|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received March 18, 2004
Revised April 14, 2004
Accepted after revision May 29, 2004
1 Dep't Neuroscience, Ophthalmology & Genetics, University of Genoa
2 Sobell Dep't Neurophysiol, Inst. Neurol., London
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.rothwell{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk.
Termination of a muscle contraction is as important a part of movement as muscle activation yet the mechanisms responsible are less well understood. In the present experiments we examined the possible role of intracortical inhibitory circuits in terminating a 20% maximum isometric contraction of the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) in 8 healthy subjects. Subjects performed the task simultaneously with both hands and received single or pairs (at an interstimulus interval of 3ms to evaluate short interval intracortical inhibition, SICI)) of transcranial magnetic stimuli (TMS) via a focal coil over the motor hand area of the left hemisphere at different times before and after the onset of relaxation. The amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) following a single or a pair of TMS pulses was measured in the right FDI and plotted relative to the onset of relaxation as estimated from the surface electromyogram (EMG) of the left FDI. MEPs were larger during contraction than after relaxation whereas SICI was absent during contraction and reappeared after relaxation. We found that in all subjects, the time course of MEP changes during relaxation was closely fitted by a Boltzmann sigmoidal curve which allowed us to estimate the mean MEP amplitudes as well as the ratio of the amplitudes after single or pairs of TMS pulses (i.e. %SICI) at any time in the task. The data showed that the amplitude of MEPs to single pulse TMS had started to decline at about the same time as the onset of EMG silence. Furthermore, the size of the MEPs evoked by paired pulses decreased up to 30ms beforehand. The latter suggests that an increase in SICI occurs prior to the onset of MEP changes, and hence that increased cortical inhibition may play a role in suppressing corticospinal excitability during relaxation. A subsidiary experiment showed that the time relations of changes in SICI and MEP were unchanged by a period of 10min training on the task.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Perez and L. G. Cohen Mechanisms Underlying Functional Changes in the Primary Motor Cortex Ipsilateral to an Active Hand J. Neurosci., May 28, 2008; 28(22): 5631 - 5640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. D. Byblow, J. P. Coxon, C. M. Stinear, M. K. Fleming, G. Williams, J. F. M. Muller, and U. Ziemann Functional Connectivity Between Secondary and Primary Motor Areas Underlying Hand-Foot Coordination J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 414 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. van Elswijk, B. U. Kleine, S. Overeem, and D. F. Stegeman Expectancy induces dynamic modulation of corticospinal excitability. J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2007; 19(1): 121 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Soto, J. Valls-Sole, P. Shanahan, and J. Rothwell Reduction of Intracortical Inhibition in Soleus Muscle During Postural Activity J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1711 - 1717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Coxon, C. M. Stinear, and W. D. Byblow Intracortical Inhibition During Volitional Inhibition of Prepared Action J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3371 - 3383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |