2.3 current to the small levels observed with Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels at even less depolarized potentials (see Discussion).
|
One of the major concerns in studying Kir2 currents in the whole-cell mode is that although the absolute total current amplitudes may seem quite large (several nA), the current densities (pA pF1) are relatively low, and thus quantification of small density currents may potentially be compromised by the presence of unknown endogenous conductances originating from the whole membrane of the cell as well as from some unknown intracellular factors affecting the properties of Kir2 channels. Using Ba2+ to isolate small Kir2 currents may not be sufficient as other endogenous currents (potentially induced by Kir2 channel expression) may also be sensitive to Ba2+ ions. Specifically, the problem is manifested with Kir2.3 channels, which display severalfold lower current densities than Kir2.1 channels, and therefore questions arise about their true rectification profile. Additionally, quantitative control over the concentrations of intracellular PAs, especially the longer Spm, as well as other potentially important unknown intracellular factors is virtually impossible. Lastly, the origin of small endogenous currents or the nature of intracellular factors potentially affecting Kir2 channels in whole-cell recordings may be difficult to identify and thus alternative currently available approaches are highly desirable.
To alleviate the above difficulties and to achieve precise control over the composition of solutions on both sides of the membrane, we measured Kir2 currents in the outside-out configuration. Surprisingly, in multiple outside-out patches the amplitude of inward Kir2.3 current was comparable to that routinely obtained in the whole-cell configuration (see also Dhamoon et al. 2004). Whether the above phenomenon is due to potential clustering of Kir2.3 channels or due to some other mechanism is unknown.
Relative currents in Kir2 channels were measured at different extracellular K+ concentrations in outside-out patches in the presence of a physiological (
7 µM free Spm; close to that in cardiac myocytes, Yan et al. 2005) concentration of Spm, and data fitted with the sum of two Boltzmann equations (n= 2, 2 and 3 patches for Kir2.1, Kir2.2 and Kir2.3, respectively). Figure 3 and Table 2 combine the data.
|
|
), accompanied by an increase in outward current amplitude upon an increase in extracellular K+. While Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 current profiles were similar, Kir2.3 channels displayed quite a different pattern of outward currents, which is qualitatively characterized by a more shallow voltage dependence. The rectification properties of Kir2.3 shown in Fig. 3C are different than that obtained from whole-cell recordings (Fig. 2), and in sharp contrast to other whole-cell data (Dhamoon et al. 2004), which suggests that the lack of a classical crossover effect in whole-cell recordings is potentially explained by either contamination with other unknown endogenous currents or by some unknown endogenous factors. A more detailed analysis of rectification revealed a number of important similarities and differences between Kir2 isoforms. Effective valencies Z0 and Z2 for a steep (component 0) and a shallow phase (component 2) of rectification, respectively, did not show K+ dependence (r2 regression 0.10.3), and thus the data for each particular channel obtained at different K+ concentrations were pooled together. In Table 2, V01/2 and V21/2 voltages represent the linear fits to the data in Fig. 3 extrapolated to 0 mV (equivalent to true symmetrical K+).
Inspection of the data in Table 2 shows that the voltage dependence of the steep part of rectification Z0 is nearly the same for Kir2.1 and Kir2.3 channels, and is highest in Kir2.2 channels, consistent with the data obtained at high concentrations of Spm in inside-out patches (Table 1). More dramatic differences are observed at far depolarized potentials. The V21/2 voltages for half-block of the shallow component 2 differed by nearly 20 mV between Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 channels, with Kir2.1 channels being intermediate. The effective valencies of the shallow component 2 (Z2) were roughly 2-fold smaller than those of the steep component (Z0).
One of the parameters important for understanding the mechanism of Kir2 channel block is the difference between the voltages of half-block for different components di,j=Vi1/2Vj1/2, which we will call a separation voltage (see Discussion). For example, the separation voltage between the shallow component 2 and the steep component 0 of block d2,0 reaches
36,
26 and
50 mV in Kir2.1, Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 channels, respectively.
The K+ dependence of rectification parameters shows remarkable similarities between Kir2 channels. Figure 3E is an example of the data for Kir2.1 channels showing that relative currents shift essentially without any significant change in shape upon an increase in extracellular K+ concentration. Detailed analysis of K+ dependence of individual components revealed that in all Kir2 channels the dependence of both V01/2 and V21/2 on Erev can be described by a linear function (Fig. 3F) according to the equation Vi1/2=kiErev+Vi1/2 (0 mV), with coefficients of proportionality ki close to 1 within a few percent precision (Table 2).
