J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on December 14, 2006.
Copyright © 2006 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
579/2/403    most recent
jphysiol.2006.124057v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chomiak, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hu, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chomiak, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hu, B.

Received October 31, 2006
Revised November 27, 2006
Accepted after revision December 7, 2006

Axonal and Somatic Filtering of Antidromically Evoked Cortical Excitation by Simulated Deep Brain Stimulation

Taylor Chomiak1 and Bin Hu1*

1 Division of Experimental Neuroences, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, HBI and Univ. of Calgary

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hub{at}ucalgary.ca.

Antidromic cortical excitation has been implicated as a contributing mechanism for high frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS). Here, we examined the reliability of antidromic responses of type 2 corticofugal fibers in rat over a stimulation frequency range compatible to the DBS used in humans. We antidromically activated single layer V cortical neurones by stimulating its two axonal branches. We found that antidromic cortical excitation is not as reliable as generally assumed. Whereas the fast conducting branches of a type 2 axon in the highly myelinated brainstem region follow high frequency stimulation, the slower conducting fibers in the poorly myelinated thalamic region, function as a low pass filters. These fibers fail to produce consecutive antidromic spikes at the beginning of high frequency stimulation, but are able to maintain a steady low-frequency (6-12 Hz) spike output during the stimulation. In addition, antidromic responses evoked from both branches are rarely present in cortical neurones with a more hyperpolarized membrane potential. Our data indicates that axon-mediated antidromic excitation in the cortex is strongly influenced by the myelo-architecture of the stimulation site and the excitability of individual cortical neurones.


Key words: Axon • Cortex • Electrical stimulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Chomiak, S. Peters, and B. Hu
Functional Architecture and Spike Timing Properties of Corticofugal Projections From Rat Ventral Temporal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 327 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Li, G. W. Arbuthnott, M. J. Jutras, J. A. Goldberg, and D. Jaeger
Resonant Antidromic Cortical Circuit Activation as a Consequence of High-Frequency Subthalamic Deep-Brain Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3525 - 3537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 The Physiological Society.