J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on November 14, 2003.
Copyright © 2003 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
554/3/707    most recent
jphysiol.2003.055871v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rancillac, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crepel, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rancillac, A.
Right arrow Articles by Crepel, F.

Received September 26, 2003
Revised October 21, 2003
Accepted after revision November 10, 2003

Synapses between parallel fibres and stellate cells express long-term changes in synaptic efficacy in rat cerebellum

Armelle Rancillac1 and Francis Crepel1*

1 Université Paris VI

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: francis.crepel{at}snv.jussieu.fr.

Various forms of synaptic plasticity underlying motor learning have already been well characterised at cerebellar parallel fibres (PFs)-Purkinje cells (PCs) synapses. As inhibitory interneurones play an important role in controlling the excitability and synchronisation of PCs, we tested the possibility that excitatory synapses between PFs and stellate cells (SCs) are also able to exhibit long-term changes in synaptic efficacy that might contribute to cerebellar network function. In the present study, we show that long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) were induced at these synapses by a low frequency stimulation protocol at 2 Hz for 60 s and that pairing this low frequency stimulation protocol with post-synaptic depolarisation induced a marked shift of synaptic plasticity in favour of LTP. This LTP was cAMP independent, but required nitric oxide (NO) production from pre- and/or post- synaptic elements, depending on the stimulation or pairing protocol used respectively. In contrast, LTD was not dependent on NO production but required activation of post-synaptic group II, and possibly also of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors. Finally, PFs stimulations at 8 Hz for 15 s also induced LTP at PF-SC synapses, but in this case, LTP was cAMP dependent, like pre-synaptic LTP induced in the same conditions at PF-PC synapses. Thus, long-term changes in synaptic efficacy can be accomplished by PF-SCs synapses, as well as by PF- PC synapses, so that both types of plasticity might co- operate during cerebellar motor learning.


Key words: Cerebellum • Interneurone • Synaptic plasticity







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2003 The Physiological Society.