J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on July 26, 2007.
Copyright © 2007 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
583/3/1069    most recent
jphysiol.2007.130526v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Battram, D. S
Right arrow Articles by Dela, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Battram, D. S
Right arrow Articles by Dela, F.

Received February 15, 2007
Revised April 10, 2007
Accepted after revision July 20, 2007

Caffeine's impairment of insulin-mediated glucose disposal cannot be solely attributed to adrenaline

Danielle S Battram1*, Terry E Graham1, and Flemming Dela2

1 University of Guelph
2 University of Copenhagen

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dbattram{at}uoguelph.ca.

Caffeine (CAF) impedes insulin-mediated glucose disposal (IMGD) and increases plasma adrenaline concentrations ([ADR]; 0.6 {eta}M). While the antagonism of ADR abolishes the CAF effect, infusion of ADR (0.75 {eta}M) has no effect on IMGD. We have now examined CAF and ADR in concert to determine whether or not they elicit an additive response on IMGD. We hypothesized that CAF + ADR will elicit a greater effect than either CAF or ADR alone (i.e. that CAF effects would not be solely attributed to ADR). Subjects (n = 8) completed 4 trials in a randomized manner. An isoglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp was performed 30 min after the following treatments were administered: 1) placebo capsules and saline infusion ([ADR] = 0.29 {eta}M) (PL trial), 2) CAF capsules (dose = 5 mg kg-1) and saline infusion ([ADR] = 0.62 {eta}M) (CAF trial), 3) PL capsules and ADR infusion ([ADR] = 1.19 {eta}M) (ADR trial), and 4) CAF capsules (dose = 5 mg kg-1) and ADR infusion ([ADR] = 0.93 {eta}M) (CAF + ADR trial). As expected, CAF, ADR and CAF + ADR decreased (P ≤ 0.05) IMGD compared to PL. CAF + ADR resulted in a more pronounced decrease in IMGD vs PL (42%) compared to CAF (26%) or ADR (24%) alone, however the effect was not fully additive (P = 0.08). Furthermore, CAF decreased IMGD to a similar magnitude as ADR despite a 50% lower [ADR]. In summary, while ADR contributes to the CAF-induced impairment in IMGD, it is not solely responsible for caffeine's effects.


Key words: Adenosine receptor • Glucose transport • Skeletal muscle • insulin resistance







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.