J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on September 26, 2003.
Copyright © 2003 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
553/3/729    most recent
jphysiol.2003.053439v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rouach, N.
Right arrow Articles by Avignone, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rouach, N.
Right arrow Articles by Avignone, E.

Received August 15, 2003
Revised September 5, 2003
Accepted after revision September 26, 2003

Carbenoxolone blockade of neuronal network activity in culture is not mediated by an action on gap junctions

Nathalie Rouach1, Menahem Segal2, Annette Koulakoff3, Christian Giaume3, and Elena Avignone4*

1 University of California San Francisco, USA
2 Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
3 College de France, Paris, France
4 Dundee University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.avignone{at}dundee.ac.uk.

Spontaneous activity in the central nervous system is strongly suppressed by blockers of gap junctions (GJ), suggesting that GJ contribute to network activity. However, the lack of selective GJ blockers prohibits the determination of their site of action, i.e. neuronal versus glial. Astrocytes are strongly coupled through GJ and have recently been shown to modulate synaptic transmission, yet their role in neuronal network activity was not analyzed. The present study investigated the effects and site of action of the GJ blocker, carbenoxolone (CBX), on neuronal network activity. To this end, we used cultures of hippocampal or cortical neurons, plated on astrocytes. In these cultures neurons display spontaneous synchronous activity and GJ are found only in astrocytes. CBX induced in these neurons a reversible suppression of spontaneous action potential discharges, synaptic currents and synchronised calcium oscillations. Moreover, CBX inhibited oscillatory activity induced by the GABAA antagonist, bicuculline. These effects were not due to blockade of astrocytic GJ, since they were not mimicked nor occluded by endothelin-1 (ET-1), a peptide known to block astrocytic GJ. Also, these effects were still present in co-cultures of wild type neurons plated on astrocytes originating from connexin- 43 (Cx43) knockout mice, and in neuronal cultures which contain few isolated astrocytes. CBX was not likely to exert its effect through neuronal GJ either, as immunostaining for major neuronal connexins (Cx) as well as dye or electrical coupling, were not detected in the different models of cultured neurons examined. Finally while CBX (at 100 µM) did not modify presynaptic transmitter release and postsynaptic responses to glutamate, it did cause an increase in the action potential threshold and strongly decreased the firing rate in response to a sustained depolarising current. These data demonstrate that CBX does not exert its action on network activity of cultured neurons through astrocytic GJ and suggest that it has direct effects on neurons, not involving GJ.


Key words: Astrocyte • Gap junction • Neuronal activity







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.