|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received October 4, 2001
Accepted after revision January 23, 2002
1 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University , Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
2 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Ohmori{at}nbiol.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Coincidence detection at the nucleus laminaris (NL) of a chicken was improved between embryos (embryonic days (E) 16 and 17) and chicks (postnatal days (P) 2-7) in slice preparations. Electrical stimuli were applied bilaterally to the projection fibres to the NL at various intervals. The response window corresponding to the temporal separation of electrical stimuli that resulted in half-maximal firing probability was adopted as the measure of coincidence detection, and was narrower in chicks (1.4 ms) than in embryos (3.9 ms). Between these two ages, the membrane time constant of NL neurons was reduced from 18.4 to 3.2 ms and the membrane conductance was increased 5-fold, while no difference was measured in the input capacitance. Evoked EPSCs decayed slightly faster in chicks, while the size and the time course of miniature EPSCs were unchanged. Action potentials had lower thresholds and larger after-hyperpolarization in chicks than in embryos. Dendrotoxin-I depolarized cells and increased their input resistance significantly at both ages, eliminated the after-hyperpolarization, and delayed the decay phase of action potentials, indicative of the expression of low-threshold K+ channels. Cs+ hyperpolarized the cells, increased the input resistance and eliminated sags during hyperpolarization at both ages, while the hyperpolarization sag was affected by neither Ba2+ nor TEA. These data indicate the expression of hyperpolarization-activated cation channels. Between these two ages, the maximum conductance of low-threshold K+ channels increased 4-fold to about 16 nS, and hyperpolarization-activated channels increased 6-fold to about 10 nS. Improvement of coincidence detection correlated with the acceleration of the EPSP time course as a result of the increase of these conductances.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X.-J. Cao, S. Shatadal, and D. Oertel Voltage-Sensitive Conductances of Bushy Cells of the Mammalian Ventral Cochlear Nucleus J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 3961 - 3975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yamada, H. Kuba, T. M. Ishii, and H. Ohmori Hyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation Channels Regulate Auditory Coincidence Detection in Nucleus Laminaris of the Chick J. Neurosci., September 28, 2005; 25(39): 8867 - 8877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Scott, P. J. Mathews, and N. L. Golding Posthearing Developmental Refinement of Temporal Processing in Principal Neurons of the Medial Superior Olive J. Neurosci., August 31, 2005; 25(35): 7887 - 7895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. MacLeod and C. E. Carr Synaptic Physiology in the Cochlear Nucleus Angularis of the Chick J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2520 - 2529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kuba, R. Yamada, I. Fukui, and H. Ohmori Tonotopic Specialization of Auditory Coincidence Detection in Nucleus Laminaris of the Chick J. Neurosci., February 23, 2005; 25(8): 1924 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Svirskis, V. Kotak, D. H. Sanes, and J. Rinzel Sodium Along With Low-Threshold Potassium Currents Enhance Coincidence Detection of Subthreshold Noisy Signals in MSO Neurons J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2465 - 2473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cathala, S. Brickley, S. Cull-Candy, and M. Farrant Maturation of EPSCs and Intrinsic Membrane Properties Enhances Precision at a Cerebellar Synapse J. Neurosci., July 9, 2003; 23(14): 6074 - 6085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sato and Y. Momose-Sato Optical Detection of Developmental Origin of Synaptic Function in the Embryonic Chick Vestibulocochlear Nuclei J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3215 - 3224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |