J Physiol Editor in Chief
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on September 12, 2003.
Copyright © 2003 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
553/2/601    most recent
jphysiol.2003.048561v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rivadulla, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cudeiro, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rivadulla, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cudeiro, J.

Received June 4, 2003
Revised July 2, 2003
Accepted after revision September 8, 2003

Receptive field structure of burst and tonic firing in feline Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

Casto Rivadulla1, Luis M Martinez1, Kenneth L Grieve2, and Javier Cudeiro1*

1 University of Coruña
2 UMIST-Manchester

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jcud{at}udc.es.

There are two recognized modes of firing activity in thalamic cells, burst and tonic. A low threshold (LT) burst (referred to from now on as "burst") comprises a small number of high frequency action potentials riding the peak of a LT calcium spike which is preceded by a silent hyperpolarized state >50 msec. This is traditionally viewed as a sleep-like phenomenon, with a shift to tonic mode at wake-up. However, bursts have also been seen in the wake state and may be a significant feature for full activation of recipient cortical cells. Here we show that for visual stimulation of anaesthetized cats burst firing is restricted to a reduced area within the receptive field center of LGN cells. Consistently, the receptive field size of all the recorded neurons decreased in size proportionally to the percentage of spikes in burst versus tonic spikes, an effect that is further demonstrated with pharmacological manipulation. The role of this shrinkage may be distinct from that also seen in sleep-like states and we suggest that this is a mechanism which trades spatial resolution for security of information transfer.


Key words: Burst firing • Receptive field • Thalamus







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.