J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Volume 586, Number 6, 1509-1517, March 15, 2008 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.150029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
586/6/1509    most recent
jphysiol.2007.150029v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cline, H.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cline, H.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Review articles
Right arrow Neuroscience

SYMPOSIUM REPORT

The regulation of dendritic arbor development and plasticity by glutamatergic synaptic input: a review of the synaptotrophic hypothesis

Hollis Cline1 and Kurt Haas2

1 Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbour, NY 11724, USA
2 Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

The synaptotropic hypothesis, which states that synaptic inputs control the elaboration of dendritic (and axonal) arbors was articulated by Vaughn in 1989. Today the role of synaptic inputs in controlling neuronal structural development remains an area of intense research activity. Several recent studies have applied modern molecular genetic, imaging and electrophysiological methods to this question and now provide strong evidence that maturation of excitatory synaptic inputs is required for the development of neuronal structure in the intact brain. Here we critically review data concerning the hypothesis with the expectation that understanding the circumstances when the data do and do not support the hypothesis will be most valuable. The synaptotrophic hypothesis contributes at both conceptual and mechanistic levels to our understanding of how relatively minor changes in levels or function of synaptic proteins may have profound effects on circuit development and plasticity.

(Received 25 December 2007; accepted after revision 10 January 2008; first published online 17 January 2008)
Corresponding author H. Cline: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbour, NY 11724, USA. Email: cline{at}cshl.edu


This report was presented at The Journal of Physiology Symposium on Synaptic Plasticity, San Diego, CA, USA, 2 November 2007. It was commissioned by the Editorial Board and reflects the views of the author.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. E. McKellar and C. J. Shatz
Synaptogenesis in Purified Cortical Subplate Neurons
Cereb Cortex, November 21, 2008; (2008) bhn194v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. J. McBain
New directions in synaptic and network plasticity - a move away from NMDA receptor mediated plasticity
J. Physiol., March 15, 2008; 586(6): 1473 - 1474.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 The Physiological Society.