J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on August 16, 2002.
Copyright © 2002 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
543/3/947    most recent
2002.026369v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neal, C.R.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Neal, C.R.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D.

Received June 14, 2002
Accepted after revision July 4, 2002

Measurement of hydraulic conductivity of single perfused Rana mesenteric microvessels between periods of controlled shear stress

C.R. Neal1 and D. Bates2*

1 Microvascular Research Laboratories, Department of Physiology, Preclinical Veterinary School, Southwell Street, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
2 Microvascular Research Laboratories Department of Physiology, Preclinical Veterinary School, Southwell Street, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dave.bates{at}bris.ac.uk.

A new method for the determination of hydraulic conductivity in individually perfused microvessels in vivo is described. A vessel is cannulated at both ends with glass micropipettes and the fluid filtration rate across the vessel wall measured from the velocities of red cells when the pressure in the micropipettes is balanced. Hydraulic conductivity measured using this double-cannulation method (2.6 (± 0.9) x 10-7 cm s-1 cmH2O-1) was not significantly different from that measured using a previously described technique in the same vessel (2.4 (± 0.9) x 10-7 cm s-1 cmH2O-1 using the Landis-Michel method). Shear stress on the vessel wall was controlled by changing the difference between the inflow and outflow pressures during periods of perfusion. The volume flow through the vessel, calculated from red cell velocity either in the vessel or in the pipette, was linearly proportional to this pressure difference. Higher flow rates could only be calculated from red cell velocities in the micropipette. There was no relationship between the imposed shear stress and intervening measurements of hydraulic conductivity (r = 0.029). This novel technique has advantages over the Landis-Michel method, which include the control of outflow resistance, the measurement of shear stress under conditions of controlled pressure, the elimination of compression damage to the vessel (since vessel occlusion is not necessary) and assessment of hydraulic conductivity over the same length of vessel throughout the experiment. The measurement of solute concentrations by indwelling micropipette electrodes and the collection of perfusate for analysis are other possibilities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. H. Wu
Endothelial focal adhesions and barrier function
J. Physiol., December 1, 2005; 569(2): 359 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M.-h. Kim, N. R. Harris, and J. M. Tarbell
Regulation of hydraulic conductivity in response to sustained changes in pressure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): H2551 - H2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M.-h. Kim, N. R. Harris, and J. M. Tarbell
Regulation of capillary hydraulic conductivity in response to an acute change in shear
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): H2126 - H2135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2002 The Physiological Society.