J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on August 15, 2003.
Copyright © 2003 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
551/3/1005    most recent
jphysiol.2003.040196v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macefield, V. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wallin, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macefield, V. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wallin, B. G.

Received January 24, 2003
Accepted after revision June 11, 2003

Resting discharge of human muscle spindles is not modulated by increases in sympathetic drive

V. G. Macefield1*, Yrsa B. Sverrisdottir2, and B. Gunnar Wallin2

1 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Barker Street, Randwick NSW 2031, Australia
2 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vg.macefield{at}unsw.edu.au.

There is evidence in experimental animals that, in addition to receiving fusimotor drive, muscle spindles are subject to modulation by the sympathetic nervous system. We examined the validity of this idea in human subjects by recording from muscle spindles in the relaxed ankle and toe extensor muscles during a strong and sustained physiological activation of muscle sympathetic outflow. Unitary recordings were made from 20 primary and 17 secondary muscle spindle afferents via a tungsten microelectrode inserted percutaneously into the peroneal nerve in 10 awake, healthy subjects seated with the legs supported in the extended position. ECG, blood pressure, respiration and calf circumference were also recorded. The majority of the muscle spindles were spontaneously active at rest; a background discharge was induced in four silent spindles by vibrating the tendon. A sustained increase in muscle vasoconstrictor activity, an increase in calf volume and a fall in pulse pressure were produced by subjects performing a 30-40 s maximal inspiratory breath-hold. Despite this strong increase in muscle sympathetic outflow no significant changes occurred in the discharge of either primary or secondary muscle spindle afferents, measured as a change in mean frequency and variability over sequential 5 s epochs and compared with the preceding period of rest. Strong chemoreceptor-driven sympathetic bursts during sustained expiratory breath-holds also failed to modulate the firing of 14 spindle endings. We conclude that a sustained, physiological increase in muscle sympathetic activity causes no detectable change in muscle spindle firing, lending no support to the concept that the sympathetic nervous system can influence the sensitivity of human muscle spindles directly.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
I. Birznieks, A. R. Burton, and V. G. Macefield
The effects of experimental muscle and skin pain on the static stretch sensitivity of human muscle spindles in relaxed leg muscles
J. Physiol., June 1, 2008; 586(11): 2713 - 2723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. Hjortskov, J. Skotte, C. Hye-Knudsen, and N. Fallentin
Sympathetic outflow enhances the stretch reflex response in the relaxed soleus muscle in humans
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2005; 98(4): 1366 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.