J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on January 31, 2008.
Copyright © 2008 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
586/6/1581    most recent
jphysiol.2007.149146v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hyngstrom, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hyngstrom, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Received December 3, 2007
Revised January 9, 2008
Accepted after revision January 21, 2008

Movement related receptive fields of spinal motoneurones with active dendrites

Allison S. Hyngstrom1, Michael D. Johnson1, Jenna E. Schuster1, and C. J. Heckman1*

1 Northwestern University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c-heckman{at}northwestern.edu.

The primary control of spinal motoneurone excitability is mediated by descending monoaminergic systems, which have diffuse effects on multiple motor pools. Much of the sensory input evoked by movement is also distributed broadly to multiple joints. The muscle spindle Ia afferent system, however, is sharply focused, with Ia excitation restricted to close synergists and Ia reciprocal inhibition only shared between antagonists acting at a single joint. We studied the interaction of neuromodulatory and sensory inputs in determining the movement related receptive field (MRRF) of motoneurones during passive joint movements of the cat hindlimb. In a decerebrate preparation with tonic monoaminergic input to the cord, the MRRFs tended to be focused for the ankle and knee extensor motor pools studied. Ankle rotation produced larger synaptic currents in ankle extensors than knee or hip rotations and knee rotation dominated input to the knee extensors. The persistent inward current (PIC) in motoneurone dendrites, which is facilitated by monoaminergic input, amplified the MRRF about 2-fold, consistent with its effects on other inputs. Acute spinal transaction markedly broadened MRRFs, with hip rotation generating large currents in both ankle and knee extensors. Spinalization also eliminated amplification of MRRFs, as expected from elimination of descending monoaminergic input. Ia reciprocal inhibition is very effective in suppressing dendritic PICs and thus provides a local and specific PIC control system to oppose the diffuse PIC facilitation from descending monoaminergic systems. The focused MRRF seen in the intact cord state would allow reciprocal inhibition to fulfill this role without undue interference from multi-joint input from other afferent systems.


Key words: Motor control • Neuromodulation • Sensorimotor control


Related Article

The control of motoneurone activity: getting all of the players on the same stage
P. Ken Rose
J. Physiol. 2008 586: 1463. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Worrell and R. B. Levine
Characterization of Voltage-Dependent Ca2+ Currents in Identified Drosophila Motoneurons In Situ
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 868 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. K. Rose
The control of motoneurone activity: getting all of the players on the same stage
J. Physiol., March 15, 2008; 586(6): 1463 - 1463.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 The Physiological Society.