J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on October 13, 2005.
Copyright © 2005 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
569/3/975    most recent
jphysiol.2005.089649v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haouzi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Chenuel, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haouzi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Chenuel, B.

Received April 30, 2005
Revised June 7, 2005
Accepted after revision October 11, 2005

CONTROL OF ARTERIAL PCO2 BY SOMATIC AFFERENTS IN SHEEP

Philippe Haouzi1* and Bruno Chenuel1

1 Faculte de Medecine de Nancy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: p.haouzi{at}chu-nancy.fr.

The ventilatory ( E) response to electrically induced rhythmic muscle contractions (ERC) was studied in six urethane-chloralose anaesthetised sheep, while PaO2, PaCO2 and perfusion pressure were maintained constant at the known chemoreception sites. With cephalic PaCO2 held constant, the response to inhaled CO2 was virtually abolished (0.03 ± 0.04 l min-1 Torr-1). During low current ERC, which doubled the metabolic rate ( CO2 increased from 192 ± 23 to 317 ± 84 ml min-1, p<0.01), E followed the change in CO2 closely (from 5.24 ± 1.81 to 9.27± 3.60 l min-1, p<0.01) in the absence of any chemical error signal occurring at carotid and central chemoreceptor level (? Cephalic PaCO2 = -0.75 ± 1 Torr). Systemic PaCO2 decreased by -2.47 + 1.9 Torr (p<0.01). Both HR and systemic BP increased significantly by 18.6 ± 5.5 b min-1 and 7.0 ± 9.3 mmHg respectively. When the CO2 flow to the central circulation was reduced during ERC by blocking venous return ( CO2 decreased by 102 ± 45 l min-1, p<0.01), ventilation was stimulated (from 11.99± 4.11 to 13.01 ± 4.63 l min-1, p<0.05). The opposite effect was observed by blocking the arterial supply. Finally, raising the CO2 content and flow in the systemic blood was unable to stimulate significantly ventilation provided the peripheral and central chemoreceptors were unaware of the changes in blood CO2/H+ composition. Our results support the existence of a system capable of controlling blood PaCO2 homeostasis when the metabolism increases independent of peripheral and central respiratory chemoreceptors. Information from the skeletal muscles related to the local vascular response provides the central nervous system with a respiratory stimulus proportional to the rate at which gas are exchanged in the muscles, thereby coupling ventilation to the metabolic rate.


Key words: Chemosensitivity • Muscle contraction • Respiratory control




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
F. L. Eldridge, D. Morin, J. R. Romaniuk, S. Yamashiro, J. T. Potts, R. M. Ichiyama, H. Bell, E. A. Phillipson, K. J. Killian, N. L. Jones, et al.
Comment on Point:Counterpoint "Supraspinal locomotor centers do/do not contribute significantly to the hyperpnea of dynamic exercise in humans"
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2006; 100(5): 1743 - 1747.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Y. Yu and C.-S. Poon
Critique of 'Control of arterial PCO2 by somatic afferents'
J. Physiol., May 1, 2006; 572(3): 897 - 898.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. Haouzi and B. Chenuel
Reply from P. Haouzi and B. Chenuel
J. Physiol., May 1, 2006; 572(3): 899 - 900.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. E. Nattie
Do muscle blood flow detectors link breathing to oxygen consumption in exercise?
J. Physiol., December 15, 2005; 569(3): 714 - 714.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 The Physiological Society.