J Physiol Editor in Chief
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on December 20, 2002.
Copyright © 2002 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
547/2/581    most recent
2002.024950v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gandevia, S.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gandevia, S.C.

Received May 30, 2002
Accepted after revision November 17, 2002

External perturbation of the trunk in standing humans differentially activates components of the medial back muscles

G. Lorimer Moseley1, P. W. Hodges2*, and S.C. Gandevia3

1 Pain Management and Research Centre, University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney and Departments of Physiotherapy, University of Queensland and Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
2 Department of Physiotherapy, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Queensland, Australia
3 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.hodges{at}shrs.uq.edu.au.

During voluntary arm movements, the medial back muscles are differentially active. It is not known whether differential activity also occurs when the trunk is perturbed unpredictably, when the earliest responses are initiated by short-latency spinal mechanisms rather than voluntary commands. To assess this, in unpredictable and self-initiated conditions, a weight was dropped into a bucket that was held by the standing subject (n = 7). EMG activity was recorded from the deep (Deep MF), superficial (Sup MF) and lateral (Lat MF) lumbar multifidus, the thoracic erector spinae (ES) and the biceps brachii. With unpredictable perturbations, EMG activity was first noted in the biceps brachii, then the thoracic ES, followed synchronously in the components of the multifidus. During self-initiated perturbations, background EMG in the Deep MF increased two- to threefold, and the latency of the loading response decreased in six out of the seven subjects. In Sup MF and Lat MF, this increase in background EMG was not observed, and the latency of the loading response was increased. Short-latency reflex mechanisms do not cause differential action of the medial back muscles when the trunk is loaded. However, during voluntary tasks the central nervous system exerts a 'tuned response', which involves discrete activity in the deep and superficial components of the medial lumbar muscles in a way that varies according to the biomechanical action of the muscle component.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2002 The Physiological Society.