| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Neurophysiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany
In this study, we tested the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) protocol – a conditioning stimulus (CS) given at variable intervals prior to a test stimulus (TS) – for visually evoked single-unit activity in cat primary visual cortex. We defined the TS as being supra-threshold when it caused a significant increase or decrease in the visually evoked activity. By systematically varying the interstimulus interval (ISI) between 2 and 30 ms and the strength of CS within the range 15–130% of TS, we found a clear dependence of the ppTMS effect on CS strength but little relation to ISI. The CS effect was strongest with an ISI of 3 ms and steadily declined for longer ISIs. A switch from enhancement of intracortical inhibition at short ISIs (2–5 ms, SICI) to intracortical facilitation (ICF) at longer ISIs (7–30 ms), as demonstrated for human motor cortex, was not evident. Whether the CS caused facilitation or suppression of the TS effect mainly depended on the strength of CS and the polarity of the TS effect: within a range of 60–130% a positive correlation between ppTMS and TS effect was evident, resulting in a stronger facilitation if the TS caused facilitation of visual activity, and more suppression if the TS was suppressive by itself. The correlation inverted when CS was reduced to 15–30%. The ppTMS effect was not simply the sum of the CS and TS effect, it was much smaller at weak CS strength (15–50%) but stronger than the sum of CS and TS effects at CS strength 60–100%. Differences in the physiological state between sensory and motor cortices and the interactions of paired synaptic inputs are discussed as possible reasons for the partly different effects of ppTMS in cat visual cortex and human motor cortex.
(Received 3 March 2005;
accepted after revision 19 May 2005;
first published online 26 May 2005)
Corresponding author K. Funke: Department of Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany. Email: funke{at}neurop.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. de Labra, C. Rivadulla, K. Grieve, J. Marino, N. Espinosa, and J. Cudeiro Changes in Visual Responses in the Feline dLGN: Selective Thalamic Suppression Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of V1 Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1376 - 1385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Aydin-Abidin, V. Moliadze, U. T. Eysel, and K. Funke Effects of repetitive TMS on visually evoked potentials and EEG in the anaesthetized cat: dependence on stimulus frequency and train duration J. Physiol., July 15, 2006; 574(2): 443 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
