|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MOLECULAR AND GENOMIC |
1A52S in recombinant rat glycine receptors1 Department of Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Inherited defects in glycine receptors lead to hyperekplexia, or startle disease. A mutant mouse, spasmodic, that has a startle phenotype, has a point mutation (A52S) in the glycine receptor
1 subunit. This mutation reduces the sensitivity of the receptor to glycine, but the mechanism by which this occurs is not known. We investigated the properties of A52S recombinant receptors by cell-attached patch-clamp recording of single-channel currents elicited by 30–10000 µM glycine. We used heteromeric receptors, which resemble those found at adult inhibitory synapses. Activation mechanisms were fitted directly to single channel data using the HJCFIT method, which includes an exact correction for missed events. In common with wild-type receptors, only mechanisms with three binding sites and extra shut states could describe the observations. The most physically plausible of these, the flip mechanism, suggests that preopening isomerization to the flipped conformation that follows binding is less favoured in mutant than in wild-type receptors, and, especially, that the flipped conformation has a 100-fold lower affinity for glycine than in wild-type receptors. In contrast, the efficacy of the gating reaction was similar to that of wild-type heteromeric receptors. The reduction in affinity for the flipped conformation accounts for the reduction in apparent cooperativity seen in the mutant receptor (without having to postulate interaction between the binding sites) and it accounts for the increased EC50 for responses to glycine that is seen in mutant receptors. This mechanism also predicts accurately the faster decay of synaptic currents that is observed in spasmodic mice.
(Received 18 December 2006;
accepted after revision 21 February 2007;
first published online 1 March 2007)
Corresponding author Lucia G Sivilotti: Department of Pharmacology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Email: l.sivilotti{at}ucl.ac.uk
Related Article
J. Physiol. 2007 581: 3.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Keramidas and N. L. Harrison Agonist-dependent Single Channel Current and Gating in {alpha}4{beta}2{delta} and {alpha}1{beta}2{gamma}2S GABAA Receptors J. Gen. Physiol., January 28, 2008; 131(2): 163 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Zhang, Y. Cho, E. Lolis, and J. R. Howe Structural and Single-Channel Results Indicate That the Rates of Ligand Binding Domain Closing and Opening Directly Impact AMPA Receptor Gating J. Neurosci., January 23, 2008; 28(4): 932 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Steinbach A slip 'twixt the cup and the lip: a new way to impair function of transmitter-gated channels J. Physiol., May 15, 2007; 581(1): 3 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |