J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on June 13, 2003.
Copyright © 2003 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
550/3/933    most recent
2003.042606v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zoghi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nordstrom, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zoghi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nordstrom, M. A.

Received March 6, 2003
Accepted after revision May 1, 2003

Differential modulation of intracortical inhibition in human motor cortex during selective activation of an intrinsic hand muscle

Maryam Zoghi1, Sophie L. Pearce1, and M. A. Nordstrom2*

1 Department of Physiology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
2 Department of Physiology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: michael.nordstrom{at}adelaide.edu.au.

Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to assess the effectiveness of intracortical inhibition (ICI) acting on corticospinal neurons controlling three intrinsic hand muscles in humans. We hypothesised that the suppression of ICI with selective activation of a muscle would be restricted to corticospinal neurons controlling the muscle targeted for activation. Surface EMG was recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles of the left hand. Subjects were tested at rest and during weak selective activation of APB or ADM, while they attempted to keep the other muscles relaxed using visual feedback. Paired-pulse TMS was applied with a circular coil oriented to produce antero-posterior (AP) current flow in the right motor cortex (to preferentially evoke I3 waves in corticospinal neurons) and with postero-anterior (PA) currents (to preferentially evoke I1 waves). Paired-pulse TMS was less effective in suppressing the muscle evoked potential (MEP) when the muscle was targeted for selective activation, with both AP and PA stimulation. The mechanism for this includes effects on late I waves, as it was evident with a weak AP test TMS pulse that elicited negligible I1 waves in corticospinal neurons. ICI circuits activated by TMS, which exert their effects on late I waves but do not affect I1 waves, are strongly implicated in this modulation. With AP stimulation, paired-pulse inhibition was not significantly altered for corticospinal neurons controlling other muscles of the same hand which were required to be inactive during the selective activation task. This differential modulation was not seen with PA stimulation, which preferentially activates I1 waves and evokes a MEP that is less influenced by ICI. The observations with AP stimulation suggest that selective activation of a hand muscle is accompanied by a selective suppression of ICI effects on the corticospinal neurons controlling that muscle. The pattern of differential modulation of ICI effectiveness with voluntary activation suggests that the ICI circuits assist the corticospinal system in producing fractionated activity of intrinsic hand muscles.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. Ortu, F. Deriu, A. Suppa, E. Tolu, and J. C. Rothwell
Effects of volitional contraction on intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the human motor cortex
J. Physiol., November 1, 2008; 586(21): 5147 - 5159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
J. Duque, N. Murase, P. Celnik, F. Hummel, M. Harris-Love, R. Mazzocchio, E. Olivier, and L. G. Cohen
Intermanual Differences in Movement-related Interhemispheric Inhibition.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2007; 19(2): 204 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. Duchateau, J. G. Semmler, and R. M. Enoka
Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2006; 101(6): 1766 - 1775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
O. Soto, J. Valls-Sole, P. Shanahan, and J. Rothwell
Reduction of Intracortical Inhibition in Soleus Muscle During Postural Activity
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1711 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. V. Sale and J. G. Semmler
Age-related differences in corticospinal control during functional isometric contractions in left and right hands
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1483 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. Buccolieri, G. Abbruzzese, and J. C. Rothwell
Relaxation from a voluntary contraction is preceded by increased excitability of motor cortical inhibitory circuits
J. Physiol., July 15, 2004; 558(2): 685 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. I. Garry, G. Kamen, and M. A. Nordstrom
Hemispheric Differences in the Relationship Between Corticomotor Excitability Changes Following a Fine-Motor Task and Motor Learning
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1570 - 1578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.