|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Spinal Cord Research Centre and Department of Physiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3E 3J7
2 Department of Physiology, Biophysics and Neuroscience, CINVESTAV del IPN, Mexico City, Mexico 07300
Reflex actions of muscle afferents in hindlimb flexor nerves were examined on ipsilateral motoneurone activity recorded in peripheral nerves during midbrain stimulation-evoked fictive locomotion and during fictive scratch in decerebrate cats. Trains of stimuli (1530 shocks at 200 Hz) were delivered during the flexion phase at intensities sufficient to activate both group I and II afferents (5 times threshold, T). In many preparations tibialis anterior (TA) nerve stimulation terminated ongoing flexion and reset the locomotor cycle to extension (19/31 experiments) while extensor digitorum longus (EDL) stimulation increased and prolonged the ongoing flexor phase activity (20/33 preparations). The effects of sartorius, iliopsoas and peroneus longus muscle afferent stimulation were qualitatively similar to those of EDL nerve. Resetting to extension was seen only with higher intensity stimulation (5T) while ongoing flexor activity was often enhanced at group I intensity (2T) stimulation. The effects of flexor nerve stimulation were qualitatively similar during fictive scratch. Reflex reversals were consistently observed in some fictive locomotor preparations. In those cases, EDL stimulation produced a resetting to extension and TA stimulation prolonged the ongoing flexion phase. Occasionally reflex reversals occurred spontaneously during only one of several stimulus presentations. The variable and opposite actions of flexor afferents on the locomotor step cycle indicate the existence of parallel spinal reflex pathways. A hypothetical organization of reflex pathways from flexor muscle afferents to the spinal pattern generator networks with competing actions of group I and group II afferents on the flexor and extensor portions of this central circuitry is proposed.
(Received 28 July 2005;
accepted after revision 31 August 2005;
first published online 1 September 2005)
Corresponding author D. A. McCrea: Spinal Cord Research Centre and Department of Physiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3E 3J7. Email: dave{at}scrc.umanitoba.ca
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter Individual Premotor Drive Pulses, Not Time-Varying Synergies, Are the Units of Adjustment for Limb Trajectories Constructed in Spinal Cord J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2409 - 2425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Barthelemy, H. Leblond, and S. Rossignol Characteristics and Mechanisms of Locomotion Induced by Intraspinal Microstimulation and Dorsal Root Stimulation in Spinal Cats J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 1986 - 2000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Musselman and J. F. Yang Loading the Limb During Rhythmic Leg Movements Lengthens the Duration of Both Flexion and Extension in Human Infants J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1247 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Rybak, N. A. Shevtsova, M. Lafreniere-Roula, and D. A. McCrea Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from deletions during fictive locomotion J. Physiol., December 1, 2006; 577(2): 617 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Rybak, K. Stecina, N. A. Shevtsova, and D. A. McCrea Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from the effects of afferent stimulation J. Physiol., December 1, 2006; 577(2): 641 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cabaj, K. Stecina, and E. Jankowska Same Spinal Interneurons Mediate Reflex Actions of Group Ib and Group II Afferents and Crossed Reticulospinal Actions J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3911 - 3922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |