J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 563, Number 3, 925-943, March 15, 2005 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.076422
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
563/3/925    most recent
jphysiol.2004.076422v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. D
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, J. A

Skeletal muscle pump versus respiratory muscle pump: modulation of venous return from the locomotor limb in humans

Jordan D Miller1, David F Pegelow1, Anthony J Jacques1 and Jerome A Dempsey1

1 University of Wisconsin-Madison, John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, 4245 Medical Sciences Center, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA

The vast majority of quantitative data examining the effects of breathing on venous return have been derived from anaesthetized or reduced animal preparations, making an extrapolation to an upright exercising human problematic due to the lack of a hydrostatic column and an absence of muscular contraction. Thus, this study is the first to quantitatively examine the effects of different breathing mechanics on venous return from the locomotor limbs both at rest and during calf contraction exercise in the semirecumbent human. When subjects inspired using predominantly their ribcage/accessory inspiratory muscles at rest (change in gastric pressure ({Delta}PGA) = <2 cmH2O, change in oesophageal pressure ({Delta}PES) = ~–6 cmH2O; inspiratory time/total breath time (TI/TTOT) = 0.5), a slight facilitation of femoral venous return was observed during inspiration (65% of all flow occurred during inspiration), with a slight reduction in femoral venous return during the ensuing expiratory phase of the breath. However, when subjects inspired using a predominantly diaphragmatic breath at rest ({Delta}PGA = > 5 cmH2O, {Delta}PES = ~–6 cmH2O; TI/TTOT = 0.5), femoral venous return was markedly impeded (net retrograde flow of 11%) and significantly lower than that observed during ribcage breathing conditions (P < 0.01). During the ensuing expiratory phase of a diaphragmatic breath, there was a large resurgence of femoral venous blood flow. The pattern of modulation during ribcage and diaphragmatic breathing persisted during both mild (peak calf force = 7 kg) and moderate (peak calf force = 11 kg) levels of calf contraction. Despite the significant within-breath modulation of femoral venous return by breathing, net blood flow in the steady state was not altered by the breathing pattern followed by the subjects. Though popliteal blood flow appeared to be modulated by respiration at rest, this pattern was absent during mild calf contraction where popliteal outflow was phasic with the concentric phase of calf contraction. We conclude that respiratory muscle pressure production is the predominant factor modulating venous return from the locomotor limb both at rest and during calf contraction even when the veins of the lower limb are distended due to the presence of a physiologic hydrostatic column.

(Received 29 September 2004; accepted after revision 12 January 2005; first published online 13 January 2005)
Corresponding author J. D. Miller: University of Wisconsin, John Rankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, 4245 Medical Sciences Center, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Email: jordanmiller{at}wisc.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. D. Thijs, J. G. van den Aardweg, R. H. A. M. Reijntjes, J. G. van Dijk, and J. J. van Lieshout
Contrasting effects of isocapnic and hypocapnic hyperventilation on orthostatic circulatory control
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1069 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. P. Downie, S. M. Raynor, D. N. Firmin, N. B. Wood, S. A. Thom, A. D. Hughes, K. H. Parker, J. H. N. Wolfe, and X. Y. Xu
Effects of elastic compression stockings on wall shear stress in deep and superficial veins of the calf
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H2112 - H2120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. M. Romer and M. I. Polkey
Exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue: implications for performance
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 879 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Goodman, M. R. Freeman, and L. S. Goodman
Left ventricular function during arm exercise: influence of leg cycling and lower body positive pressure
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 904 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Miller, C. A. Smith, S. J. Hemauer, and J. A. Dempsey
The effects of inspiratory intrathoracic pressure production on the cardiovascular response to submaximal exercise in health and chronic heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H580 - H592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. V. Pancheva, V. S. Panchev, A. V. Suvandjieva, C. T. P. Krediet, J. J. van Lieshout, and W. Wieling
Improved orthostatic tolerance by leg crossing and muscle tensing: indisputable evidence for the arteriovenous pump existence
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1271 - 1272.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Miller, S. J. Hemauer, C. A. Smith, M. K. Stickland, and J. A. Dempsey
Expiratory threshold loading impairs cardiovascular function in health and chronic heart failure during submaximal exercise
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 213 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Miller, D. F. Pegelow, A. J. Jacques, and J. A. Dempsey
Effects of augmented respiratory muscle pressure production on locomotor limb venous return during calf contraction exercise
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 1802 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 The Physiological Society.