J Physiol Editor in Chief
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on November 7, 2003.
Copyright © 2003 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
554/2/321    most recent
jphysiol.2003.046995v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desaphy, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Conte Camerino, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desaphy, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Conte Camerino, D.

Received May 12, 2003
Revised June 12, 2003
Accepted after revision November 4, 2003

Different flecainide sensitivity of hNaV1.4 channels and myotonic mutants explained by state-dependent block

Jean-Francois Desaphy1, Annamaria De Luca1, Maria Paola Didonna1, Alfred L. George2, and Diana Conte Camerino1*

1 University of Bari
2 Vanderbilt University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: conte{at}farmbiol.uniba.it.

Flecainide belonging to class IC antiarrhythmics was shown to improve myotonia caused by sodium channel mutations in situations where the class IB antiarrhythmic drug mexiletine was less efficient. Yet little is known about molecular interactions between flecainide and human skeletal muscle sodium (hNav1.4) channels. Whole-cell sodium currents (INa) were recorded in tsA201 cells expressing wild-type (WT) and mutant hNav1.4 channels (R1448C, paramyotonia congenita; G1306E, potassium-aggravated myotonia). At a holding potential (hp) of -120 mV, flecainide use-dependently blocked WT and G1306E INa equally but was more potent on R1448C channels. For WT, the extent of block depended on holding voltage more negative than the activation threshold, being greater at -90 mV as compared to -120 and -180 mV. This behaviour was exacerbated by the R1448C mutation since block at -120 mV was greater than that at -180 mV. Thus flecainide can bind to inactivated sodium channels in absence of channel opening. Nevertheless, all the channels showed the same closed- state affinity constant (KR ~ 480 µM) and the same inactivated-state affinity constant (KI ~ 18 µM). Simulations according to the modulated receptor hypothesis mimic the voltage-dependent block of WT and mutant channels by flecainide and mexiletine. All the results suggest similar blocking mechanisms for the two drugs. Yet, since flecainide exerts use-dependent block at lower frequency than mexiletine, it may exhibit greater benefit in all myotonic syndromes. Moreover, flecainide blocks hNav1.4 channel mutants with rightward shift of availability voltage-dependence more specifically than mexiletine, owing to a lower KR/KI ratio. This study offers a pharmacogenetic strategy to better address treatment in individual myotonic patients.


Key words: Channel blockade • Myotonia • Sodium channel







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.