Placental angiogenesis in sheep models of compromised pregnancy
- Lawrence P. Reynolds1,
- Pawel P. Borowicz1,
- Kimberly A. Vonnahme1,
- Mary Lynn Johnson1,
- Anna T. Grazul-Bilska1,
- Dale A. Redmer1 and
- Joel S. Caton1
- 1Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, and Department of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA
- Corresponding author L. P. Reynolds: Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, and Department of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5727, USA. Email: larry.reynolds{at}ndsu.edu
Abstract
Because the placenta is the organ that transports nutrients, respiratory gases and wastes between the maternal and fetal systems, development of its vascular beds is essential to normal placental function, and thus in supporting normal fetal growth. Compromised fetal growth and development have adverse health consequences during the neonatal period and throughout adult life. To establish the role of placental angiogenesis in compromised pregnancies, we first evaluated the pattern of placental angiogenesis and expression of angiogenic factors throughout normal pregnancy. In addition, we and others have established a variety of sheep models to evaluate the effects on fetal growth of various factors including maternal nutrient excess or deprivation and specific nutrients, maternal age, maternal and fetal genotype, increased numbers of fetuses, environmental thermal stress, and high altitude (hypobaric) conditions. Although placental angiogenesis is altered in each of these models in which fetal growth is adversely affected, the specific effect on placental angiogenesis depends on the type of ‘stress’ to which the pregnancy is subjected, and also differs between the fetal and maternal systems and between genotypes. We believe that the models of compromised pregnancy and the methods described in this review will enable us to develop a much better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for alterations in placental vascular development.
Footnotes
-
- Accepted March 10, 2005.
- Received December 30, 2004.
- Revision received March 4, 2005.
- The Physiological society 2005













