J Physiol Editor in Chief
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on July 22, 2004.
Copyright © 2004 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
560/1/207    most recent
jphysiol.2004.067686v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by He, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by He, J.

Received May 4, 2004
Revised June 9, 2004
Accepted after revision July 21, 2004

Effects of cortical stimulation on auditory-responsive thalamic neurones

Ying Xiong1, Yan-Qin Yu1, Ying-Shing Chan2, and Jufang He1*

1 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
2 The University of Hong Kong

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rsjufang{at}polyu.edu.hk.

In the present study, we investigated neuronal responses to acoustic stimuli and cortical stimulation in the medial geniculate body (MGB) through in-vivo intracellular recordings in anaesthetized guinea pigs. Of the 54 neurones examined with acoustic stimuli, 36 showed excitatory postsynaptic potential responses (EPSP) and 19 showed inhibitory postsynaptic potential responses (IPSP) to acoustic stimuli. Of the 36 EPSP neurones examined with corticofugal modulation, 29 received corticofugal depolarisation, 3 corticofugal inhibition, and 4 showed no effect. Of the 19 IPSP neurones, 17 received corticofugal inhibition and 2 were not affected. The mean amplitude of the EPSPs evoked by acoustic stimuli was similar to that evoked by the electrical cortical stimulation (9.19?.55 mV vs 9.22?.16 mV). There was a significant correlation between the parameters of the EPSPs of those evoked by an acoustic stimulus and those evoked by cortical stimulation. The mean amplitude of the IPSP evoked by electrical cortical stimulation was significantly greater than that evoked by acoustic stimuli (11.6?.8 mV vs 9.1?.7 ms, P<0.05). Seven auditory EPSP and seven IPSP neurones were examined with corticofugal modulation and labelled with neurobiotin. Of the 7 EPSP neurones, 5 showed excitatory responses to cortical stimulation and 2 demonstrated no effects. Four of the 5 neurones that received corticofugal depolarisation were located in the lemniscal MGB and 1 in the non-lemniscal MGB; of the remaining 2, 1 was located in the lemniscal and the other in the non-lemniscal MGB. Of the 7 IPSP neurones, 1 received an excitatory corticofugal input followed by an inhibitory input, and 4 received only an inhibitory corticofugal input; while the remainder demonstrated no corticofugal effects. All 7 neurones were located in the non-lemniscal MGB. The result of a similar shape of EPSP caused by both ascending and descending inputs reflects a neuronal endogenous characteristic irrespective of the physical locations of the synapses. The IPSP responses to both acoustic stimuli and electrical cortical stimulation are likely caused by feedback from the thalamic reticular nucleus.


Key words: Auditory system • Electrical stimulation • Thalamus







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2004 The Physiological Society.