J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on September 7, 2006.
Copyright © 2006 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
577/1/249    most recent
jphysiol.2006.117358v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Frank W. Pfrieger
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinmetz, C. C
Right arrow Articles by Pfrieger, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steinmetz, C. C
Right arrow Articles by Pfrieger, F. W.

Received July 18, 2006
Revised August 29, 2006
Accepted after revision September 4, 2006

Regional variations in the glial influence on synapse development in the mouse CNS

Celine C Steinmetz1, Isabelle Buard1, Thomas Claudepierre1, Karl Nagler1, and Frank W. Pfrieger1*

1 Inst Cell Integ Neurosci (INCI), Strasbourg

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fw-pfrieger{at}gmx.de.

There is increasing evidence that synapse function depends on interactions with glial cells, namely astrocytes. Studies on specific neurons of the central nervous system (CNS) indicated that glial signals also control synapse development, but it remained unclear, whether this is a general principle that applies to other neuronal cell types. To address this question, we developed new methods to immunoisolate neurons from different brain regions of postnatal mice and to culture them in a chemically defined medium. Electrophysiological recordings and immunocytochemical staining revealed vigorous synaptogenesis in hippocampal and cerebellar neurons, but not in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the absence of glial cells. Coculture with glia promoted synapse formation in RGCs as indicated by a strong increase in the incidence and frequency of action potential-independent miniature synaptic currents, but showed no such effects in hippocampal or cerebellar neurons. On the other hand, glial signals promoted the efficacy of excitatory synapses in all regions as indicated by an increase in the size of spontaneous synaptic events in cerebellar cultures and of miniature synaptic currents in hippocampal neurons and RGCs. Inhibitory synaptic currents remained largely unaffected by glia. Our results indicate that in the mammalian CNS, the way how glial signals promote the development of excitatory synapses depends on the type of neuron.


Key words: Glial cells • Synapse formation • Synaptic transmission




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. A. Johnson, J. P. Weick, R. A. Pearce, and S.-C. Zhang
Functional Neural Development from Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Accelerated Synaptic Activity via Astrocyte Coculture
J. Neurosci., March 21, 2007; 27(12): 3069 - 3077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 The Physiological Society.