J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 562, Number 3, 707-724, February 1, 2005 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.069039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
562/3/707    most recent
jphysiol.2004.069039v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powers, R. K
Right arrow Articles by Binder, M. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Powers, R. K
Right arrow Articles by Binder, M. D

Contributions of the input signal and prior activation history to the discharge behaviour of rat motoneurones

R. K Powers1, Y Dai1, B. M Bell2, D. B Percival2 and M. D Binder1

1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine
2 Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

The principal computational operation of neurones is the transformation of synaptic inputs into spike train outputs. The probability of spike occurrence in neurones is determined by the time course and magnitude of the total current reaching the spike initiation zone. The features of this current that are most effective in evoking spikes can be determined by injecting a Gaussian current waveform into a neurone and using spike-triggered reverse correlation to calculate the average current trajectory (ACT) preceding spikes. The time course of this ACT (and the related first-order Wiener kernel) provides a general description of a neurone's response to dynamic stimuli. In many different neurones, the ACT is characterized by a shallow hyperpolarizing trough followed by a more rapid depolarizing peak immediately preceding the spike. The hyperpolarizing phase is thought to reflect an enhancement of excitability by partial removal of sodium inactivation. Alternatively, this feature could simply reflect the fact that interspike intervals that are longer than average can only occur when the current is lower than average toward the end of the interspike interval. Thus, the ACT calculated for the entire spike train displays an attenuated version of the hyperpolarizing trough associated with the long interspike intervals. This alternative explanation for the characteristic shape of the ACT implies that it depends upon the time since the previous spike, i.e. the ACT reflects both previous stimulus history and previous discharge history. The present study presents results based on recordings of noise-driven discharge in rat hypoglossal motoneurones that support this alternative explanation. First, we show that the hyperpolarizing trough is larger in ACTs calculated from spikes preceded by long interspike intervals, and minimal or absent in those based on short interspike intervals. Second, we show that the trough is present for ACTs calculated from the discharge of a threshold-crossing neurone model with a postspike afterhyperpolarization (AHP), but absent from those calculated from the discharge of a model without an AHP. We show that it is possible to represent noise-driven discharge using a two-component linear model that predicts discharge probability based on the sum of a feedback kernel and a stimulus kernel. The feedback kernel reflects the influence of prior discharge mediated by the AHP, and it increases in amplitude when AHP amplitude is increased by pharmacological manipulations. Finally, we show that the predictions of this model are virtually identical to those based on the first-order Wiener kernel. This suggests that the Wiener kernels derived from standard white-noise analysis of noise-driven discharge in neurones actually reflect the effects of both stimulus and discharge history.

(Received 27 May 2004; accepted after revision 16 November 2004; first published online 20 December 2004)
Corresponding author R. K. Powers: Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, USA. Email: rkpowers{at}u.washington.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. Kondgen, C. Geisler, S. Fusi, X.-J. Wang, H.-R. Luscher, and M. Giugliano
The Dynamical Response Properties of Neocortical Neurons to Temporally Modulated Noisy Inputs In Vitro
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 2086 - 2097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
S. Hong, B. Aguera y Arcas, and A. L. Fairhall
Single neuron computation: from dynamical system to feature detector.
Neural Comput., December 1, 2007; 19(12): 3133 - 3172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. L. Fairhall, C. A. Burlingame, R. Narasimhan, R. A. Harris, J. L. Puchalla, and M. J. Berry II
Selectivity for Multiple Stimulus Features in Retinal Ganglion Cells
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2724 - 2738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. J. Slee, M. H. Higgs, A. L. Fairhall, and W. J. Spain
Two-Dimensional Time Coding in the Auditory Brainstem
J. Neurosci., October 26, 2005; 25(43): 9978 - 9988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 The Physiological Society.