J Physiol Editor in Chief
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on March 1, 2002.
Copyright © 2002 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
540/2/607    most recent
2001.013420v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hood, A.S.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hood, A.S.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, J. D.

Received October 18, 2001
Accepted after revision January 18, 2002

The dependence of binocular contrast sensitivities on binocular single vision in normal and amblyopic human subjects

A.S. Hood1 and J. D. Morrison1*

1 West Medical Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jdm1u{at}udcf.gla.ac.uk.

We have measured monocular and binocular contrast sensitivities in response to medium to high spatial frequencies of vertical sinusoidal grating patterns in normal subjects, anisometropic amblyopes, strabismic amblyopes and non-amblyopic esotropes. On binocular viewing, contrast sensitivities were slightly but significantly increased in normal subjects, markedly increased in anisometropes and esotropes with anomalous binocular single vision (BSV) and significantly reduced in esotropes and exotropes without BSV. Application of a prismatic correction to the strabismic eye in order to achieve bifoveal stimulation resulted in a significant reduction in contrast sensitivity in esotropes with and without anomalous BSV, in exotropes and in non-amblyopic esotropes. Control experiments in normal subjects with monocular viewing showed that degradative effects of the prism occurred only with high prism powers and at high spatial frequencies, thus establishing that the reduced contrast sensitivities were the consequence of bifoveal stimulation rather than optical degradation. Displacement of the image of the grating pattern by 2 deg in normal subjects and anisometropes by a dichoptic method to simulate a small angle esotropia had no effect on the contrast sensitivities recorded through the companion eye. By contrast, esotropes showed similar reductions in contrast sensitivity to those obtained with the prism experiments, confirming a fundamental difference between subjects with normal and abnormal ocular alignments. The results have thus established a suppressive action of the fovea of the amblyopic eye acting on the companion, non-amblyopic eye and indicate that correction of ocular misalignments in adult esotropes may be disadvantageous to binocular visual performance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. H. Baker, T. S. Meese, B. Mansouri, and R. F. Hess
Binocular Summation of Contrast Remains Intact in Strabismic Amblyopia
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 5332 - 5338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2002 The Physiological Society.