HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 583/3/1107    most recent jphysiol.2007.136192v1 Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reynolds, R. F. Articles by Day, B. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reynolds, R. F. Articles by Day, B. L. Related Collections Integrative

¹ Human Movement Group, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Insitute of Neurology, University College London, 8–11 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK

Reaction time to a visual event can be dramatically reduced if the visual stimulus is accompanied by a startling sound. The mechanism may involve a motor programme being stored and triggered early by the sound. However, in a choice reaction task the required response is not known in advance, and so cannot be stored. In this case startling sound does not usually speed up the reaction and may even be detrimental to performance. Here we show that the reaction time of a special type of visually evoked movement can be substantially reduced by startling sound, even though the movement requires choice. The task involved stepping onto an illuminated target that sometimes moved mid-step left or right, requiring a foot trajectory adjustment. These adjustments occur at much shorter latency than conventional visuomotor reaction tasks and are thought to involve subcortical brain areas. The presence of the sound, which carried no information, shortened the already fast mean response time of 134 ms by 20 ms. We attribute this to auditory–visual interaction since sound alone had no effect. Although we observed startle responses, the quickening effect was not contingent upon their presence. Given minimum motor and sensory conduction time, we estimate that the loud sound reduced the central visuomotor processing time by at least 30%.

(Received 10 May 2007; accepted after revision 13 July 2007; first published online 26 July 2007)
Corresponding author R. F. Reynolds: Human Movement Group, Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Insitute of Neurology, UCL, 8–11 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Email: r.reynolds{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Queralt, V. Weerdesteyn, H. J. R. van Duijnhoven, J. M. Castellote, J. Valls-Sole, and J. Duysens The effects of an auditory startle on obstacle avoidance during walking J. Physiol., September 15, 2008; 586(18): 4453 - 4463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]