Spermine dependence of shallow component 2 rectification
It has been previously shown that, similar to shallow component 1 in Kir2.1 channels, shallow component 2, observed at lower [Spm], is also dependent on the level of Spm (Guo & Lu, 2000; Ishihara & Ehara, 2004). Consistent with the above, we found, using inside-out patches at high symmetrical K+, that shallow component 2 in Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 channels also displayed a strong dependence on [Spm] (Figs 4 and 9A). Similar to V11/2 and V01/2, V21/2 shifted to more depolarized potentials as the Spm concentration decreased.
|
It is well established that shallow component 1 of rectification is affected by several mutations in the inner vestibule of Kir2.1 channels. We performed additional experiments to investigate whether shallow component 2 is also affected by the same, or similar, manipulations in the inner vestibule. In addition to previously reported E224G, E299S and F254A mutations (Taglialatela et al. 1995; Yang et al. 1995; Kubo & Murata, 2001; Shin et al. 2005) we have also tested two novel mutations, S256I and S256K, which we believe might potentially be involved in the rectification process (Fig. 5).
|
3040% and 36 mV, respectively (not shown), in this and other similar studies. The major differences in rectification between E224G and E299S, and wild-type Kir2.1 channels, and thus any major conclusions of this study, are not affected in any significant manner by the above underestimation.
All mutations affected the shallow component 1 (measured at 300 µM Spm), but to different degrees (Fig. 6). In E224G, E299S and F254A mutants, shallow component 1 was nearly abolished (the amplitude was too small to be measured with certainty), in S256I it was barely affected, and in S256K it was reduced, but still clearly present (Fig. 6B). Importantly, in the presence of 300 µM Spm, both E224G and E299S mutants displayed another component which would correspond to component 2 observed at lower [Spm] in wild-type Kir2 channels (Fig. 6B; arrowhead). The V21/2 potential,
90 mV, for these mutants was close to the maximum depolarization used in the experimental protocol, while the steep component of rectification was barely affected, assuming the underestimation of V01/2 due to slow blocking kinetics in these mutants (Table 3). In addition, close inspection of F254A records at 300 µM Spm also reveals a relatively small but detectable deviation of the data from a single Boltzmann fit at depolarized potentials (Fig. 6B; arrowhead), which would indicate the presence of an additional component at potentials positive to the steep component 0. Indeed, analysis of relative currents at 30 µM Spm revealed a significant shallow component 2 in F254A channels with V21/2 potential
20 mV more positive to that of wild-type Kir2.1 channels, and close to that in Kir2.3 channels (Tables 2 and 4). Consistent with the data at 300 µM Spm, E299S channels displayed an even more prominent component 2 at 30 µM Spm with V21/2 potential
100 mV, close to the maximum test potential used in voltage protocols.
|
|
|
Altogether the data point to a strong relation between the two shallow components of rectification (see Discussion).
Kir2.3 channels display unique kinetics of activation
Inside-out recordings high K+.
In parallel with the differences in steady-state rectification, unblock (activation) kinetics of Spm were also different between different Kir2 isoforms. Figure 7A shows that activation of Kir2.3 channels at negative membrane potentials is significantly slower than in Kir2.1 (and Kir2.2; not shown) channels. Quantitative analysis using monoexponential fits of current activation shows that the voltage dependence of activation was not significantly different between Kir2 isoforms (Fig. 7B), but the activation time constant (
) for Kir2.3 channels at 60 mV was
7-fold larger than in Kir2.1 channels (Fig. 7C). Kir2.2 channels displayed kinetics of activation that were nearly indistinguishable from those in Kir2.1 channels (Fig. 7B). Importantly, and in contrast to the time course of current activation in the whole-cell configuration under physiological external [K+] (below; Fig. 8), no significant instantaneous component of activation was observed in any of the Kir2 channels.
|
|
16-fold slower than that in Kir2.1 or Kir2.2 channels (Fig. 8C), in contrast to a
7-fold difference observed in inside-out patches. Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channel kinetics were not significantly different. The small difference in the slope of the voltage dependence between Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels is probably due to voltage errors associated with the higher densities of Kir2.1 currents. Thus, in spite of great differences in the speed of activation between Kir2.3 and Kir2.1/2.2 channels, the voltage dependence of activation was not significantly different between any of them. In experiments when no Spm was added to the pipette (intracellular) solution we also observed a clear outward current transient upon depolarization back to 30 mV, indicating the low intracellular PA content of the HEK 293 cells (not shown).
Another feature of Kir2 channel activation at low extracellular K+ is a prominent quasi-instantaneous phase of current activation (Fig. 8A; not shown for Kir2.2). Most of the quasi-instantaneous component of activation (Ishihara & Ehara, 2004) is not due to partial blocking of the Kir2 channels at the depolarized potentials (Vh=30 mV). It follows from Fig. 2C that at a 30 mV holding potential the (relative) current is only
0.05, while the inward current at 120 mV is more than 0.5 (out of scale), i.e. the potential contribution of unblocked current is about 10% or less. In some cases, 1 mM Spm was added to the pipette solution to minimize washout (very slow) of endogenous Spm. Inclusion of Spm decreases the outward currents at longer times thus minimizing the contribution of the unblocked fraction to the quasi-instantaneous component of activation even further. Specifically, for the representative Kir2.3 experiment in Fig. 8 the amplitude of the unblocked current at a 30 mV holding potential was only
45 pA while the quasi-instantaneous component at 120 mV is about 1000 pA, more than 50-fold difference (2% error). With the concentration of Spm used in this study, more than 95% of Kir2.3 channels, and an even higher fraction of Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels, are blocked at 30 mV. This quasi-instantaneous phase was not diminished by including 10 mM EDTA in the patch pipette or by longer perfusion times, suggesting that it is not due to the presence of Mg2+ ions or low molecular weight PAs such as putrescine. At potentials 30 mV negative to the reversal potential (i.e. at 105 mV), the instantaneous component accounted for 3050% of the total current amplitude in all Kir2 channels.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we have carried out a detailed analysis of Spm-induced steady-state rectification and kinetics of activation in three Kir2 channels which are believed to underlie cardiac IK1.
Differential properties of steady-state PA-induced rectification in Kir2 channels
Our initial experiments focused on the rectification profile of Kir2 channels negative to EK in the presence of high extracellular K+ and high concentration of Spm. It has been shown that in Kir2.1 and Kir2.3 channels block by Spm under these conditions is characterized by two distinct components, steep (component 0) and shallow (component 1) (Lopatin et al. 1995; Xie et al. 2002). The shallow and steep components are believed to correspond to the Spm molecule blocking at, or near, two distinct sites in the channel pore: a cluster of negatively charged residues in the cytoplasmic vestibule (E224, E299) (Yang et al. 1995; Kubo & Murata, 2001), and the rectification controller deep in the pore (D172) (Stanfield et al. 1994). All reported critical residues underlying the shallow binding site 1, including recently identified additional residues F254, D255, D259 and M301 (Pegan et al. 2005; Shin et al. 2005), are highly conserved in Kir2 channels, suggesting that they should all display similar binding properties for Spm at this shallow site. Yet, the data in Fig. 1 prove otherwise: Spm block at shallow site 1 is more potent in Kir2.2 and less potent in Kir2.3, implying that other not yet identified structures are involved in the formation of the shallow outer binding site. Much smaller, yet significant, differences are also observed in the steep component of rectification (V01/2, Z0). Notably (i) the effective valency Z0 of Spm block is highest in Kir2.2 channels, and (ii) the voltage of half-block V01/2 in Kir2.3 channels is shifted to negative potentials by 12 mV compared to that in Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels. The latter property is also confirmed by data in Fig. 3D and F and Table 2 summarizing the results obtained at a lower Spm concentration.
To better characterize the outward currents at potentials positive to EK we measured Kir2 currents in outside-out patches at lower concentrations of Spm. One of the most important findings of this study was that all Kir2 channels, including Kir2.3, displayed a classical crossover effect originating from a clear region of negative slope conductance, as well as an increase of the peak outward current upon an increase in extracellular K+. The crossover effect is a hallmark of classical strong inward rectifier channels (Noble, 1965), and has also been observed in cloned Kir2.1 channels (Ishihara, 1997). A controversy surrounds Kir2.3 channels, which are believed to contribute to the atrial inward rectifier current IK1 in several species (Melnyk et al. 2002; Dhamoon et al. 2004). The prominent feature of atrial IK1 is a small, or nearly absent, region of negative slope conductance. A recent study by Dhamoon et al. (2004) has addressed this issue by comparing the rectification properties of atrial IK1 and that of Kir2 channels. The authors utilized whole-cell patch-clamp recordings to observe outward currents in cultured cells expressing different Kir2 channels and found that the rectification profile of Kir2.3 channels was similar to that of sheep atrial IK1. Specifically, the authors found that Kir2.3 channels do not rectify completely and do not display a crossover effect upon an increase in extracellular K+. While the weak rectification may be well explained by the presence of unknown endogenous factors important for physiological functioning of Kir2 channels, we first wanted to assess the properties of Kir2 channels in a more controlled environment. In this study, we attempted to overcome some limitations and uncertainties of whole-cell recordings by (i) using an outside-out configuration to achieve complete control over ionic composition on both sides of the membrane, (ii) boosting channel expression by adding 5 mM sodium butyrate during channel expression, and (iii) using YFP-tagged Kir2.3 channels to identify highly expressing cells. C-terminus YFP or GFP attachments to Kir2 channels do not affect rectification properties in any significant way in all settings tested so far (see footnote to Table 1). The above improvements allowed us to obtain Kir2.3 current densities reaching a few hundred picoamps at 100 mV, at 5.4 mM extracellular K+, in outside-out patches, compared with similar current amplitudes recorded from the whole cell in the study by Dhamoon et al. (2004).
Further quantification of outward Kir2 currents revealed a number of important differences and similarities between different channel isoforms. Qualitatively, at low (physiological) levels of Spm, all Kir2 channels displayed two components of block, characterized by corresponding effective valencies (Z0, Z2), and corresponding voltages for half-block (V01/2, V21/2). The properties of shallow component 2 (V21/2 and Z2 in this study) were recently addressed in Kir2.1 channels (Guo & Lu, 2000; Ishihara & Ehara, 2004; Yan & Ishihara, 2005), but the exact mechanisms underlying the phenomenon remain controversial. For example, Guo & Lu (2000) provided evidence that the two components of PA block correspond to different protonation states of PAs. Ishihara & Ehara (2004) argue instead that Kir2.1 channels exist as two populations with different sensitivities to PAs. Quantitative analysis in this study shows that the properties of both steep and shallow components are significantly different between Kir2 channels. Kir2.3 channels are at the far end of the distribution, displaying the largest separation voltages between the steep component and shallow component 2, d2,0=V21/2V01/2. Taken together with the lowest effective valency Z2 of shallow component 2 (Table 2), the latter leads to an unusual pattern of outward currents (Fig. 3C), quite different from that in Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 channels. Kir2.2 channels, on the contrary, display the smallest separation between the two components, as well as the highest effective valency for the steep component Z0. On the other hand, the relative amplitude of shallow component 2 was similar in all channels: 11%, 13% and 11% for Kir2.1, Kir2.2 and Kir2.3, respectively, similar to that reported by Ishihara & Ehara (2004) in Kir2.1 channels.
Another finding important for the further understanding of the mechanism underlying modal block by Spm is that both the shallow (component 2) and the steep (0) components displayed a nearly identical dependence on extracellular K+ (Lopatin & Nichols, 1996b) (Fig. 3E and F), with corresponding voltages for half-block being directly proportional to Erev with a slope factor of
1.0 (Table 2).
It is also noteworthy to mention several other intriguing relationships between the parameters of rectification and/or conduction in different Kir2 channels. For example, the separation voltages between the two shallow components 1 and 2, and the steep component are directly proportional to the slope factor
1.0 (Fig. 9B). Since the V01/2 voltages for different Kir2 channels are nearly the same, the other interpretation of the above data would lead to the following relation: V21/2V11/2= constant. This relationship is not unique for any specific [Spm]. Since in all Kir2 channels both V21/2 and V11/2 display a similar dependence on [Spm] (Fig. 9A), the above relationship holds at any combination of [Spm] used to estimate V21/2 and V11/2 potentials (as observed in Fig. 9B). Surprisingly, the two components of block were never considered to be related. Component 1 is observed at high [Spm] and commonly assigned to block (Yang et al. 1995; Kubo & Murata, 2001) or a charge screening (Xie et al. 2002) at the E224/E299 cluster (Fig. 5). Component 2 is observed at low [Spm], and explained either via the block by partially de-protonated Spm (Guo & Lu, 2000), or by the existence of two populations of channels (or two modes of a channel) with low and high sensitivity to Spm (Ishihara & Ehara, 2004). The effective valencies of block for the two shallow components are different because these parameters are estimated in different conditions (Spm concentration and membrane potential), but the above nearly direct relationship between V21/2 and V11/2 is the strong experimental evidence that both components are the result of block at a common site. There is little doubt that the E224/E299 cluster contributes to component 1, while there is no solid evidence for any of the two different mechanisms mentioned above for component 2. Therefore, even though V11/2 and V21/2 voltages describe seemingly different properties of Kir2 channels obtained under quite different experimental conditions, the data strongly argue that both shallow components reflect the block at or near the E224/E299 cluster of negatively charged residues. To gain further support for this hypothesis we carried out an analysis of the relationship between the two components of block in a number of Kir2.1 mutants, including E224G and E299S substitutions. Charge neutralization at indicated positions leads to the most dramatic changes in rectification compared to other mutations. Specifically, in E224G and E299S channels, component 1 can no longer be reliably measured even at 300 µM Spm, and instead, a prominent component 2 with highly positive V21/2 (Table 3) is now clearly observed (Fig. 6B). Another striking result is that the steep component 0 is virtually unaffected in E299S, and probably not changed in the E224G mutant if one assumes underestimation of V01/2 due to experimental limitations. Another support for the tight relationship between components 1 and 2 comes from F254A mutant (Fig. 5): a milder, zero charge, mutation leads to a significant (
20 mV) shift in V21/2 (compared to wild-type Kir2.1; Fig. 6C), as well as for a significant reduction of block at hyperpolarized potentials (shallow component 1) but no significant change in the steep component 0 (Fig. 6B).
We have also attempted to expand the search for residues involved in the shallow component of rectification by testing two previously undescribed mutations near the narrow part of the pore. S256 in Kir2.1 is not conserved in other members of the subfamily and we thought that this residue might underlie at least some differences between Kir2 channels (Fig. 5). We hypothesized that S256I and S256K mutations would, respectively, reduce and increase Spm block at hyperpolarized potentials (i.e. to convert Kir2.1 channels into Kir2.3 and Kir2.2). The S256I mutation indeed caused a small (although not significant) shift of both V11/2, and V21/2 in a depolarized direction. Nevertheless, the S256K mutation did not support the above hypothesis. Similar to the S256I mutation it led to a relief of block at negative potentials but with no change in the V21/2 shallow component 2 (Fig. 6). Thus, although most of the evidence points to a strong relationship between components 1 and 2, the above data indicate that some regions of the shallow site may contribute differently to components 1 and 2 of block.
A number of other experimental studies also strongly support the idea that the same cluster of negatively charged residues is an essential regulator of the pore conductance (Kubo & Murata, 2001; Xie et al. 2002; Chang et al. 2005). Charge neutralization at the indicated sites leads to a reduced single-channel conductance and concurrent reduction of shallow component 1 of rectification. Figure 9C shows that in Kir2 channels, single-channel conductance is directly proportional to the voltage of half-block for shallow component 1 (and also component 2) V11/2, with a coefficient of proportionality k close to one. It is plausible that the above relation is not coincidental, and that a differential electronegativity at the shallow sites in different Kir channels underlies the Vi1/2 of the shallow components and single-channel conductance as well. The data in this study show that although well-characterized residues E224 and E299 are important elements of the shallow site, not all the data can be explained solely by their effect. In line with this, Pegan et al. (2005) have recently shown that an additional di-aspartate cluster D255/D259 in the cytoplasmic vestibule of Kir2.1 channels is also involved in rectification. Further studies will be necessary to understand the contribution of this cluster to shallow components 1 and 2. Since the latter residues are also conserved in all Kir2 channels, our data and the above hypothesis would lead to a conclusion that there are even more, yet unidentified, residues which contribute to differential PA sensitivity in Kir2 channels.
Kinetic properties of activation in Kir2 channels
Although the data pointing to the unusually slow activation kinetics of Kir2.3 channels can be traced to early literature on PA-induced rectification (Lopatin et al. 1995; Lopatin & Nichols, 1996b), it is only recently that attention has begun to shift to this phenomenon in an attempt to employ specific properties of Kir2.3 channels in characterizing the underlying molecular correlates of the cardiac current IK1. Recently, Yan et al. (2005) have compared the whole-cell activation kinetics of Kir2 channels exposed to physiological extracellular K+. The authors found that the time constants of the Kir2.3 channel activation were
10-fold greater than those of Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 which activated at similar rates (with Kir2.2 being approximately twice faster). Our results (Fig. 7) are in qualitative agreement with the data by Yan et al. (2005), although some quantitative, not principal, differences exist.
A novel property of Kir2 channel activation which has recently been brought to attention by Ishihara & Ehara (2004) is the presence of a so-called pseudo-instantaneous phase followed by a characteristic monoexponential current increase. A similar phenomenon has been observed in early studies of inward rectification in native classical strong inward rectifier channels of starfish eggs (Hagiwara et al. 1976) and frog skeletal muscles (Leech & Stanfield, 1981), as well as in original cell-attached recordings of cloned Kir2.3 channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes (Lopatin et al. 1995). While in early classical studies the origin of the pseudo-instantaneous component could be explained, at least partially, by the fact that the holding potential was set to the resting membrane potential (at which not all Kir channels are blocked), or by the presence of Mg2+ ions and low molecular weight polyamines (putrescine, which unblocks nearly instantaneously), the instantaneous activation reported by Ishihara & Ehara (2004) represents a truly novel phenomenon. In the study mentioned above, the instantaneous activation was observed in Kir2.1 channels at a high concentration of extracellular K+ (
0 mV reversal potential), with far depolarized holding potentials, where the block is nearly 100% complete, and in the presence of Spm only. The relative amplitude of the instantaneous component was shown to be rather small (
10% in the presence of Spm) and corresponded to the proportion of channels in a low affinity mode (equivalent to a fraction of the shallow component 2 in this study).
In our study, the instantaneous phase was hardly resolvable in all Kir2 channels in inside-out patches exposed to high extracellular K+ (Fig. 7), but became more evident in whole-cell recordings when the membrane was exposed to low extracellular K+ (Fig. 8A). The relative amplitude of the instantaneous component was about
3050% in both Kir2.1 and Kir2.3, significantly greater than that estimated by Ishihara & Ehara (2004) for Kir2.1 channels at high K+, and also significantly greater than
1013% found for shallow component 2 in outside-out patches. The discrepancy between our data and that of Ishihara & Ehara (2004) is furthered by the seemingly absent instantaneous component in Kir2.1 channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes (Shin & Lu, 2005). The exact mechanistic understanding of this phenomenon remains unclear, and will therefore have to be addressed by further studies.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dhamoon AS & Jalife J (2005). The inward rectifier current (IK1) controls cardiac excitability and is involved in arrhythmogenesis. Heart Rhythm 2, 316324.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dhamoon AS, Pandit SV, Sarmast F, Parisian KR, Guha P, Li Y, Bagwe S, Taffet SM & Anumonwo JM (2004). Unique Kir2.x properties determine regional and species differences in the cardiac inward rectifier K+ current. Circ Res 94, 13321339.
Fakler B, Brandle U, Glowatzki E, Weidemann S, Zenner HP & Ruppersberg JP (1995). Strong voltage-dependent inward rectification of inward rectifier K+ channels is caused by intracellular spermine. Cell 80, 149154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ficker E, Taglialatela M, Wible BA, Henley CM & Brown AM (1994). Spermine and spermidine as gating molecules for inward rectifier K+ channels. Science 266, 10681072.
Guo D & Lu Z (2000). Mechanism of IRK1 channel block by intracellular polyamines. J Gen Physiol 115, 799814.
Guo D & Lu Z (2002). IRK1 inward rectifier K+ channels exhibit no intrinsic rectification. J Gen Physiol 120, 539551.
Guo D, Ramu Y, Klem AM & Lu Z (2003). Mechanism of rectification in inward-rectifier K+ channels. J Gen Physiol 121, 261275.
Hagiwara S, Miyazaki S & Rosenthal NP (1976). Potassium current and the effect of cesium on this current during anomalous rectification of the egg cell membrane of a starfish. J Gen Physiol 67, 621638.
Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B & Sigworth FJ (1981). Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 391, 85100.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ishihara K (1997). Time-dependent outward currents through the inward rectifier potassium channel IRK1. The role of weak blocking molecules. J Gen Physiol 109, 229243.
Ishihara K & Ehara T (2004). Two modes of polyamine block regulating the cardiac inward rectifier K+ current IK1 as revealed by the study of Kir2.1 channel. J Physiol 556, 6178.