J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on October 10, 2003.
Copyright © 2003 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
553/1/183    most recent
jphysiol.2003.051896v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crane, G. J
Right arrow Articles by Garland, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crane, G. J
Right arrow Articles by Garland, C. J.

Received September 29, 2003
Revised October 2, 2003
Accepted after revision October 6, 2003

Small and intermediate calcium-dependent K+ channels provide different facets of endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization in rat mesenteric artery

Glenis J Crane1, Nikki T Gallagher1, Kim A. Dora1, and Christopher J. Garland1*

1 University of Bath

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.j.garland{at}bath.ac.uk.

Activation of both small-conductance (SKCa) and intermediate-conductance (IKCa) Ca2+-activated K- channels in endothelial cells leads to vascular smooth muscle hyperpolarization and relaxation in rat mesenteric arteries. The contribution that each endothelial K-channel type makes to the smooth muscle hyperpolarization is unknown. In the presence of an NO synthase inhibitor, ACh evoked endothelium and concentration-dependent smooth muscle hyperpolarization, increasing the resting potential (~ -53 mV) by around 20 mV at 3 µM. Similar hyperpolarization was evoked with cyclopiazonic acid (SERCA inhibitor, 10 µM CPA), while 1- EBIO (300 µM, IKCa activator) only increased the potential by a few mV. Hyperpolarization to either ACh or CPA was abolished with apamin (50 nM, SKCa blocker) but unaltered by 1-[(2-chlorophenyl) diphenylmethyl]-1H- pyrazole (1 µM TRAM-34, IKCa blocker). During depolarization and contraction to PE, ACh still increased the membrane potential to around -70 mV, but with apamin present the membrane potential only increased just beyond the original resting potential (circa -58 mV). TRAM-34 alone did not affect hyperpolarization to ACh, but in combination with apamin, ACh-evoked hyperpolarization was completely abolished. These data suggest that true endothelium- dependent hyperpolarization of smooth muscle cells in response to ACh is attributable to SKCa, channels, whereas IKCa channels play an important role during the ACh-mediated repolarization phase only observed following depolarization.


Key words: Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor • K+ channel • Vasodilatation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.