J Physiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on November 8, 2007.
Copyright © 2007 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
586/1/151    most recent
jphysiol.2007.142109v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgomaster, K. A
Right arrow Articles by Gibala, M. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burgomaster, K. A
Right arrow Articles by Gibala, M. J
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Received August 1, 2007
Revised September 6, 2007
Accepted after revision October 23, 2007

Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans

Kirsten A Burgomaster1, Krista R Howarth1, Stuart M Phillips1, Mark Rakobowchuk1, Maureen J MacDonald1, Sean L McGee2, and Martin J Gibala1*

1 McMaster University
2 University of Melbourne

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gibalam{at}mcmaster.ca.

Low-volume "sprint" interval training (SIT) stimulates rapid improvements in muscle oxidative capacity that are comparable to traditional endurance training (ET) but no study has examined metabolic adaptations during exercise after these diverse training strategies. We hypothesized that SIT and ET would induce similar adaptations in markers of skeletal muscle carbohydrate (CHO) and lipid metabolism and metabolic control during exercise despite large differences in training volume and time commitment. Active but untrained subjects (23±1 y) performed a constant-load cycling challenge (1 h at 65% of VO2peak) before and after 6 wk of either SIT or ET (n=5 men and 5 women per group). SIT consisted of 4-6 repeats of a 30 s "all out" Wingate Test with 4.5 min recovery per d, 3 dwk-1. ET consisted of 40-60 min of continuous cycling at ~65% VO2peak per d, 5 dwk-1. Weekly time commitment (~1.5 vs ~4.5 h) and total training volume (~600 vs ~3000 kJwk-1) was substantially lower in SIT vs ET. Despite these differences, both protocols induced similar increases (P<0.05) in mitochondrial markers for skeletal muscle CHO (pyruvate dehydrogenase E1{alpha} protein content) and lipid oxidation (3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase maximal activity) and protein content of peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1alpha. Glycogen and phosphocreatine utilization during exercise were reduced after training, and calculated rates of whole-body CHO and lipid oxidation were decreased and increased respectively, with no differences between groups (all main effects, P<0.05). Given the markedly lower training volume in the SIT group, these data suggest that high-intensity interval training is a time-efficient strategy to increase skeletal muscle oxidative capacity and induce specific metabolic adaptations during exercise that are comparable to traditional ET.


Key words: Metabolic regulation • Oxidative metabolism • Skeletal muscle


Related Article

Specificity of training adaptation: time for a rethink?
John A. Hawley
J. Physiol. 2008 586: 1-2. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. A. Hawley
Specificity of training adaptation: time for a rethink?
J. Physiol., January 1, 2008; 586(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.