J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 586, Number 1, 151-160, January 1, 2008 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142109
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
586/1/151    most recent
jphysiol.2007.142109v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgomaster, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gibala, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burgomaster, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gibala, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Skeletal Muscle and Exercise
Right arrowRelated Article

SPECIAL SECTION RELATED PAPERS

Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans

Kirsten A. Burgomaster1, Krista R. Howarth1, Stuart M. Phillips1, Mark Rakobowchuk1, Maureen J. MacDonald1, Sean L. McGee2 and Martin J. Gibala1

1 Exercise Metabolism Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1
2 Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3010

Low-volume ‘sprint’ interval training (SIT) stimulates rapid improvements in muscle oxidative capacity that are comparable to levels reached following traditional endurance training (ET) but no study has examined metabolic adaptations during exercise after these different training strategies. We hypothesized that SIT and ET would induce similar adaptations in markers of skeletal muscle carbohydrate (CHO) and lipid metabolism and metabolic control during exercise despite large differences in training volume and time commitment. Active but untrained subjects (23 ± 1 years) performed a constant-load cycling challenge (1 h at 65% of peak oxygen uptake Formula before and after 6 weeks of either SIT or ET (n = 5 men and 5 women per group). SIT consisted of four to six repeats of a 30 s ‘all out’ Wingate Test (mean power output ~500 W) with 4.5 min recovery between repeats, 3 days per week. ET consisted of 40–60 min of continuous cycling at a workload that elicited ~65% Formula (mean power output ~150 W) per day, 5 days per week. Weekly time commitment (~1.5 versus ~4.5 h) and total training volume (~225 versus ~2250 kJ week–1) were substantially lower in SIT versus ET. Despite these differences, both protocols induced similar increases (P < 0.05) in mitochondrial markers for skeletal muscle CHO (pyruvate dehydrogenase E1{alpha} protein content) and lipid oxidation (3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase maximal activity) and protein content of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} coactivator-1{alpha}. Glycogen and phosphocreatine utilization during exercise were reduced after training, and calculated rates of whole-body CHO and lipid oxidation were decreased and increased, respectively, with no differences between groups (all main effects, P < 0.05). Given the markedly lower training volume in the SIT group, these data suggest that high-intensity interval training is a time-efficient strategy to increase skeletal muscle oxidative capacity and induce specific metabolic adaptations during exercise that are comparable to traditional ET.

(Received 1 August 2007; accepted after revision 23 October 2007; first published online 8 November 2007)
Corresponding author M. J. Gibala: Exercise Metabolism Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1. Email: gibalam{at}mcmaster.ca


Related Article

Specificity of training adaptation: time for a rethink?
John A. Hawley
J. Physiol. 2008 586: 1-2. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. A. Hawley
Specificity of training adaptation: time for a rethink?
J. Physiol., January 1, 2008; 586(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 The Physiological Society.