|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEUROSCIENCE |
Departments of
1 Ophthalmology
2 Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3 Biology Department, University of St Thomas, Houston, TX 77006, USA
4 Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02135, USA
AII amacrine cells (AIIACs) are crucial relay stations for rod-mediated signals in the mammalian retina and they receive synaptic inputs from depolarizing and hyperpolarizing bipolar cells (DBCs and HBCs) as well as from other amacrine cells. Using whole-cell voltage-clamp technique in conjunction with pharmacological tools, we found that the light-evoked current response of AIIACs in the mouse retina is almost completely mediated by two DBC synaptic inputs: a 6,7-dinitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX)-resistant component mediated by cone DBCs (DBCCs) through an electrical synapse, and a DNQX-sensitive component mediated by rod DBCs (DBCRs). This scheme is supported by AIIAC current responses recorded from two knockout mice. The dynamic range of the AIIAC light response in the Bhlhb4/ mouse (which lacks DBCRs) resembles that of the DNQX-resistant component, and that of the connexin36 (Cx36)/ mouse resembles the DNQX-sensitive component. By comparing the light responses of the DBCCs with the DNQX-resistant AIIAC component, and light responses of the DBCRs with the DNQX-sensitive AIIAC component, we obtained the inputoutput relations of the DBCC
AIIAC electrical synapse and the DBCR
AIIAC chemical synapse. Similar to other glutamatergic chemical synapses in the retina, the DBCR
AIIAC synapse is non-linear. Its highest voltage gain (approximately 5) is found near the dark membrane potential, and it saturates for presynaptic signals larger than 5.5 mV. The DBCC
AIIAC electrical synapse is approximately linear (voltage gain of 0.92), consistent with the linear junctional conductance found in retinal electrical synapses. Moreover, relative DBCR and DBCC contributions to the AIIAC response at various light intensity levels are determined.
(Received 8 September 2006;
accepted after revision 22 January 2007;
first published online 25 January 2007)
Corresponding author S. M. Wu: Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, NC-205, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Email: swu{at}bcm.tmc.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Cameron, L. Miao, R. Ruseckaite, M. J. Pianta, and T. D. Lamb Dark adaptation recovery of human rod bipolar cell response kinetics estimated from scotopic b-wave measurements J. Physiol., November 15, 2008; 586(22): 5419 - 5436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Manookin, D. L. Beaudoin, Z. R. Ernst, L. J. Flagel, and J. B. Demb Disinhibition Combines with Excitation to Extend the Operating Range of the OFF Visual Pathway in Daylight J. Neurosci., April 16, 2008; 28(16): 4136 - 4150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |