J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on July 22, 2004.
Copyright © 2004 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
560/1/191    most recent
jphysiol.2004.067678v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, Y.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by He, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, Y.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by He, J.

Received May 4, 2004
Revised June 9, 2004
Accepted after revision July 21, 2004

In-vivo intracellular responses of the medial geniculate neurones to acoustic stimuli

Yan-Qin Yu1, Ying Xiong1, Ying-Shing Chan2, and Jufang He1*

1 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
2 The University of Hong Kong

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rsjufang{at}polyu.edu.hk.

In the present study, we investigated the auditory response features of the medial geniculate neurones, using in-vivo intracellular recordings in anaesthetized guinea pigs. Of the 76 neurones examined, 9 showed OFF or ON-OFF responses to an acoustic stimulus and thus were defined as OFF or ON-OFF neurones. Among the remaining 67 neurones, 42 showed an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) to acoustic stimuli and 25 showed either a pure inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP, 7 neurones), or an IPSP preceded by an EPSP (EPSP-IPSP type, 18 neurones). The EPSP responses exhibited a mean latency of 15.7±6.1 ms, which was significantly shorter than that of the IPSP responses (21.3±8.6 ms, P < 0.01). The IPSP responses also showed a significantly greater duration than the EPSP (208.5±128.2 ms vs 122.4±84.8 ms, P < 0.05), while there were no significant differences between the amplitudes of IPSP and EPSP (8.3±3.2 mV vs 8.7±5.3 mV). Of the 11 neurones that showed EPSP responses to acoustic stimuli and were histologically labelled, 7 were located in the lemniscal MGB and 4 in the non-lemniscal MGB. Another 6 labelled neurones that showed IPSP responses to acoustic stimuli were located in the non-lemniscal MGB. With a membrane potential of above -72 mV, the neurones showed greater EPSP or IPSP to an acoustic stimulus when their membrane potential was depolarised. However, upon hyperpolarization to below -74 mV, the neurones shifted to low-threshold calcium spikes (LTS)/LTS-bursts. In response to auditory stimuli of different durations, OFF neurones that responded to the offset of the acoustic stimulus and were located in the non-lemniscal MGB showed different response latencies or deviations of latencies in addition to exhibiting different numbers of spikes, suggesting that the timing of the spikes could be another component utilized by thalamic neurones to encode information on the stimulus. Given that some non-lemniscal neurones are multisensory and project to the entire auditory cortex, the selective corticofugal inhibition in the non-lemniscal MGB would enable the ascending pathway to prepare the auditory cortex to receive subsequent auditory information, avoiding the interference of other sensory inputs.


Key words: Auditory system • Electrophysiology • Thalamus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. Ji and N. Suga
Tone-Specific and Nonspecific Plasticity of the Auditory Cortex Elicited by Pseudoconditioning: Role of Acetylcholine Receptors and the Somatosensory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1384 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Z. Zhang, C.-H. Liu, Y.-Q. Yu, K. Fujimoto, Y.-S. Chan, and J. He
Corticofugal Projection Inhibits the Auditory Thalamus Through the Thalamic Reticular Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2938 - 2945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Cotillon-Williams, C. Huetz, E. Hennevin, and J.-M. Edeline
Tonotopic Control of Auditory Thalamus Frequency Tuning by Reticular Thalamic Neurons
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1137 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. H. Smith, E. L. Bartlett, and A. Kowalkowski
Cortical and Collicular Inputs to Cells in the Rat Paralaminar Thalamic Nuclei Adjacent to the Medial Geniculate Body
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 681 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Y. Xiong, Y.-Q. Yu, Y.-S. Chan, and J. He
Effects of cortical stimulation on auditory-responsive thalamic neurones in anaesthetized guinea pigs
J. Physiol., October 1, 2004; 560(1): 207 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2004 The Physiological Society.