HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 577/1/403    most recent jphysiol.2006.116772v1 Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lakie, M. Articles by Loram, I. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lakie, M. Articles by Loram, I. D. Related Collections Integrative

¹ Applied Physiology Research Group, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
² Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager Campus, UK

Ten subjects balanced their own body or a mechanically equivalent unstable inverted pendulum by hand, through a compliant spring linkage. Their balancing process was always characterized by repeated small reciprocating hand movements. These bias adjustments were an observable sign of intermittent alterations in neural output. On average, the adjustments occurred at intervals of 400 ms. To generate appropriate stabilizing bias adjustments, sensory information about body or load movement is needed. Subjects used visual, vestibular or proprioceptive sensation alone and in combination to perform the tasks. We first ask, is the time between adjustments (bias duration) sensory specific? Vision is associated with slow responses. Other senses involved with balance are known to be faster. Our second question is; does bias duration depend on sensory abundance? An appropriate bias adjustment cannot occur until unplanned motion is unambiguously perceived (a sensory threshold). The addition of more sensory data should therefore expedite action, decreasing the mean bias adjustment duration. Statistical analysis showed that (1) the mean bias adjustment duration was remarkably independent of the sensory modality and (2) the addition of one or two sensory modalities made a small, but significant, decrease in the mean bias adjustment duration. Thus, a threshold effect can alter only a very minor part of the bias duration. The bias adjustment duration in manual balancing must reflect something more than visual sensation and perceptual thresholds; our suggestion is that it is a common central motor planning process. We predict that similar processes may be identified in the control of standing.

(Received 7 July 2006; accepted after revision 5 September 2006; first published online 9 September 2006)
Corresponding author M. Lakie: School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Email: m.d.lakie{at}bham.ac.uk

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. van der Kooij and E. de Vlugt Postural Responses Evoked by Platform Pertubations Are Dominated by Continuous Feedback J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 730 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. D. Loram, P. J. Gawthrop, and M. Lakie The frequency of human, manual adjustments in balancing an inverted pendulum is constrained by intrinsic physiological factors J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 417 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]