J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on July 19, 2007.
Copyright © 2007 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
583/3/1041    most recent
jphysiol.2007.139204v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Studinger, P.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Studinger, P.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. A.

Received June 21, 2007
Revised July 11, 2007
Accepted after revision July 13, 2007

Mechanical and Neural Contributions to Hysteresis in the Cardiac Vagal Limb of the Arterial Baroreflex

Peter Studinger1, Richard Goldstein1, and J. Andrew Taylor1*

1 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jandrew_taylor{at}hms.harvard.edu.

According to conventional wisdom, hysteresis in cardiac vagal baroreflex function exhibits a specific pattern: pressure falls are associated with longer heart periods and a smaller linear gain. A similar pattern occurs in the pressure-diameter relationship of barosensory vessels, therefore it has been suggested that baroreflex hysteresis derives solely from vascular behaviour. However, we hypothesized that mechanical and neural baroreflex components contribute equally to baroreflex hysteresis. Blood pressure, carotid diameter, and the electrocardiogram were recorded continuously during two trials of sequential bolus injections of nitroprusside and phenylephrine in fourteen young healthy subjects. Baroreflex gain and its mechanical and neural components were estimated for falls and rises in pressure and diameter. The position or set point of the relations was quantified at the mean pressure and mean diameter. Gains were determined via piecewise linear regression. Set points and gains for falls versus rises in pressure and diameter were compared with the Chow test. Hysteresis was observed in all individuals, but not in every trial. In most, but not all trials pressure falls were associated with longer heart periods and smaller linear gain, as conventional wisdom would predict. However, the pattern of hysteresis derived from the interaction of both mechanical and neural components. The two components most often acted in opposition to determine differences in set point, but in conjunction to determine differences in baroreflex gain. Therefore, we conclude that hysteresis is not solely determined by barosensory vessel behaviour but by the complex interaction of mechanical and neural aspects of the arterial baroreflex.


Key words: Baroreceptor reflex • Hysteresis • Resetting




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. N. Young, J. P. Fisher, and P. J. Fadel
The ups and downs of assessing baroreflex function
J. Physiol., March 1, 2008; 586(5): 1209 - 1211.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.