J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on October 18, 2007.
Copyright © 2007 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
586/5/1225    most recent
jphysiol.2007.145078v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, C.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, C.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. D.

Received September 15, 2007
Revised October 2, 2007
Accepted after revision October 12, 2007

Active properties of motoneurone dendrites: diffuse descending modulation, focused local inhibition

C. Heckman1*, Allison S. Hyngstrom2, and Michael D. Johnson2

1 Northwestern University Medical School
2 Northwestern University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c-heckman{at}northwestern.edu.

The dendrites of spinal motoneurones are highly active, generating a strong persistent inward current (PIC) that has an enormous impact on synaptic integration. The PIC is subject to regulation by descending neuromodulatory systems releasing the monoamines serotonin and norepinephrine. At high monoaminergic drive levels, the PIC dominates synaptic integration, generating an intrinsic dendritic current that is as much as 5-fold larger than the current entering via synapses. In contrast, motoneurones lacking significant PICs are virtually non-excitable. Presumably, this descending control of the synaptic integration via the PIC is used to adjust the excitability (gain) of motoneurones for different motor tasks. A problem with this gain control is that monoaminergic input to the cord is very diffuse, affecting many motor pools simultaneously, likely including both agonists and antagonists. The PIC is, however, exquisitely sensitive to the reciprocal inhibition mediated by length sensitive muscle spindle Ia afferents and Ia interneurons. Reciprocal inhibition is tightly focused, shared only between strict mechanical antagonists, and thus can act to "sculpt" specific movement patterns out of a background of diffuse neuromodulation. Thus it is likely that motoneurone gain is set by the interaction between diffuse descending neuromodulation and specific and local synaptic inhibitory circuits.


Key words: 5-Hydroxytryptamine • Noradrenaline (norepinephrine) • Spinal motoneurone




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
K. Ng, J. Howells, J. D. Pollard, and D. Burke
Up-regulation of slow K+ channels in peripheral motor axons: a transcriptional channelopathy in multiple sclerosis
Brain, August 12, 2008; (2008) awn180v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. Hyngstrom, M. Johnson, J. Schuster, and C. J. Heckman
Movement-related receptive fields of spinal motoneurones with active dendrites
J. Physiol., March 15, 2008; 586(6): 1581 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. C. Fitzpatrick
The cortex, interneurones and motoneurones in the control of movement
J. Physiol., March 1, 2008; 586(5): 1215 - 1216.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 The Physiological Society.