J Physiol Editor in Chief
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on October 31, 2003.
Copyright © 2003 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
554/2/417    most recent
jphysiol.2003.051250v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahroo, O.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahroo, O.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, T.

Received July 15, 2003
Revised September 16, 2003
Accepted after revision October 27, 2003

Recovery of the human photopic electroretinogram after bleaching exposures: estimation of pigment regeneration kinetics

Omar Mahroo1 and Trevor Lamb2*

1 University of Cambridge
2 Australian National University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: trevor.lamb{at}anu.edu.au.

We used a fibre electrode in the lower conjunctival sac to record the a-wave of the photopic electroretinogram elicited in response to dim red flashes, delivered in the presence of a rod-saturating blue background, before and after exposure of the eye to bright white illumination that bleached a significant fraction of cone photopigment. Responses were recorded from two normal subjects whose pupils were maximally dilated. A range of intensities of bleaching light were used, from 500 - 3000 photopic cd m-2, and exposures were made sufficiently long in duration to achieve a steady-state bleach. In addition, responses were also recorded following shorter durations of exposures to the highest intensity (3000 cd m- 2); these durations ranged from 5 - 60 s. The amplitude of the a-wave response to dim flashes was reduced following the exposures, with brighter or longer exposures causing greater reduction. The amplitude then recovered within about 4 min to the pre- bleach level. The amplitudes measured at ca 15 ms after the flash were used to derive the effective intensity of the flashes, thereby quantifying the fraction of photopigment available at the time of delivery of each flash. Recovery from all exposures in both subjects followed a common time-course, which could be described well by a model of pigment kinetics based on rate-limited regeneration, where the initial rate of recovery following a total bleach was ca 50% of the total pigment per minute, and the residual pigment level for half the maximal rate was ca 20% of the total pigment. The same parameters, together with a fixed photosensitivity, could account for the steady-state pigment levels seen at each bleaching intensity, and also for the fraction of pigment bleached following exposures of different duration at the highest intensity. The dim-flash ERG thus provides a novel method for assessing pigment regeneration in vivo. Our finding that pigment regeneration follows rate-limited kinetics may explain previous reports of pigment regeneration deviating from first order kinetics. We present a model of regeneration in which the rate limit arises from a limitation in the delivery of 11- cis retinoid to the photoreceptor outer segments.


Key words: Electroretinogram • Photoreceptor • Visual pigment







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.