J Physiol Editor in Chief
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 579, Number 3, 637-642, March 15, 2007 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.123067
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
579/3/637    most recent
jphysiol.2006.123067v2
jphysiol.2006.123067v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dobkin, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dobkin, B. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Review articles

SYMPOSIUM REPORTS

Brain–computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation

Bruce H. Dobkin1

1 University of California Los Angeles, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) are a rehabilitation tool for tetraplegic patients that aim to improve quality of life by augmenting communication, control of the environment, and self-care. The neurobiology of both rehabilitation and BCI control depends upon learning to modify the efficacy of spared neural ensembles that represent movement, sensation and cognition through progressive practice with feedback and reward. To serve patients, BCI systems must become safe, reliable, cosmetically acceptable, quickly mastered with minimal ongoing technical support, and highly accurate even in the face of mental distractions and the uncontrolled environment beyond a laboratory. BCI technologies may raise ethical concerns if their availability affects the decisions of patients who become locked-in with brain stem stroke or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis to be sustained with ventilator support. If BCI technology becomes flexible and affordable, volitional control of cortical signals could be employed for the rehabilitation of motor and cognitive impairments in hemiplegic or paraplegic patients by offering on-line feedback about cortical activity associated with mental practice, motor intention, and other neural recruitment strategies during progressive task-oriented practice. Clinical trials with measures of quality of life will be necessary to demonstrate the value of near-term and future BCI applications.

(Received 17 October 2006; accepted after revision 8 November 2006; first published online 16 November 2006)
Corresponding author B. H. Dobkin: University of California Los Angeles, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Email: bdobkin{at}mednet.ucla.edu


This report was presented at The Journal of Physiology Symposium on Physiology of brain–computer interfaces, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 13 October 2006. It was commissioned by the Editorial Board and reflects the views of the authors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. A. Dimyan, B. H. Dobkin, and L. G. Cohen
Emerging Subspecialties: Neurorehabilitation: Training neurologists to retrain the brain
Neurology, April 15, 2008; 70(16): e52 - e54.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. G. Cohen and N. Birbaumer
The physiology of brain-computer interfaces
J. Physiol., March 15, 2007; 579(3): 570 - 570.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.