J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Physiology in Press

First published online on February 21, 2008.
Copyright © 2008 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
586/8/2183    most recent
jphysiol.2008.150698v1
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riley, Z. A.
Right arrow Articles by Enoka, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riley, Z. A.
Right arrow Articles by Enoka, R. M.

Received January 7, 2008
Revised January 30, 2008
Accepted after revision February 19, 2008

Motor Unit Recruitment in Human Biceps Brachii During Sustained Voluntary Contractions

Zachary A. Riley1*, Adam H. Maerz1, Jane C. Litsey1, and Roger M. Enoka1

1 University of Colorado at Boulder

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zachary.riley{at}colorado.edu.

The purpose of the study was to examine the influence of the difference between the recruitment threshold of a motor unit and the target force of the sustained contraction on the discharge of the motor unit at recruitment. The discharge characteristics of 53 motor units in biceps brachii were recorded after being recruited during a sustained contraction. Some motor units (n = 22) discharged action potentials tonically after being recruited, whereas others (n = 31) discharged intermittent trains of action potentials. The two groups of motor units were distinguished by the difference between the recruitment threshold of the motor unit and the target force for the sustained contraction: tonic = 5.9 ± 2.5%; intermittent = 10.7 ± 2.9%. Discharge rate for the tonic units decreased progressively (13.9 ± 2.7 pps to 11.7 ± 2.6 pps; P = 0.04) during the 99 ± 111 s contraction. Train rate, train duration, and average discharge rate for the intermittent motor units did not change across 211 ± 153 s of intermittent discharge. The initial discharge rate at recruitment during the sustained contraction was lower for the intermittent motor units (11.0 ± 3.3 pps) than the tonic motor units (13.7 ± 3.3 pps; P = 0.005), and the coefficient of variation for interspike interval was higher for the intermittent motor units (34.6 ± 12.3%) than the tonic motor units (21.2 ± 9.4%) at recruitment (P = 0.001) and remained elevated for discharge duration (34.6 ± 9.2% vs. 19.1 ± 11.7%, P < 0.001). In an additional experiment, 12 motor units were recorded at two different target forces below recruitment threshold (5.7 ± 1.9% and 10.5 ± 2.4%). Each motor unit exhibited the two discharge patterns (tonic and intermittent) as observed for the 53 motor units. The results suggest that newly recruited motor units with recruitment thresholds closer to the target force experienced less synaptic noise at the time of recruitment that resulted in them discharging action potentials at more regular and greater rates than motor units with recruitment thresholds further from the target force.


Key words: Membrane potential • Motor unit • Synaptic current







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 The Physiological Society.