J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on January 11, 2007.
Copyright © 2007 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
580/3/777    most recent
jphysiol.2006.126276v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Philip J. Harrison
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, P. J.

Received December 12, 2006
Revised December 18, 2006
Accepted after revision January 9, 2007

Differential control of the scapulothoracic muscles in humans

Caroline M. Alexander1*, Rebecca Miley2, Siobhan Stynes3, and Philip J. Harrison2

1 1. Hammersmith Hospital NHS Trust 2. University College London
2 University College London
3 Brunel University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.alexander{at}ucl.ac.uk.

The control of the scapulothoracic muscles trapezius (Tr) and serratus anterior (SA), has been examined in normal human subjects. Electromyographic recordings were made from the SA and Tr muscles (upper trapezius UTr, lower trapezius LTr) using surface electrodes placed bilaterally. Magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex and electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves were used to examine their descending and reflex control. The average optimal site of cortical stimulation was found to be the same for SA, UTr and LTr (an approximate centre of gravity of -0.6cm, 3.7cm where the centre of gravity is expressed as the mean anterio-posterior position, the mean medio-lateral position). Some asymmetry in the cortical representation of UTr was found in each individual tested. Magnetic stimulation evoked bilateral MEPs in Tr (latency contralateral (c) UTr 8.5ms ± 1.6ms, ipsilateral (i) UTr 19.0ms ± 2.7ms) but only contralateral responses were evoked in SA (11.2ms ± 2.6ms). Electrical stimulation of the long thoracic nerve at two sites was used to examine homonymous and heteronymous reflexes of SA, while electrical stimulation of cervical nerve of C3/4 was used to examine the heteronymous reflexes of Tr. Ipsilateral SA H reflexes were evoked at a latency of 9.9ms ± 0.8ms (proximal site) and 10.8ms ± 1.2ms (distal site). No group I reflexes were evoked from SA to its contralateral homologue. No group I reflexes were evoked between Tr and SA. Finally, cross correlation of activity from the Tr muscle pairs and the SA muscle pair revealed that the motoneurones of the Tr muscles share some common presynaptic input whereas there was no detectable common presynaptic input to the SA muscle pair. This study extends and consolidates knowledge regarding the neural control of trapezius and for the first time explores the neural control of SA. The study demonstrates a contrasting bilateral control of Tr and SA. These patterns of connections are discussed in relation to the contrasting bilateral functional roles of these muscles.


Key words: Reflex • Sensorimotor control • Transcranial magnetic stimulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
W. B. Kibler, A. D. Sciascia, T. L. Uhl, N. Tambay, and T. Cunningham
Electromyographic Analysis of Specific Exercises for Scapular Control in Early Phases of Shoulder Rehabilitation
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1789 - 1798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.